Right Wing Repugnants Once Argued Moral Grounds For Impeachment

I believe that was a point I made in an earlier post, and in earlier threads. And I apologize for the misleading title to the thread. My reference of thought was in regards to the hypocrisy of the pseudo-Evangelicals, and their moral hypocrisy. As I pointed out in other places before the election, a group that claims to be carrying the mantle of Christ cannot then ignore any of the commands given by that very same personage. How then do they stand on any moral grounds and condemn abortions, homosexuality, etc. They cannot for they have accepted the fact that there is no moral basis to their choices.

There is one very significant difference between the two politically though. No one can now deny that it is the Democrats that represent the people, and the Republicans that support the aristocratic elite.

The Democrats don't represent me. I'm white, male, and earn my own way. Democrats don't like that.
 
Actually what the Democrats, or pretty much anyone else doesn't like about you is you are a racist moron.
The Democrats don't represent me. I'm white, male, and earn my own way. Democrats don't like that.
 
Actually what the Democrats, or pretty much any doesn't like about you is you are a racist moron.

Thanks for admitting Democrats don't like white people that support themselves.

I don't really care what a n-loving piece of trash like you thinks, boy. Pucker up, that's what Democrats expect, and get, from you.
 
There is one very significant difference between the two politically though. No one can now deny that it is the Democrats that represent the people, and the Republicans that support the aristocratic elite.

I think that is somewhat simplistic. It worked for the Democrats to portray that image since most people are not aristocratic elites. But now the Democrats are those elites and brag about it. We have seen hundreds of posts claiming those voting for Clinton were the educated versus the "uneducated" Trump voters. Whether this is true is irrelevant---what is important is the the white working class realized they were being called deplorables and voted against those denigrating them.
 
I think that is somewhat simplistic. It worked for the Democrats to portray that image since most people are not aristocratic elites. But now the Democrats are those elites and brag about it. We have seen hundreds of posts claiming those voting for Clinton were the educated versus the "uneducated" Trump voters. Whether this is true is irrelevant---what is important is the the white working class realized they were being called deplorables and voted against those denigrating them.

How can that be when Clinton still won the popular vote? Why do right wingers continue to refuse to accept that very reality? And when one takes an honest look at those who support Trump (QAnon, White Supremacists, KKK, Russians, etc.) how can one honestly say they are not "deplorable"? All the "White Working Class" proved is that they lack integrity, moral values, and intelligence.

BTW, an aristocratic class is rarely the majority of the people, and I doubt you could come close to proving that the Democrat Party is now the "aristocrat" class. Educated does not make you aristocratic.

Then too, all you have to do is look at the posts of ardent Trump supporters like TruthDetector, CFM, Countryboy, and others, to understand that truth, integrity, and intelligence, is not required for the Trump supporter.
 
I was born and raised in an uber conservative area by evangelicals. I have no idea how my Mother and nearly all my friends and relatives can be Trumpsters. I truly don't get it.

let me help you out, nut-bag

if I am looking for moral leadership from a politician, or hoping a politician is a moral compass for my kids, then I am a pretty sad individual.

I want my politicians, especially my President to do what is good for America, protect our borders, our cash, and above all make sure that any nut-job that has ideas like 9-11 knows he better tread lightly. Mean what you say and say what you mean.

So just maybe your "Mother and nearly all your friends and relatives" are onto something.
couldn't possibly be you are the one that's wrong, huh?
What are you like 13? that's a typical response from a teenager, "what do old people know".

Here try this, go to one of them and try to explain your support for Hillary, and listen to how stupid you sound, might work.
 
Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans were all "I don't care about morals or family values - just give me results."

The script has officially been flipped.
 
I guess BIG type is in. I have to laugh at all the immoral leftist hypocrites suddenly believing that they can lecture the right about morality. It is priceless. The same clueless morons who defended BillyBob Clinton's predatory behavior IN the White House now want to preach to us about how bad Trump is.

Sorry you low information dullards, BillyBob treated his women like dirt and having sex with your interns is just incredibly poor judgement. Nothing Trump has done can compare.

So do everyone a favor and STFU; we know you are too stupid to comprehend the massive difference.

P.S. The same goes for "experience" and "deficits." After supporting a guy with NO experience and who engaged in record breaking deficit spending.


giphy.gif
 
Oh and P.S. for you low information dullards on the left; Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with the intern, even though he should have been, he was impeached for LYING under OATH.

Morons.
 
Very true. Republicans attacked Clinton and Democrats defended him. Now, Democrats attack Trump and Republicans defend him. Sounds like politics.

Except Republicans have claimed to be the moral majority religious values family values brand, not Dems. Not the same at all. Dems are not claiming the mantle of religious values conservative, attacking Trump to be sure on any front available, including hypocrisy of his faithful. Meanwhile Giuliani is saying stormy should not be believed because she is an immoral woman.
 
Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans were all "I don't care about morals or family values - just give me results."

The script has officially been flipped.

That's your take?
wow, you ARE a cupcake.

no, read my post, I don't need moral leadership from a politician, I am my own person that way.
that you seek that is very very telling.

Do you have a local church or pastor you could confide in if your life is in such turmoil,
I just don't think you should be looking to, well Hillary I guess is your "comparative" in argument, for moral support.
Do you steal? lust for thy neighbor?, watch kiddie porn? maybe we here in JPP could help
 
Except Republicans have claimed to be the moral majority religious values family values brand, not Dems. Not the same at all. Dems are not claiming the mantle of religious values conservative, attacking Trump to be sure on any front available, including hypocrisy of his faithful. Meanwhile Giuliani is saying stormy should not be believed because she is an immoral woman.

And you guys have taken the opposite position that morality is meaningless

So, you guys have no room to bitch when people take your advice.
 
I was born and raised in an uber conservative area by evangelicals. I have no idea how my Mother and nearly all my friends and relatives can be Trumpsters. I truly don't get it.

Hmmmmm....perhaps it is because they have brains and you don't? :rofl2:
 
Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans were all "I don't care about morals or family values - just give me results."

The script has officially been flipped.

Republicans act more like democrats and that's a fucking problem now? Why would people make any attempt to come to other aisle when it's as pointless as you've demonstrated?
 
Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans were all "I don't care about morals or family values - just give me results."

The script has officially been flipped.

Republicans act more like democrats and that's a fucking problem now? Why would people make any attempt to come to other aisle when it's as pointless as you've demonstrated?
 
Very true. Republicans attacked Clinton and Democrats defended him. Now, Democrats attack Trump and Republicans defend him. Sounds like politics.

Republicans didn't "attack" BillyBob Clinton other than his banging women left and right and his and Hillary's corrupt behavior attacking those women.

BillyBob, after losing the House and the Senate like ObamaTard did, worked WITH the Republicans who set the agenda for the next six years leading to economic expansion and job growth and actually balancing the Federal budget for thew first time in decades. It actually worked quite well for BillyBob and the Republican controlled congress.

The smarmy, arrogant Obama; not so smart.
 
That's your take?
wow, you ARE a cupcake.

no, read my post, I don't need moral leadership from a politician, I am my own person that way.
that you seek that is very very telling.

Do you have a local church or pastor you could confide in if your life is in such turmoil,
I just don't think you should be looking to, well Hillary I guess is your "comparative" in argument, for moral support.
Do you steal? lust for thy neighbor?, watch kiddie porn? maybe we here in JPP could help

Where did I say I seek it? Verbiage, please.
 
Back
Top