Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Shit fer brains; not having an online bank account is more secure. Try to pay attention in the future.
What bank does not have their accounts computerized?
Shit fer brains; not having an online bank account is more secure. Try to pay attention in the future.
Listen I'm way moe supply side, but I know the other side has cases where it can work. WWII, Tennessee dam type projects
Wasn't he Clinton's chief economic advisor
Thank you Capt. Obvious! Look douchebag, you proved how clueless you are on this topic when you thanked Truth Deleter's dishonest drivel so do society a favor and shut the fuck up.
Clearly.
Apparently you are unaware of all the security problems popping up all of a sudden?
I remember laughing my ass off when the very bank manager who tried to convince me the internet was safe for banking was hit and almost lost her house.
Therefore, the answer to your obtuse query is only non-retards still use checkbooks, Simplefreak.
I can't find the post where SF asks this question, but i can't really believe he said that.
Yes I pay my bills online, but of course I have a checkbook for people who don't take debit cards, like my hairdresser. And of course I need a check book for my business. I write checks every week out of my business account. He's so weird.
So then queen of petty insults, you understand then that the Federal government should not be involved in providing a wage standard to afford a living?
Just because you have a civility problem with another poster does not equate their or my intelligence. It simply illustrates your ridiculous need to insult.
Ok... you show me where I stated it harmed the economy and I will show you when.
If you pay more for labor, the cost of goods will also tend to increase. You are not helping them, you are hurting them. The higher the unskilled wage goes, the more economically viable it is to replace them all together with technology.
So then queen of petty insults, you understand then that the Federal government should not be involved in providing a wage standard to afford a living?
Just because you have a civility problem with another poster does not equate their or my intelligence. It simply illustrates your ridiculous need to insult.
You clearly don't understand the difference between accounting and economics. That said, his saying 'U are no accountant' when I am in fact not an accountant, is not exactly earth shattering news.
You are aware of course that security problems with checks have existed for decades? Security will always be an issue. As long as people have money, other people will try to find ways to take it from them. That doesn't alter the fact that it is ridiculous to still have a checkbook.
LMAO... you think your bank account/identity is any more secure because you use checks? It isn't. Every check you use just allows people to gain access to your routing number and account number. Whereas if I use a debit card, the only way that information can be obtained is if the store has a security problem with their system. Even then there are safety measures built in to using debit and credit cards. Pretending your online bank accounts are more secure because you are retarded and use checks is hilarious.
What bank does not have their accounts computerized?
No, Truth Detector really is a stupid hyper-partisan hack, and so are you, and no, I do not agree with anything you think, say or do, because you are a dipshit of the first order.
This was proven the first day you were here when you tried to "gotcha" me and it backfired so severely (because you are stupid) that you had to change your name. So, as I said before, do everyone a favor and STFU.
Must be another verbally challenged Seattleite; now who might that be? Do you be any chance use ellipsis?
Unlike you, I don't need to brush anyone here with a single brush stroke. I can say after reading your responses to me, that your rationale as to who is "stupid" is clearly evidenced in your own "hyper partisanship".
I'm not interested in taking direction from you or anyone out here in the blogosphere. Your inability to reason without insult is childish.
I don't recall you proving anything. But if that idea helps you feel better, then OK.
I changed my moniker a day or two after the Hawks won. Get a grip dude.
Seattle is an awesome city.
Aren't you the poster who refuses.to use paragraphs, misapplies context to what others write, and punishes us with long winded posts full of meaningless invective and self promotion?
Bingo.Seattle is an awesome city.
Aren't you the poster who refuses.to use paragraphs, misapplies context to what others write, and punishes us with long winded posts full of meaningless invective and self promotion?
No one has been able to answer why a burger flipper deserves the same wage as one of my lab techs.
Thats the point, your lab techs are underpaid, when the minimum wages goes, so will their pay or they'll go flip burgers and have less responsibility for the same pay
You have some serious personality malfunctions. I'll leave you to them since it's obvious this is your MO.
Nonetheless is one word. I don't like to correct spelling or grammar, but you were just calling another poster stupid.
"None the less" is three separate words, no matter how common the combination is.
In British English, as recorded by the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, nonetheless is the normative form and none the less is the less common alternative.
Clue #1, moron, identify the players before choosing a side.
Grammar nazis are such fucking morons. Tom being a prime example of course, never mind this conservatard prick. (never mind doesn't need to be written as one word either, douchebag
Being less common isn't wrong.
Perfect example of why one should never correct another's grammar and spelling. Thank you. (interesting you would choose an obsolete spelling while chastising another's archaic word usage, and misspell two other words as well as make a punctuation error all in your post about me calling someone else stupid)
FYI, by nature "Right" is stupid compared to me because, like you, he remains conservative, never having intellectually mastered the instincts he was born with.
Get the picture douche nozzle?
1. to is redundant in the sentence above as well as the phrase "over it".
2. My use was neither archaic nor purposeful...The Concise Oxford English Dictionary is hardly archaic.
3. Pissing match is on bitch, you started it, and there is no ending it, nor in your case, any winning it.
I suggest you keep your pointy head observations about what you consider other's incorrect behavior to yourself in the future.