republicans have more in common with fascism thant he green party

evince said:
First steps[edit]

The Fascist government began its reign in an insecure position. Coming to power in 1922, after the March on Rome, it was a minority government until the 1923 Acerbo Law and the 1924 elections, and it took until 1925, after the assassination of Giacomo Matteotti, to establish itself securely as a dictatorship.

Economic policy in the first few years was largely classical liberal, with the Ministry of Finance controlled by the old liberal Alberto De Stefani. The government undertook a low-key laissez-faire program — the tax system was restructured (February 1925 law, 23 June 1927 decree-law, etc.), there were attempts to attract foreign investment and establish trade agreements, efforts were made to balance the budget and cut subsidies. The 10% tax on capital invested in banking and industrial sectors was repealed, while the tax on directors and administrators of anonymous companies (SA) was cut down by half. All foreign capital was exonerated of taxes, while the luxury tax was also repealed.[2] Mussolini also opposed municipalization of enterprises.[2]

The 19 April 1923 law transferred life insurance to private enterprise, repealing the 1912 law which had created a State Institute for insurances and which had envisioned to give a state monopoly ten years later.[3] Furthermore, a 19 November 1922 decree suppressed the Commission on War Profits, while the 20 August 1923 law suppressed the inheritance tax inside the family circle.[2]

There was a general emphasis on what has been called productivism — national economic growth as a means of social regeneration and wider assertion of national importance.

Up until 1925 the country enjoyed modest growth but structural weaknesses increased inflation and the currency slowly fell (1922 L90 to £1, 1925 L145 to £1). In 1925 there was a great increase in speculation and short runs against the lira. The levels of capital movement became so great the government attempted to intervene. De Stefani was sacked, his program side-tracked, and the Fascist government became more involved in the economy in step with the increased security of their power.

In 1925, the Italian state abandoned its monopoly on telephones' infrastructure, while the state production of matches was handed over to a private "Consortium of matches' productors.[3]"

Furthermore, various banking and industrial companies were financially supported by the state. One of Mussolini's first act was to fund the metallurgical trust Ansaldo to the height of 400 millions Lire. Following the deflation crisis which started in 1926, banks such as the Banco di Roma, the Banco di Napoli or the Banco di Sicilia were also assisted by the state.[4] In 1924, the Unione Radiofonica Italiana (URI) was formed by private entrepreneurs and part of the Marconi group, and granted the same year a monopoly of radio broadcasts. URI became the RAI after the war



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Italy_under_fascism#First_steps
Click to expand...

face facts you lying fucking traitors
 
Mussolini had lots in common with the current right wing in this country


FACTS are FACTS



facts have a liberal bias huh
 
The stuff she's posting does not support her assertion. Nobody in the right wing believes there should be a government monopoly phone company...

Fascism, as I informed her in the past, controlled the segments of the economy. They split up and segmented the departments that controlled each, but the companies were controlled by the government. A company making cars were told how many cars to make and at what price to sell it. While the company was still "privately owned" they were so over regulated that it became cumbersome. According to her own link as the sand fell from their grasp Italy began trying to open their fists so they could hold more of that sand. You see it as they try to diverge from a government monopoly (phone company). However, fascism is not free market nor is it leftist.

The closest thing you'll see to fascism in this country is the Affordable Care Act which took over a segment of the economy and forced private companies to provide a specific product. Even more so with the government edict that you must buy this product or be punished.
 
Damocles said:
The stuff she's posting does not support her assertion. Nobody in the right wing believes there should be a government monopoly phone company...

Fascism, as I informed her in the past, controlled the segments of the economy. They split up and segmented the departments that controlled each, but the companies were controlled by the government. A company making cars were told how many cars to make and at what price to sell it. While the company was still "privately owned" they were so over regulated that it became cumbersome. According to her own link as the sand fell from their grasp Italy began trying to open their fists so they could hold more of that sand. You see it as they try to diverge from a government monopoly (phone company). However, fascism is not free market nor is it leftist.

The closest thing you'll see to fascism in this country is the Affordable Care Act which took over a segment of the economy and forced private companies to provide a specific product.
Click to expand...

so you liked it when humans couldn't get care when hey needed it?


you are evil
 
evince said:
so you liked it when humans couldn't get care when hey needed it?


you are evil
Click to expand...

