THAT explains a lot, inbred.
RNC Shocked!
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.11
- Start date
THAT explains a lot, inbred.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Seems to me you're lacking the "proof" that the peanut throwers were actual Republicans. Hey... if 'denial' is now the new defense, it works both ways... so let's see your 'proof' on this! As I said, I condemn it, I don't care who they were or why they did it, and I am not here making excuses for them. But that's what we see from liberals, excuses after excuse for why MSNBC discriminated against minorities and liberal hoodlums vandalized a black Republican's wikipedia page.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
that explains a lot. you assume like every other fucktard liberal. I said she LIVES in kentucky, not that she was born there. but facts will never stop you from being a retard, will it.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
That's pretty funny coming from you; seeing as how you had a money slot installed in your forehead, so when someone inserts a nickle, your teeth fold back.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Another steaming load you're shoveling. Go peddle your outrage to Faux, they did the same thing.
MSNBC Falsely Accused Of Purposely Omitting Minority Republican Speeches
by Andrew Kirell | 10:21 am, August 29th, 2012
Depending on what websites you read last night, you might think MSNBC purposely avoided airing the speeches of several ethnic minority Republicans to further their progressive personalities’ narrative of the GOP being “racist”.
RedAlert, Hot Air, The Daily Caller, and Town Hall were among the right-leaning websites who ran with the story that MSNBC had purposely neglected to cover the minority speeches.
We here at Mediaite also received many tips suggesting we check out these websites’ reports on the egregious racial move by MSNBC. One reader wrote that “MSNBC has proven they are the racsits [sic], and yet Mediaite refuses to present this fact?” and implored us to read about it “all over the internet; you look silly ignoring it.”
So we took a look at the Internet, and here’s what we found:
“MSNBC wants you to think the Republican Party hates minorities,” wrote RedAlert’s Francesca Chambers. She cited as evidence MSNBC’s lack of coverage of the speeches by black congressional candidate Mia Love, Hispanic Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, Cuban-American Senate nominee Ted Cruz, black former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis, and Puerto Rico’s First Lady Lucé Vela Fortuño.
“To fuel their false ‘GOP is racist’ argument, MSNBC conveniently cut every speech given by a minority,” wrote Town Hall editor Katie Pavlich in a reaction article titled “Pathetic”.
Indeed, a purposeful omission of the minority speakers would be “pathetic,” except for one glaring detail that all of these publications themselves omitted:
With the exception of black former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis, MSNBC and Fox News covered and omitted the same exact speeches.
Both networks aired the speeches by NH Senator Kelly Ayotte, Ohio Governor John Kasich, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, Ann Romney, and NJ Gov. Chris Christie.
But for minority speakers, here’s a handy guide to how the rival networks broke down coverage:
Mia Love: MNSBC was in commercial; Fox aired Shepard Smith‘s coverage of Hurricane Isaac from New Orleans.
Brian Sandoval: MSNBC aired hurricane coverage; Fox’s Sean Hannity interviewed Rep. Eric Cantor.
Ted Cruz: MSNBC cut to panel analysis of the convention; Fox went to commercial and returned with a Scott Walker interview.
Artur Davis: MSNBC aired panel discussion, mentioned his speech 5 minutes in, but didn’t air it; Fox aired the entirety of the speech.
Nikki Haley: both MSNBC and Fox News aired the speech.
Lucé Vela Fortuño: MSNBC aired more roundtable discussion; Fox News cut away to discussion by Bret Baier and Megyn Kelly.
So with the exception of former Rep. Davis, MSNBC did not omit any speeches that Fox News did not also omit.
Conservatives could make a case that MSNBC’s Davis omission was wrongheaded because of it being the important “Zell Miller” moment of this year’s RNC (and because the network will likely air Charlie Crist‘s DNC speech). If anything, the omission of Davis’ speech should what conservatives focus on.
But to accuse the cable network of purposely omitting minority speeches to further a “racist” narrative is just outright false when confronted with the facts. And assigning “purposeful” omission to MSNBC is especially wrong when they covered the speeches almost exactly the same way Fox did.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-falsely-accused-of-purposely-omitting-minority-republican-speeches/
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
So let me see if we have this straight... Fox News, who you claim is a mouthpiece for the party of 'rich white racists', did a better job of covering minority speeches than MSNBC, but since it was only marginally better by one black guy, it's okay that MSNBC covered NO minority speeches?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and another assumer reveals itself.So you're saying all who are 'born' in Kentucky are inbred, then?
This is very true.
I thought I met Dixie the other day in Provincetown Mass.
I was discussing politics on the dock with local fishermen, specifically over-regulation.
A gaunt ghoulish looking fellow was listening to my oration and when I stopped he quietly asked me who the folks I was addressing would be voting for.
I turned to face him and quietly assured him most poor people vote conservative.
He heartily agreed then said "what about these people?" Realising he was a cracker and thinking quickly I said "what you mean the queers?"
At this point he had pulled me out of earshot of any others. I followed along since I am fascinated by morbid mental pathology.
I asked him where he was from and learned it was Alabama. He assured me his entire region was not going to vote for the "incumbent" (not his word choice.)
He then asked how we deal with "these folks" (homosexuals).
I told him how we used to beat them until such beatings became civil rights infractions.
He seemed satified with that and wandered off.
No, Oath-man. When Howey mentioned your mother being inbred, your response was:
You're the one that made the distinction that inbreds had to be born there, not me.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Lol, you should have just dropped it and slunk away, this is weak.
The networks did what they did for whatever reasons, and your pathetic attempt to make it racism shows how desperate you are.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
No, actually, you should have slit your wrists back in 1980 and deprived us all of your stupidity... but that doesn't matter now.
MSNBC made the conscious choice to not broadcast the minority speeches at the RNC Tuesday. If Fox had done this to the Democrats, you would still be screaming racism at the top of your lungs about it. But since it was MSNBC being racist, and it was done to Republicans in an effort to portray a meme about Republicans being "an all white party" then you're perfectly okay with it. This is because you are a two-faced hypocrite bigot, who doesn't see your own racism and doesn't think anyone else can see it either.
You are only fooling yourself, fool.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you still think i'm a republican Rune?
Why does she live in Kentucky if she is in the Texas Militia? That's stupid.
As an aside, I would like to say that I am deeply disapointed in your choice of language in this thread.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Slit her wrist, you pathetic dolt, crawl back into the cesspool. And post modern, your thanking this post is most unChristian.
You two are disgusting excuses for human beings.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
It will get worse. And then Obama will win. Best to take off the day after the election and not return till the new year. There is going to be a nuclear level meltdown.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
So you're saying all who are 'born' in Kentucky are inbred, then?
Yes.