Researcher Tied to Wuhan Lab Thanked Fauci for Dismissing Lab-Leak Theory

Grokmaster said:
AND WHY THE CORON-A-CRATS TOLD EVERYONE TO "GET OUTSIDE"..IOW:"SPREAD IT"...
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 


IN LATE FEBRUARY ,2020....DOING THE CHINESE'S BIDDING, AFTER DERIDING TRUMP'S CHINA TRAVEL BAN....OVER 400,000 CHINESE FROM WUHAN WERE SENT HERE TO SPREAD THE VIRUS BEFORE THE BAN....DEMOCRATS WERE MORE THAN WILLING TO HELP THE CHINESE OUT...
 
Grokmaster said:
REST ASSURED...THE CORON-A-CRATS ARE DOING EVERYTHNG THEY CAN TO KEEP THEIR BELOVED PANDEMIC GOING....
Click to expand...

yeah, that is what all those vaccines are intended to do. I have to wonder if you are just a constant liar or that dishonest. I have not dealt with whether you are sane or not. That can be a serious question too.
 
ExpressLane said:
It won them the White House. No wonder why China unleased it.
Click to expand...

When the CCP Virus came along democrats saw their window of opportunity and they seized on it.

In early February of 2020 democrats were on the ropes; their second impeachment failed to remove Trump; the end to the Obama malaise had come and the economy was strong; jobs numbers were good.

The democrat ‘contenders’ for the WH had names like Pocahontas, Mayor Pete and Kamala Harris that was stuck at 2%. An actual socialist that scared even the democrats establishment and a washed up relic from Delaware.

Things we’re looking pretty bad for the democrats. Then it happened. A virus gets sent over [literally] from China. From that moment on, democrats and their army of activist/journalists were going to pin the tail on the Trump donkey. It took inflating the death tally; constant drumbeat of panic porn from the media; suppressing inconvenient facts like ridiculously inaccurate PCR testing; taking the unprecedented step of shutting down the economy—and therefore taking Trump’s strongest card out of his hand before the election.

And finally, suppressing inconvenient facts surrounding the origin of the CCP Virus. It’s arguable that the whole lot of them should be tarred and feathered for doing it, but democrats, Big Tech and the democrat media played it wonderfully.

They would do well to hope political karma isn’t an actual thing.
 
Darth Omar said:
When the moon sized asteroid was seen on a collision course with earth democrats saw their window of opportunity and they seized on it and Republican shoved their beaks in the sand and denied it.

.
Click to expand...

fixed it for you. :rolleyes:

You need to get your tiny dome around the fact that you people are fucking stupid and we will ALWAYS make a better choices because of it you west VA brainwashed retard.
 
FAUCI COVERED FOR THE CHINESE AND HIS COHORTS.

NO CONCERN FOR THE INNOCENT LISTENING TO HIS BULLSHIT.


FAUCI LIED...MILLIONS DIED...
 
You would think by now even the JPP left would see how appalling the media is and how willing they are to tell bald faced lies.

For a full year, the official media narrative was that there was “‘Exactly Zero’ Evidence Covid-19 Came From a Lab.” (That from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy in May 2020) To suggest any such evidence might exist was a pure conspiracy theory. The scientific community had come to a consensus on the subject, one that had been fact checked by multiple independent news sources such as the Washington Post and Politifact. Facebook and Instagram flagged Tucker Carlson’s interview with a Chinese virologist who said the virus did not come from nature as “containing false evidence about Covid-19.” They view it as their duty to protect us from such falsehoods: leaving that information on the internet without qualifiers would recklessly contribute to the spread of misinformation.

It’s funny how many big news stories, especially those that may be politically sensitive, get framed with this type of hyperbolic language: “Fact-checked. We are absolutely certain, without a doubt, that there’s nothing more to see here.” That’s especially true if the story might lead a remotely curious person to question the official narrative. Stories such as Russia collusion, the Hunter Biden laptop, and voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election. They pull the curtain closed to hide the truth and proceed to an elaborate song and dance number. Months or a year later, when the political tensions have dissipated or become irrelevant, then we’re allowed to have access to the information -- or, at least more of it. Maybe they’re hoping we’ve stopped paying attention by then.

