Reuters Admits: “No Evidence of Collusion” Between Trump and Russia

G

Granule

Firebrand
A Reuters report detailing how Trump campaign advisers were in contact with Russia during the last 7 months of the campaign admits that there was no evidence of collusion between the two parties to influence the election, dismantling the left’s entire Russian narrative.

Although presented as another major scoop designed to damage Trump, the article, which is based on intelligence sources, completely vindicates him.

“Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump’s campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told Reuters.”

However, the true substance of the story is buried down in paragraph six.

“The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far,” states the report.

No collusion between Trump and Russia. Let that sink in.

https://www.infowars.com/reuters-admits-no-evidence-of-collusion-between-trump-and-russia/


But will that stop the shameless assholes? Fuuuuuuck NO!!! ;)
 
Who says Trump/Russia colluded? The DNC, that's who. Because that's who hacked their computers. Says the DNC.

Seth Rich was his name.
 
Granule said:
A Reuters report detailing how Trump campaign advisers were in contact with Russia during the last 7 months of the campaign admits that there was no evidence of collusion between the two parties to influence the election, dismantling the left’s entire Russian narrative.

Although presented as another major scoop designed to damage Trump, the article, which is based on intelligence sources, completely vindicates him.

“Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump’s campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told Reuters.”

However, the true substance of the story is buried down in paragraph six.

“The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far,” states the report.

No collusion between Trump and Russia. Let that sink in.

https://www.infowars.com/reuters-admits-no-evidence-of-collusion-between-trump-and-russia/


But will that stop the shameless assholes? Fuuuuuuck NO!!! ;)
Click to expand...

lol

Ignorant hopefull twatwaddle. Infowars? What an imbecile.

Here's a portion of the Reuters article:

"Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak accelerated after the Nov. 8 vote as the two discussed establishing a back channel for communication between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that could bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations, four current U.S. officials said."

I am SO looking forward the SP investigation.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Ignorant hopefull twatwaddle. Infowars? What an imbecile.

Here's a portion of the Reuters article:

"Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak accelerated after the Nov. 8 vote as the two discussed establishing a back channel for communication between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that could bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations, four current U.S. officials said."

I am SO looking forward the SP investigation.
Click to expand...

Infowars quoting REUTERS, Mr. Literate.
 
GazzaQueen said:
Who says Trump/Russia colluded? The DNC, that's who. Because that's who hacked their computers. Says the DNC.

Seth Rich was his name.
Click to expand...

Hillary perfected her skills on Vince Foster and others before she got to Rich.

Ass Taster, you are a chronically consistent little anal wart, I must say.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Ignorant hopefull twatwaddle. Infowars? What an imbecile.

Here's a portion of the Reuters article:

"Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak accelerated after the Nov. 8 vote as the two discussed establishing a back channel for communication between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that could bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations, four current U.S. officials said."

I am SO looking forward the SP investigation.
Click to expand...
Uh-uh-uh. You forgot this part:

Despite no evidence whatsoever having been presented of Trump or anyone on his campaign colluding with Russia to influence the election, the deep state and the Democratic establishment is intensifying its effort to portray Trump as illegitimate.

So, pussy. Where's the evidence?

I'm looking forward to the SP investigation too! It'll be like:

Q. So, dumbasses, where's your evidence?

A. Uh, we don't have any, but we really want this! *CRY*

lol
 
domer76 said:
lol

Ignorant hopefull twatwaddle. Infowars? What an imbecile.

Here's a portion of the Reuters article:

"Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak accelerated after the Nov. 8 vote as the two discussed establishing a back channel for communication between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that could bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations, four current U.S. officials said."

I am SO looking forward the SP investigation.
Click to expand...

You realize they were talking about post-election communication, right.

Post-election, communications. Let it sink in.
 
Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak accelerated after the Nov. 8 vote as the two discussed establishing a back channel for communication between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that could bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations, four current U.S. officials said.
Click to expand...
Damn straight. IC incidental collections coupled with leaking?
I'd be doing the same
 
"People who reported the conversions said..."

We are finally going to find out after a real investigation. The question then is why did Flynn lie about the money he took and why did he lie to Pence?

It does not even matter anymore, Rump tried to shut down the investigation... that is a crime.
 
“The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far,” states the report.
Click to expand...

So that's what the droolers who've been yapping about proof of everything harmful to Trump call "proof" of the opposite???? :lolup:

Your desperation is fun to watch!!! :awesome:
 
Jarod said:
"People who reported the conversions said..."

We are finally going to find out after a real investigation. The question then is why did Flynn lie about the money he took and why did he lie to Pence?

It does not even matter anymore, Rump tried to shut down the investigation... that is a crime.
Click to expand...

Nomad said:
So that's what the droolers who've been yapping about proof of everything harmful to Trump call "proof" of the opposite???? :lolup:

Your desperation is fun to watch!!! :awesome:
Click to expand...

Argue with beloved leader, Maxine Waters.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/18/maxine_waters_no_actual_evidence_yet_but_connecting_the_dots_will_lead_to_trump_impeachment.html
 
No longer needed.
If election collusion is never mentioned again there is enough evidence on Trump to impeach him based solely on what he did with Flynn, Comey and the Russian visitors to the oval office...

LMFAO
 
never, ever , ever a shred of any scintillia of evidence of Russian collusion..
It was all Clintonistas excuses for her loss hyped up by the media, and parlayed by running dog politicians.

I've really never seen anything like this..the perfect storm of hyper-partisanship coupled with fake news amplified by hysterical Russia phobia

This country has become bizarre. It's like a return to McCarthyism
 
anatta said:
never, ever , ever a shred of any scintillia of evidence of Russian collusion..
It was all Clintonistas excuses for her loss hyped up by the media, and parlayed by running dog politicians.

I've really never seen anything like this..the perfect storm of hyper-partisanship coupled with fake news amplified by hysterical Russia phobia

This country has become bizarre. It's like a return to McCarthyism
Click to expand...

The old adage "where there's smoke there's fire" applies here.

You choose to ignore the smoke or attribute it to media bias, etc, etc.

But that's​ your choice.
 
anatta said:
never, ever , ever a shred of any scintillia of evidence of Russian collusion..
It was all Clintonistas excuses for her loss hyped up by the media, and parlayed by running dog politicians.

I've really never seen anything like this..the perfect storm of hyper-partisanship coupled with fake news amplified by hysterical Russia phobia

This country has become bizarre. It's like a return to McCarthyism
Click to expand...

There was never a shred of evidence against the Clinton's in the WhiteWater probe, but it still resulted in Bill Clinton's impeachment.

As a result of the report turned over by Whitewater special prosecutor Ken Star.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
There was never a shred of evidence against the Clinton's in the WhiteWater probe, but it still resulted in Bill Clinton's impeachment.
Click to expand...

Uncle Perv was not impeached over Whitewater.

No wonder you people have eaten such massive losses over the past several years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top