Democrats were pissed off about Clinton being so stupid. But Clinton wasn’t lying about Russian connections, he was lying about consensual sex. Clinton was not a pathological narcissistic ruler, Trump is
Right Wing Repugnants Once Argued Moral Grounds For Impeachment
- Thread starter Old Trapper
- Start date
Democrats were pissed off about Clinton being so stupid. But Clinton wasn’t lying about Russian connections, he was lying about consensual sex. Clinton was not a pathological narcissistic ruler, Trump is
Everybody is is subject to the social consequences of their actions. But when another person chooses to be intolerant and hateful toward someone because they have a different choice in elections or a different policy preference, that person has no business imposing negative consequences on another person. He is free to do so, but he is also contributing to a degradation of society and humanity.
If you go out to eat and people gather around you and taunt you because you voted for Bernie, those people have psychological problems unrelated to politics. They think their views are so much better than anyone else they think they have to demonstrate their superiority over Bernie voters, gays, minorities, immigrants, liberals, conservatives, or whatever other groups they need to feel superior to. They are like celebrities who think their political views are somehow more important than the average person.
cawacko
Well-known member
Can you back your assertion that most conservatives are against gay marriage with data?
I posted multiple articles from multiple sources on the pension problem. That you choose to ignore them doesn't mean I didn't present data.
That does not negate the point I was making--that both sides are going to defend their side and attack the other. Whether the evidence supports their side more than the other is not relevant. You side strongly with your family whether they are right or wrong.
And conservatives would make just the opposite argument--that Trump is better than Clinton.
Only if you use reverse logic. As I demonstrated, you could reverse the argument about who reacted first and get a completely different result.
And, you either fail to see your false logic or you know what you are doing and just trying to argue your point. Your strong partisanship colors your reality and logic.
Yes. Hating people drives them more toward those that will defend them (like prison gangs).
Many times those people change and preach against what they stood for, but that didn't happen through hate.
Read: White American Youth: My Descent into America's Most Violent Hate Movement--and How I Got Out
Again, your logic fails you. There is nothing intolerant and hateful about a person owning a gun. So, the intolerance and bigotry originates with the liberal because he can't stand it if a person owns a gun (even if it is unloaded and locked in a safe). The gun owner was not intolerant and did not hate anyone.
Everybody doesn't have to be a hateful bigot--only those who think their views are so morally superior they hate anyone who doesn't see their brilliance.
Criminal laws are not meant to be tolerant. They criminalize behavior society chooses to prevent. Murder and rape laws are not tolerant. If we don't like those laws preventing abortion we can file suit like Sarah Weddington seeking to overturn those laws. It is because we are intolerant of the current situation.
You are attempting to switch the intolerance from conservatives to laws. Anti-abortion people were happy with the laws (or the power of states to make law). It was liberals who were intolerant. A woman only has a choice today for the first two trimesters in most states.
If I am a white female or Asian and I am denied a place in law school even though my GPA and LSAT was higher than a Hispanic applicant, the intolerance is toward me because somebody does not think I deserve a place in that class regardless of my hard work. They are intolerant toward me and my (misguided) reaction of hatred toward them is a reaction against their bigotry.
You are using the self-serving argument that anything you disagree with is intolerance and bigotry and therefore you are reacting against the bigotry of the other side. That wouldn't pass a logic class.
Go to the source. The event was cancelled. I tried to keep the pasted material short. But whether it was cancelled or just relocated, it was because of the threat of protests and security issues by intolerant protesters who wanted to block the speech.
Nice excuse. You are dumb as a rock..
moon
Satire for Sanity
Says the captain of the ship with no name who thinks that a newspaper headline is a ' source' Haw, haw.....haw.
Learn to tuck your chin in, bully-boy.
Still trying to save face huh? Guess what Goon. Yours has been torn off.
You consider anyone that sees right through your bullshit as a "bully". STFU.
moon
Satire for Sanity
You don't bully me , sneak- but your attitude to others is repugnant.
I like taking you down.
Name that ship.
Captain Sailor;
Nothing personal- just girl whips oaf.
Yawn. So let me get this straight. You are admitting your lied about knowing what ships deliver cargo to Palestine, when they do it etc, etc. Right? You are also admitting your duck pond boat "merchant marine" is non existent? That is the only way you could not know. As far as you being a "girl", a post op that ran out of money, maybe. You are confused like that.