But that makes it more important than ever that we keep paying attention. In the case of the Covid-19 lab leak, there is an abundance of articles from last year to this year that show the media’s 180 degree pivot. Not only do these articles make the media gaslighting obvious, they intensify my own sense that we are living in a censored environment that has many characteristics of an authoritarian regime.

A year ago, when the pandemic first began, a person could be accused of racism against the Chinese for even mentioning that there is a virology lab in Wuhan. Just two days ago, NYT science writer Apoorva Mandavilli deleted a tweet that said, “Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots.”

Here are some natural questions that might arise in this situation that one might expect journalism to address: Is it just a pure coincidence that there is a virology lab in the town where the disease arose? Did that lab just happen to be studying the very kind of virus that causes the disease? Given these extraordinary coincidences, wouldn’t an investigation be expected? Isn’t an authoritarian institution like the Chinese Communist Party intensely focused on suppressing critical information that might make them look bad? Instead of addressing these questions, the mainstream press spent their time accusing President Trump of fueling conspiracies and listing the experts who disagreed with him and extolling their qualifications.

Here is a small sampling of those articles from 2020:

Vox (April 2020): Nearly A Third of Americans Believe a Conspiracy Theory about the Origins of Coronavirus

Forbes (May 2020): Fauci, Top U.S. General, Throw Cold Water on Trump’s Coronavirus Claim

Top line quote: “Two high ranking government officials — Dr. Anthony Fauci and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Mark Milley — pumped the brakes on the controversial theory COVID-19 originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, even as President Trump and other administration officials rally around the claim without any public evidence”

Washington Post Fact Check (May 2020): Was The Coronavirus Released from a Wuhan Lab

Claim: [By President Trump] I will tell you, more and more, we’re hearing the story [that the new coronavirus emerged from a Wuhan lab].”

Claimed by: Donald Trump

Fact check by The Washington Post: Doubtful

The Guardian (June 2020): Ignore the Conspiracy Theories: Scientists Know Covid-19 Wasn’t Created in a Lab

Excerpt: “Suggestions that Covid-19 is a manmade virus are the latest chapter in a tale of blame, misinformation and finger-pointing. Cue the conspiracy theorists, marching out their narrative about the high-security BSL-4 lab in Wuhan, where mysterious experiments to design ‘frankenviruses’ led to the tragic global pandemic. Cue the genetic analyses pointing to ‘unexpected’ insertions in the code of A, G, T, and C that explain how this virus could not have evolved naturally. Cue political posturing against China, with calls for an inquiry, trade sanctions and even reparations.”

The author of this piece is Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance which funded research experiments conducted by his collaborator Shi Zhengli, a virologist at the Wuhan Institute who specializes in SARS-like coronaviruses.

Politifact (September 2020): Tucker Carlson Guest Airs Debunked Conspiracy Theory That Covid-19 Was Created in a Lab

Their ruling: “The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!”

Business Insider (October 2020): 23% of Americans Think the Coronavirus was Created in a Chinese Lab. Here’s Why That Conspiracy Theory Is Bogus.

And one year later, May 2021, Politifact has retracted its factcheck “pending a more thorough review.” They’re not alone; across the news world, practically in unison, the media are suddenly willing to discuss the possibility that Covid-19 escaped from a lab and weigh the evidence. Is it because President Trump has been safely defeated for re-election, or because the truth has become just too obvious to suppress? Headlines from just the past few weeks:

Medium (May 2, 2021): Following the Origins of Covid

This article, by former New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade, is credited for opening Pandora’s box.

