Richard Dawkins banned from US radio station over comments about Muslims

archives said:
Why? They, and keep in mind it is a radio program, scheduled him, and upon later review didn't like something he said, and was canceled, that's their prerogative

Tiger Woods gets picked up for DWI and loses sponsorship appearances, how is it any different?
Click to expand...

DUI = Bad
Criticizing an enemy of the West = Good
 
archives said:
Why? They, and keep in mind it is a radio program, scheduled him, and upon later review didn't like something he said, and was canceled, that's their prerogative

Tiger Woods gets picked up for DWI and loses sponsorship appearances, how is it any different?
Click to expand...

DUI is many things. Speech isn't one of them.

Progressives have little regard for free speech---as a principle of democracy.
 
archives said:
California seceding would take with it over 14% of the Nation's GDP, who is going to make up the difference, Wyoming?
Click to expand...
And by that logic CA would lose 86% of it's GDP. Other countries do just fine with that. Maybe if CA seceded, the U.S. and CA could be on friendly terms. As of now CA is practically an enemy of most of the rest of the U.S.
 
Last edited:
From a leftist and multi-cultural perspective Western Society is considered bad so therefore it is extremely frowned upon to criticize Islam in any form as Dawkins did.
 
only in America would the idiot academic community cheer for an avowed atheist who has slandered people for a belief in a supernatural omnipotent being, then get all faux outraged for that same individual slandering another group for their belief in a supernatural omnipotent being........
 
Oh poor Dr Richard Dawkins!

He's been thinking this ever since June 5, 1968 ---when RFK was assassinated by The Forgotten Palestinian Terrorist Sirhan Sirhan.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
only in America would the idiot academic community cheer for an avowed atheist who has slandered people for a belief in a supernatural omnipotent being, then get all faux outraged for that same individual slandering another group for their belief in a supernatural omnipotent being........
Click to expand...

link
 
no


prove who supports him and who doesnt


you made the claim


dont make claims you cant back


its what decent people do
 
SmarterthanYou said:
only in America would the idiot academic community cheer for an avowed atheist who has slandered people for a belief in a supernatural omnipotent being, then get all faux outraged for that same individual slandering another group for their belief in a supernatural omnipotent being........
Click to expand...



this guy is a jerk


not because hes atheist but because he a right wing eliteist


I am an atheist and never held him in high reguard.


every time I try to exxplain what I believe to a believer they get all upset and say Im trashing their religion



they seem to think atheist should NEVER be nallowed to discuss what they believe


there in no proof on the fce of the earth that gods or monsters exist


I want proof of things


I cant believe just because someone tried to hammer it into my brain froim all side of society


there is nothingwrong with not believing


there is nothing wrong with talking about my non belief


quit lying about what people believe to pretend your more worthy of life
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top