Right Wing Repugnants Once Argued Moral Grounds For Impeachment

Flash said:
You are truly dense. I was not referring to any specific case. However, if you don't think speakers have been blocked on college campuses for opposing affirmative action you are not very well informed.
Click to expand...

LOL! You're the one who lacks details and you say I'm uninformed. LOL. OK, bruh.
 
cawacko said:
Actually to your number 2, broken down by race, blacks by far voted the most for Prop 8 at 70%.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and they did so because of religion, which is just another example of bigotry.

But your argument was that it was "liberals" who voted for it. Clearly, not the case.

So you're trying to say black people are synonymous with liberals. So you're actually being bigoted there.
 
cawacko said:
Now overall they are a much smaller total of the state population wise but they live in the Bay Area, LA and SD. Coastal areas. So unless you want to tell me most blacks in California are Republican once again you are wrong and don't understand my state. You know who the second largest group to support Prop 8 was? Hispanics. I'll let you in on a secret. Very few Hispanics in California vote Republican. (see Prop 187). So you can cuss and name call all you want but it doesn't change those facts.
Click to expand...

All that does is show the power of religious bigotry.
 
cawacko said:
Actually to your number 2, broken down by race, blacks by far voted the most for Prop 8 at 70%. Now overall they are a much smaller total of the state population wise but they live in the Bay Area, LA and SD. Coastal areas. So unless you want to tell me most blacks in California are Republican once again you are wrong and don't understand my state. You know who the second largest group to support Prop 8 was? Hispanics. I'll let you in on a secret. Very few Hispanics in California vote Republican. (see Prop 187). So you can cuss and name call all you want but it doesn't change those facts.
Click to expand...

So we have come quite a loooonnnnnnng way from your argument that CA is bigoted because back in 2008, they narrowly voted against gay marriage. So your argument has shifted its goalposts a couple times now, just FYI.
 
LV426 said:
Yeah, and they did so because of religion, which is just another example of bigotry.

But your argument was that it was "liberals" who voted for it. Clearly, not the case.

So you're trying to say black people are synonymous with liberals. So you're actually being bigoted there.
Click to expand...
Bravo. That's some impressive spin. A hat tip to you sir
 
LV426 said:
So we have come quite a loooonnnnnnng way from your argument that CA is bigoted because back in 2008, they narrowly voted against gay marriage. So your argument has shifted its goalposts a couple times now, just FYI.
Click to expand...

My argument hasn't changed at all. If you choose not to follow and understand that's on you. I'm giving you facts that you don't understand seeing as how you aren't from here and clearly don't understand the political dynamics of the state.
 
LV426 said:
Right, just like I said...you made this shit up.

So for someone who screeched like a barnyard animal about "accepting truths", you sure do a lot of generalized, ambivalent, ambiguous make-believe, don't you?

You literally had to invent a scenario in order to maintain a moral relativism argument.

Bitch move.
Click to expand...

Do some research. If you don't think there have been campus protests over speakers opposing affirmative action you must have been under a rock the last 40 years. And protests against "affirmative action bake sales." And there have been many protests against other speakers on various topic (Condoleza Rice, Kissinger) including many who have been uninvited as graduation speakers because of protests. You don't know about any of this stuff??
 
LV426 said:
Because guns kill people.
Click to expand...

Duh. You keep diverting from the real question because you know it refutes your argument. What if the person is a liberal who only bought a gun for target practice? Why should another liberal be intolerant and hate the person because he chose to buy a gun?
It is intolerance and hatred initiated by a liberal that was not a reaction to intolerance and hatred by the gun owner.

And how does the fact that buying a gun was a choice possibly make any difference to this question? It was an illogical and irrational response
 
LV426 said:
Why? Because he's choosing to put others in danger to satisfy his own selfish need for security.
Click to expand...

But you said liberals are only intolerant and hate because it is a response to conservative intolerance and hate. There was no conservative intolerance and hate in this case.

You take the circular argument that anything a conservative (or liberal) does that you do not like is intolerance and should be met with intolerance and hatred.

Is having a military with weapons a "selfish need for security"?
 
Flash said:
Do some research. If you don't think there have been campus protests over speakers opposing affirmative action you must have been under a rock the last 40 years. And protests against "affirmative action bake sales." And there have been many protests against other speakers on various topic (Condoleza Rice, Kissinger) including many who have been uninvited as graduation speakers because of protests. You don't know about any of this stuff??
Click to expand...

OK, so you're shifting the goalposts again.

First you said they were prevented from speaking, now you're saying they are not being prevented from speaking, just that they're facing protests as they do.

How much more do you want to move the goalposts in this debate before you end up completely off the playing field?
 
Flash said:
Duh. You keep diverting from the real question because you know it refutes your argument. What if the person is a liberal who only bought a gun for target practice? Why should another liberal be intolerant and hate the person because he chose to buy a gun?
Click to expand...

Who buys gun "for target practice"? This is yet another goalpost shift.

Buying a gun should result in social consequences.


It is intolerance and hatred initiated by a liberal that was not a reaction to intolerance and hatred by the gun owner.
Click to expand...

Intolerance and hatred of the lives and safety of other people...that's what owning a gun is.
 
Flash said:
And how does the fact that buying a gun was a choice possibly make any difference to this question? It was an illogical and irrational response
Click to expand...

Because it's a choice. It's something you're choosing to do. You're not inherently a gun owner; you choose to become one. So you should face social consequences for doing so.

You seem to be arguing that no one should have to face social consequences for their actions, which gets to the entitlement complex you have.
 
Flash said:
But you said liberals are only intolerant and hate because it is a response to conservative intolerance and hate. There was no conservative intolerance and hate in this case.
Click to expand...

Sure there is!

Intolerance and hate of the lives and safety of everyone else.

Buying a gun tells the world you are intolerant and hateful of the lives of others.
 
Flash said:
ou take the circular argument that anything a conservative (or liberal) does that you do not like is intolerance and should be met with intolerance and hatred.
Click to expand...

So again, you are arguing that it's unfair for people to face social consequences of their actions.

That's entitlement, bruh.
 
LV426 said:
Sure there is!

Intolerance and hate of the lives and safety of everyone else.

Buying a gun tells the world you are intolerant and hateful of the lives of others.
Click to expand...

The number can vary but I've seen about 25% of Americans own guns. If accurate it's your belief that 1/4th of the country is intolerant on that basis alone?
 
LV426 said:
1. The first link is an Op-Ed.
2. The second link doesn't say he was prevented from speaking; in fact, it says he chose to leave the Board of Regents.
Click to expand...

An op-ed which discussed campus protests against speakers or activities they opposed.

I'm not talking about leaving the Board of Regents but protests blocking his attempt to speak.

"About 250 students jammed the student union to protest the speech. The students, about half of them black and half white, chanted, ``No university without diversity,'' and pumped signs denouncing Connerly's message."

https://www.wral.com/news/local/story/167547/

I can't believe I am having to give history lessons. See the Foundation of Individual Liberty in Education (FIRE). They list many cases from the left and right about attempts to block campus freedoms

https://www.thefire.org/category/cases/free-speech/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top