Business Insider (May 14, 2021): A Lab Leak in Wuhan Remains a Viable Theory for the Coronavirus Origin

Washington Post Opinion (May 6, 2021): Congress is Finally Investigating the Lab Accident Covid-19 Story

NY Post: The Theory That Covid-19 Escaped from a Lab May Not be So Far-Fetched

This one is also by Nicholas Wade, and notes Peter Daszak’s funding for coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and then shows how he tried to cover his own tracks.

Excerpt: “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” a group of virologists and others wrote in The Lancet on Feb. 19, 2020, when it was really far too soon for anyone to be sure what had happened…. It later turned out that the Lancet letter had been organized and drafted by Peter Daszak.

Where was this information a year ago and why did they hide it from us?

A person with natural curiosity will have questions about that too: was it so politically critical that the establishment remove Trump from office that whatever he said, they needed to dispute? Were our health functionaries, including Fauci, trying to cover their own butts regarding their involvement in coronavirus research? Are we in so deep with the Chinese that we are afraid to cross them?

The media have defended their fact-checkers and experts as the guardians against misinformation in our information-abundant world. They want us to listen to and trust the “authorities,” those who have access to more, and better, and possibly non-public information. But the media are actively creating the environment of distrust they continually bemoan. There are only so many times you can smear your dissenters as crazy conspiracy theorists, but then have to admit they might be right, before those people will start to assume that’s always the case.

A few days ago, David Frum wrote for The Atlantic that “Pro-Trumpers” are turning the “coronavirus lab-leak theory into a potent political tool.” He goes on to say that Republicans have no desire to seek the truth, and therefore the only way to beat the Republicans, who he argues are the only ones trying to politicize this situation, is to tell the truth. He writes: “if the truth is ambiguous, then it’s OK to say that too.”

I disagree with everything he wrote except for that last line: lay out the facts, tell us what you know and what you don’t know, then trust people to draw their own conclusions. Anytime the press is unwilling to do that, I start to suspect they have too much at stake. And then I want to know what’s behind the curtain.

It makes me wonder: how long will it be until we’re allowed to ask questions about the most secure election in U.S. history? The press has been dead wrong time and again, from the “Russia collusion” story to the Hunter Biden laptop. And now it’s the Covid-19 origins. They’ve blown a hole in their credibility each time. After this latest 180 degree pivot, the momentum is on our side. Let’s keep holding their feet to the fire until we get answers.
Click to expand...
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com...-media-blow-another-hole-in-their-credibility
 
Last edited:
Primavera said:
For a full year, the official media narrative was that there was “‘Exactly Zero’ Evidence Covid-19 Came From a Lab.” (That from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy in May 2020) To suggest any such evidence might exist was a pure conspiracy theory. The scientific community had come to a consensus on the subject, one that had been fact checked by multiple independent news sources such as the Washington Post and Politifact. Facebook and Instagram flagged Tucker Carlson’s interview with a Chinese virologist who said the virus did not come from nature as “containing false evidence about Covid-19.” They view it as their duty to protect us from such falsehoods: leaving that information on the internet without qualifiers would recklessly contribute to the spread of misinformation.

It’s funny how many big news stories, especially those that may be politically sensitive, get framed with this type of hyperbolic language: “Fact-checked. We are absolutely certain, without a doubt, that there’s nothing more to see here.” That’s especially true if the story might lead a remotely curious person to question the official narrative. Stories such as Russia collusion, the Hunter Biden laptop, and voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election. They pull the curtain closed to hide the truth and proceed to an elaborate song and dance number. Months or a year later, when the political tensions have dissipated or become irrelevant, then we’re allowed to have access to the information -- or, at least more of it. Maybe they’re hoping we’ve stopped paying attention by then.

But that makes it more important than ever that we keep paying attention. In the case of the Covid-19 lab leak, there is an abundance of articles from last year to this year that show the media’s 180 degree pivot. Not only do these articles make the media gaslighting obvious, they intensify my own sense that we are living in a censored environment that has many characteristics of an authoritarian regime.

