Republicans to Boehner: Stick it up your ass!

Obama has proposed $1.22 trillion in spending cuts. $800 billion represents cuts to programs, and $122 billion would come from slowing benefits on SS and other programs. Of the $800 billion, half would come from healthcare programs, $200 billion from mandatory programs like farm price supports, $100 billion from military spending, and $100 billion from discretionary domestic programs.

How ya like me now?
 
Obama has proposed $1.22 trillion in spending cuts. $800 billion represents cuts to programs, and $122 billion would come from slowing benefits on SS and other programs. Of the $800 billion, half would come from healthcare programs, $200 billion from mandatory programs like farm price supports, $100 billion from military spending, and $100 billion from discretionary domestic programs.

How ya like me now?

link up bitch
 
You're wrong, on all counts. The Democrats are offering spending cuts, to their most prized programs.

And you're wrong about people who voted for GOP Congressmen & Senators. They expect them to work together with Democrats on crisis situations, to come up with equitable solutions to the problems that face all of us as a nation. As for stealing weath, just watch what happens to wealth when the market tanks because the GOP refused to negotiate.

And watch who voters hold accountable for that. It won't be the side that was willing to meet halfway.

No, I am not wrong about it, and you can just keep on ignoring what I said and insisting you are right, it won't change facts. The Democrats have suggested "cuts" in the amount of automatic increase built-in to social entitlement programs, many of which need to be eliminated because they simply don't work. When you claim you're going to reduce the proposed 8% increase in funding to a 5% increase, that is simply NOT A CUT in spending. It is merely a reduction in increase. At the same time, you are also proposing trillions more in spending on new programs that aren't even in the budget yet, like Obamacare.

I'm not wrong about the sentiments of people I know who voted for Republicans. NONE of them expect or want their representatives to capitulate to the Marxists, they didn't vote for them to do that, and if they do so, will be thrown out of office for it. There is no negotiation on principles, you either have them or you don't. Raising taxes will not increase revenues, it's a stupid idea that even Obama admits will not work. It will result in LESS tax revenue and LESS economic prosperity, with FEWER jobs created. If you don't believe that, watch what happens when the massive tax increases happen as a result of going over the fiscal cliff!

As for who is held accountable, I don't care! I know that is a hard concept for you to grasp, being how your head is firmly up the ass of your political party here, but really.... as far as I'm concerned, you can send every one of the son of a bitches packing! Perhaps we can replace them with REAL conservatives, who don't feel inclined to capitulate to Marxists?
 
No, I am not wrong about it, and you can just keep on ignoring what I said and insisting you are right, it won't change facts. The Democrats have suggested "cuts" in the amount of automatic increase built-in to social entitlement programs, many of which need to be eliminated because they simply don't work. When you claim you're going to reduce the proposed 8% increase in funding to a 5% increase, that is simply NOT A CUT in spending. It is merely a reduction in increase. At the same time, you are also proposing trillions more in spending on new programs that aren't even in the budget yet, like Obamacare.

I'm not wrong about the sentiments of people I know who voted for Republicans. NONE of them expect or want their representatives to capitulate to the Marxists, they didn't vote for them to do that, and if they do so, will be thrown out of office for it. There is no negotiation on principles, you either have them or you don't. Raising taxes will not increase revenues, it's a stupid idea that even Obama admits will not work. It will result in LESS tax revenue and LESS economic prosperity, with FEWER jobs created. If you don't believe that, watch what happens when the massive tax increases happen as a result of going over the fiscal cliff!

As for who is held accountable, I don't care! I know that is a hard concept for you to grasp, being how your head is firmly up the ass of your political party here, but really.... as far as I'm concerned, you can send every one of the son of a bitches packing! Perhaps we can replace them with REAL conservatives, who don't feel inclined to capitulate to Marxists?

Now that the Republican Party is falling apart, Dixie pretends hes not one of them.
 
Obama has proposed $1.22 trillion in spending cuts. $800 billion represents cuts to programs, and $122 billion would come from slowing benefits on SS and other programs. Of the $800 billion, half would come from healthcare programs, $200 billion from mandatory programs like farm price supports, $100 billion from military spending, and $100 billion from discretionary domestic programs.

How ya like me now?