A year ago, when the pandemic first began, a person could be accused of racism against the Chinese for even mentioning that there is a virology lab in Wuhan. Just two days ago, NYT science writer Apoorva Mandavilli deleted a tweet that said, “Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots.”

Here are some natural questions that might arise in this situation that one might expect journalism to address: Is it just a pure coincidence that there is a virology lab in the town where the disease arose? Did that lab just happen to be studying the very kind of virus that causes the disease? Given these extraordinary coincidences, wouldn’t an investigation be expected? Isn’t an authoritarian institution like the Chinese Communist Party intensely focused on suppressing critical information that might make them look bad? Instead of addressing these questions, the mainstream press spent their time accusing President Trump of fueling conspiracies and listing the experts who disagreed with him and extolling their qualifications.

Here is a small sampling of those articles from 2020:

Vox (April 2020): Nearly A Third of Americans Believe a Conspiracy Theory about the Origins of Coronavirus

Forbes (May 2020): Fauci, Top U.S. General, Throw Cold Water on Trump’s Coronavirus Claim

Top line quote: “Two high ranking government officials — Dr. Anthony Fauci and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Mark Milley — pumped the brakes on the controversial theory COVID-19 originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, even as President Trump and other administration officials rally around the claim without any public evidence”

Washington Post Fact Check (May 2020): Was The Coronavirus Released from a Wuhan Lab

Claim: [By President Trump] I will tell you, more and more, we’re hearing the story [that the new coronavirus emerged from a Wuhan lab].”

Claimed by: Donald Trump

Fact check by The Washington Post: Doubtful

The Guardian (June 2020): Ignore the Conspiracy Theories: Scientists Know Covid-19 Wasn’t Created in a Lab

Excerpt: “Suggestions that Covid-19 is a manmade virus are the latest chapter in a tale of blame, misinformation and finger-pointing. Cue the conspiracy theorists, marching out their narrative about the high-security BSL-4 lab in Wuhan, where mysterious experiments to design ‘frankenviruses’ led to the tragic global pandemic. Cue the genetic analyses pointing to ‘unexpected’ insertions in the code of A, G, T, and C that explain how this virus could not have evolved naturally. Cue political posturing against China, with calls for an inquiry, trade sanctions and even reparations.”

The author of this piece is Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance which funded research experiments conducted by his collaborator Shi Zhengli, a virologist at the Wuhan Institute who specializes in SARS-like coronaviruses.

Politifact (September 2020): Tucker Carlson Guest Airs Debunked Conspiracy Theory That Covid-19 Was Created in a Lab

Their ruling: “The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!”

Business Insider (October 2020): 23% of Americans Think the Coronavirus was Created in a Chinese Lab. Here’s Why That Conspiracy Theory Is Bogus.

And one year later, May 2021, Politifact has retracted its factcheck “pending a more thorough review.” They’re not alone; across the news world, practically in unison, the media are suddenly willing to discuss the possibility that Covid-19 escaped from a lab and weigh the evidence. Is it because President Trump has been safely defeated for re-election, or because the truth has become just too obvious to suppress? Headlines from just the past few weeks:

Medium (May 2, 2021): Following the Origins of Covid

This article, by former New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade, is credited for opening Pandora’s box.

Business Insider (May 14, 2021): A Lab Leak in Wuhan Remains a Viable Theory for the Coronavirus Origin

Washington Post Opinion (May 6, 2021): Congress is Finally Investigating the Lab Accident Covid-19 Story

NY Post: The Theory That Covid-19 Escaped from a Lab May Not be So Far-Fetched

This one is also by Nicholas Wade, and notes Peter Daszak’s funding for coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and then shows how he tried to cover his own tracks.

Excerpt: “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” a group of virologists and others wrote in The Lancet on Feb. 19, 2020, when it was really far too soon for anyone to be sure what had happened…. It later turned out that the Lancet letter had been organized and drafted by Peter Daszak.

Where was this information a year ago and why did they hide it from us?