He starts out OVER-BUDGET by $1.6 trillion, do the maths! How is this a "CUT" in spending? Not to mention, your "$1.22 trillion" is spread out over 10 years, so that is $122 billion per year, when his deficit is still $1.6 trillion or higher per year. ALSO... you aren't including back in, the cost of implementing Obamacare, which doesn't even come into play until 2014. In total, it is estimated you have about $20 trillion in deficit spending over the next 10 years, from the programs and policies currently in place, and you think $1.22 trillion is a CUT?
 
Last edited:
Now that the Republican Party is falling apart, Dixie pretends hes not one of them.

I'm not "pretending" anything, Jughead. I've said for the past 10-15 years, I am NOT a Republican! Don't believe me? Do a search on this site for "NOT a Republican" and "Dixie" and see what you turn up!
 
Last I checked, when you divide trillions by 10, you get billions. Does your maths indicate something different, bonehead?

You are using old math, Dixie uses REPUBLICAN math, even though hes not a Republican anymore.
 
Here's the thing, you want to "HELP" the middle class? You want to bring back economic prosperity for all? CUT the top marginal rates! ENCOURAGE the "rich people" to make as much fucking profit as they can! Because, I guarantee you, when they are making money, we are ALL making money! We ALL have jobs! The more "the rich" make, the more they NEED the "non-rich" to do the things they don't want to do, like polish the yacht, wash the Lear jet, give the old lady pedicures, etc., etc., etc., and it's endless prosperity for ALL!

YES, I am ALL for "benefiting the rich" because when they benefit, so do the rest of us. The more they make, the more tax revenues they pay, and the more money we have to spend on social entitlements and all the rest. This is much better for the middle class, and especially the poor, than this mindlessly stupid WAR ON THE RICH!

You're a poor person trying to think like a rich person. A rich person does not spend money the way you think. They do not buy more things just because they have more money because they already have the money. If they wanted something they would have bought it already. That is the scam about trickle down economics.

The guy making $50,000/yr. thinks about how he would buy a better car and take a better vacation and maybe buy a summer home if he earned $100,000......The rich person isn't thinking that. They have the money to buy a better car if they wanted one. They have the money for a vacation and a summer home if they want one. The point being the extra money is not the deciding factor for the wealthy. It's well known the wealthy do not leave exorbitant tips. Why not? Because they do not spend money just because they have it. That's why.

Poor people do that. The more money they have they more they spend. Rich people do not do that. That's why they're rich.

Look at the corporations. They've stocked piled money. Why aren't they spending it? They're not spending it because there's nothing they want to buy (invest in).

This idea that the rich won't spend money or invest is a scam, plain and simple. A rich person will invest in a good deal. They like making money. If they don't invest they lose the money they have through inflation.

I don't know where you got the idea that being nice to the rich guy means he'll be nice to you unless you had a family member you used to suck up to when you were a kid and they gave you a quarter.
 
Funny as hell... you start by claiming:

[The rich] do not spend money just because they have it.

and you end up saying:

If [the rich] don't invest they lose the money they have through inflation.

It seems you are conflicted here. Do rich people spend money or not?

Let me clear you up here, since I know "rich" people, and I have considerable wealth myself. Most of them either own some type of business or they invest in other types of business. In order to remain competitive, they try to achieve a goal of at least 10% growth each year. Now maybe, the economic conditions, along with restrictions, regulations, tax burdens and costs, create a condition where they can't operate their businesses and achieve such growth, in which case, many will decide to invest instead. Either way, their wealth contributes to the overall economy, because investments are beneficial to someone who is operating a business somewhere. If you tax, restrict, regulate and impede their ability to invest and make a profit, they will pick investment opportunity that you can't touch, like municipal bonds and securities. You can't tax, restrict, penalize, regulate and impede these investments because cities and municipalities require the money to operate. So you are basically fucked, and they are doing the fucking.

Now... IF you relieve the penalties, regulations, restrictions and taxes, and allow them to operate their businesses and make 10% profits or greater, they will likely do this, because as you said, they do like to make money and they will spend money on a good deal. When this happens, jobs are created, either directly by their spending or by other supporting business that is improved because of their expansion. Even if you remove the restriction, penalties, taxes, etc. on general investments, it still generates new jobs and economic growth, because someone is using the money somewhere. The scenario that you don't want, is for them to sock their money away in some bond or security, because those investments generate virtually no economic growth or prosperity. Are you with me so far? Entrepreneurial investments and venture capital investments will always result in creating new jobs and economic growth and expansion. When they realize the profits from this, we realize increased tax revenues, as well as the new jobs, which also will be paying income taxes and creating economic prosperity through consumerism. More consumerism means more sales taxes generated. This is how you gain economic prosperity, plain and simple.

As for tax rates, restrictions and regulations on investment and whatnot, the "rich" don't really care what you do, because they don't need to earn income anymore, they can choose to invest in bonds and securities which your hands are tied on, and you can't touch. They won't make as much as they could make if you eased the restrictions and tax burdens on other investments, or corporate profits, but they don't really give two shits, they still have plenty of wealth and will continue to live the lifestyle they've grown accustomed to. In the end, the person who suffers the most, is the middle class or poor person, struggling to find a job and pay the bills. And life goes on!
 
Funny as hell... you start by claiming:

[The rich] do not spend money just because they have it.

and you end up saying:

If [the rich] don't invest they lose the money they have through inflation.

It seems you are conflicted here. Do rich people spend money or not?

LOL There is difference between investing and spending. You're trolling now, aren't you?

Let me clear you up here, since I know "rich" people, and I have considerable wealth myself. Most of them either own some type of business or they invest in other types of business. In order to remain competitive, they try to achieve a goal of at least 10% growth each year. Now maybe, the economic conditions, along with restrictions, regulations, tax burdens and costs, create a condition where they can't operate their businesses and achieve such growth, in which case, many will decide to invest instead. Either way, their wealth contributes to the overall economy, because investments are beneficial to someone who is operating a business somewhere. If you tax, restrict, regulate and impede their ability to invest and make a profit, they will pick investment opportunity that you can't touch, like municipal bonds and securities. You can't tax, restrict, penalize, regulate and impede these investments because cities and municipalities require the money to operate. So you are basically fucked, and they are doing the fucking.

Now... IF you relieve the penalties, regulations, restrictions and taxes, and allow them to operate their businesses and make 10% profits or greater, they will likely do this, because as you said, they do like to make money and they will spend money on a good deal. When this happens, jobs are created, either directly by their spending or by other supporting business that is improved because of their expansion. Even if you remove the restriction, penalties, taxes, etc. on general investments, it still generates new jobs and economic growth, because someone is using the money somewhere. The scenario that you don't want, is for them to sock their money away in some bond or security, because those investments generate virtually no economic growth or prosperity. Are you with me so far? Entrepreneurial investments and venture capital investments will always result in creating new jobs and economic growth and expansion. When they realize the profits from this, we realize increased tax revenues, as well as the new jobs, which also will be paying income taxes and creating economic prosperity through consumerism. More consumerism means more sales taxes generated. This is how you gain economic prosperity, plain and simple.

As for tax rates, restrictions and regulations on investment and whatnot, the "rich" don't really care what you do, because they don't need to earn income anymore, they can choose to invest in bonds and securities which your hands are tied on, and you can't touch. They won't make as much as they could make if you eased the restrictions and tax burdens on other investments, or corporate profits, but they don't really give two shits, they still have plenty of wealth and will continue to live the lifestyle they've grown accustomed to. In the end, the person who suffers the most, is the middle class or poor person, struggling to find a job and pay the bills. And life goes on!

As you said the securities and bonds don't pay and their money slowly evaporates. And as far as "but they don't really give two shits" you couldn't be more wrong. They do care, Dix. They're addicted, for lack of a better term. What else describes behavior where a person keeps acquiring more than they need? Wealthy people watch their money. The average gardener, the pool cleaner, the maid, the chauffeur....do you think a wealthy family is paying them some outrageous wage because they can afford to do so?

Again, I don't know where you get your impression of wealthy people. They do what is best for them. Period! And they make the best of any situation. They don't just sit back and do nothing. Oh, they may for a time while they wait for better circumstances but as soon as they know the circumstances are staying the way they are they use the money to make money because that's what rich people do. They'll rant an rave about higher taxes and make all kinds of threats but in the end they will invest and try to make money regardless of the circumstances because that's what rich people do. And the longer they wait the more money they lose and they don't like losing money.

It's almost like you worship them. It's really incredible.
 
OMFG!

You are sooooo wrong!

Dixie's rich! He told us so himself, so it's got to be true!




I told him to sell Water Works and the Electric Company and pick up the Reading Railroad but he thinks he knows everything. :(

monopoly1.jpg
 
Hey Dixie. BTW, I noticed you posted throughout the night last night. Are you working as a night watchman or is your sorry ass unemployed?
 
Back
Top