A person with natural curiosity will have questions about that too: was it so politically critical that the establishment remove Trump from office that whatever he said, they needed to dispute? Were our health functionaries, including Fauci, trying to cover their own butts regarding their involvement in coronavirus research? Are we in so deep with the Chinese that we are afraid to cross them?

The media have defended their fact-checkers and experts as the guardians against misinformation in our information-abundant world. They want us to listen to and trust the “authorities,” those who have access to more, and better, and possibly non-public information. But the media are actively creating the environment of distrust they continually bemoan. There are only so many times you can smear your dissenters as crazy conspiracy theorists, but then have to admit they might be right, before those people will start to assume that’s always the case.

A few days ago, David Frum wrote for The Atlantic that “Pro-Trumpers” are turning the “coronavirus lab-leak theory into a potent political tool.” He goes on to say that Republicans have no desire to seek the truth, and therefore the only way to beat the Republicans, who he argues are the only ones trying to politicize this situation, is to tell the truth. He writes: “if the truth is ambiguous, then it’s OK to say that too.”

I disagree with everything he wrote except for that last line: lay out the facts, tell us what you know and what you don’t know, then trust people to draw their own conclusions. Anytime the press is unwilling to do that, I start to suspect they have too much at stake. And then I want to know what’s behind the curtain.

It makes me wonder: how long will it be until we’re allowed to ask questions about the most secure election in U.S. history? The press has been dead wrong time and again, from the “Russia collusion” story to the Hunter Biden laptop. And now it’s the Covid-19 origins. They’ve blown a hole in their credibility each time. After this latest 180 degree pivot, the momentum is on our side. Let’s keep holding their feet to the fire until we get answers.
Click to expand...

THEY COLLUDED WITH FAUCI/UN-WHO/CHINESE TO PULL THE WOOL OVER AMERICANS' EYES...
 
.

'Rare' genome sequencing almost certainly proves Covid WAS deliberately made in a Chinese lab before it leaked to the world: Another expert study makes bombshell claim


  • COVID-19 has the genome sequencing combination of 'CGG-CGG'
  • Two US experts say that no naturally occurring coronavirus has ever had that combination
  • The 'CGG-CGG' combination is extremely rare, except when it used by scientists doing 'gain-of-function' in laboratories
  • The experts conclude that it is more likely than not that the virus was therefore created in a lab
  • In recent weeks, many of the world's top scientists have pushed to determine whether the virus was leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology
Two U.S. experts have penned a damning essay saying that science strongly suggests the novel coronavirus was manufactured inside a Chinese laboratory.
The claim was made by Stephen Quay, CEO of biopharmaceutical company Atossa Therapeutics Inc, and Richard Muller, a physics professor at the University of California Berkeley, in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday. In the op-ed, the men say their proof lies in genome sequencing, or analyzing the DNA, of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.




https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ves-COVID-deliberately-lab-experts-claim.html
 
Primavera said:
.

'Rare' genome sequencing almost certainly proves Covid WAS deliberately made in a Chinese lab before it leaked to the world: Another expert study makes bombshell claim


  • COVID-19 has the genome sequencing combination of 'CGG-CGG'
  • Two US experts say that no naturally occurring coronavirus has ever had that combination
  • The 'CGG-CGG' combination is extremely rare, except when it used by scientists doing 'gain-of-function' in laboratories
  • The experts conclude that it is more likely than not that the virus was therefore created in a lab
  • In recent weeks, many of the world's top scientists have pushed to determine whether the virus was leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology
Two U.S. experts have penned a damning essay saying that science strongly suggests the novel coronavirus was manufactured inside a Chinese laboratory.
The claim was made by Stephen Quay, CEO of biopharmaceutical company Atossa Therapeutics Inc, and Richard Muller, a physics professor at the University of California Berkeley, in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday. In the op-ed, the men say their proof lies in genome sequencing, or analyzing the DNA, of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.




https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ves-COVID-deliberately-lab-experts-claim.html
Click to expand...

Yep...BUT FAUCI LIED TO COVER FOR THE CHINESE....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top