Your premise is that the only way to help people is through government.

I don't know any rational person that says people shouldn't help their fellow man. The question is how best to do it. You an others believe that it should be done by an all powerful central government. Others of us believe that these things are best handled if not at the individual level then at the lowest government level possible to increase effectiveness and accountability.

As long as you are going to operate under a faulty premise than you will be treated like the idiot that you are.
 
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-e...ck-victim-self-definition-20160103-story.html

Black people everywhere, many of our most audible voices seem to say, will always and everywhere be “the faces at the bottom of the well,” as Coates put it.
But the truth is more complicated than that. I am a black man of mixed race heritage, and while every black member of my family has encountered racism, we are also the ones in the family who hold graduate degrees, own businesses and travel abroad. My black father, born in 1937 in segregated Texas, is an exponentially more worldly man than my maternal white Protestant grandfather, whose racism always struck me more as a sad function of his provincialism or powerlessness than anything else. I don't mean to excuse the corrosive effects of his views; I simply wish to note that when I compare these two men, I do not recognize my father as the victim.
As for me, I was raised in a household in which I took as a birthright the kind of first-rate college education the majority of kids are denied. Today, I live in Paris, where I've found the freedom to exist outside the American racial binary. I have by no means achieved great wealth or status, but I've supported myself for almost a decade by reading and writing, which in itself constitutes an incredible luxury.
Of course, my personal life is just that — personal and highly particular. But is the black experience in America anything but the sum of individual lives?

FACTS!
 
Superfreak said:
It states: 'You are a moron from Ohio, who went to USC... therefore you are not intelligent enough to comprehend the written word'

Let me know how you want to send the $5k to me.
Click to expand...

You have to tell him the town you live in so he can send it to general delivery, seeing as though you don't have a home or a pot to piss in.
 
Damocles said:
Look at her trying to play emotive nonsense now. No information, no facts just emotive nonsense.
Click to expand...

look at you pretending not wanting people to die without care that could save them emotive nonsense


what the fuck happened to your soul damo
 
No FACTS?


damo?


are you going to fucking claim no lives were saved by ACAs coverage?


that is an idiots fucking lie and you KNOW IT
 
evince said:
First steps[edit]

The Fascist government began its reign in an insecure position. Coming to power in 1922, after the March on Rome, it was a minority government until the 1923 Acerbo Law and the 1924 elections, and it took until 1925, after the assassination of Giacomo Matteotti, to establish itself securely as a dictatorship.

Economic policy in the first few years was largely classical liberal, with the Ministry of Finance controlled by the old liberal Alberto De Stefani. The government undertook a low-key laissez-faire program — the tax system was restructured (February 1925 law, 23 June 1927 decree-law, etc.), there were attempts to attract foreign investment and establish trade agreements, efforts were made to balance the budget and cut subsidies. The 10% tax on capital invested in banking and industrial sectors was repealed, while the tax on directors and administrators of anonymous companies (SA) was cut down by half. All foreign capital was exonerated of taxes, while the luxury tax was also repealed.[2] Mussolini also opposed municipalization of enterprises.[2]

The 19 April 1923 law transferred life insurance to private enterprise, repealing the 1912 law which had created a State Institute for insurances and which had envisioned to give a state monopoly ten years later.[3] Furthermore, a 19 November 1922 decree suppressed the Commission on War Profits, while the 20 August 1923 law suppressed the inheritance tax inside the family circle.[2]

There was a general emphasis on what has been called productivism — national economic growth as a means of social regeneration and wider assertion of national importance.

Up until 1925 the country enjoyed modest growth but structural weaknesses increased inflation and the currency slowly fell (1922 L90 to £1, 1925 L145 to £1). In 1925 there was a great increase in speculation and short runs against the lira. The levels of capital movement became so great the government attempted to intervene. De Stefani was sacked, his program side-tracked, and the Fascist government became more involved in the economy in step with the increased security of their power.

In 1925, the Italian state abandoned its monopoly on telephones' infrastructure, while the state production of matches was handed over to a private "Consortium of matches' productors.[3]"

Furthermore, various banking and industrial companies were financially supported by the state. One of Mussolini's first act was to fund the metallurgical trust Ansaldo to the height of 400 millions Lire. Following the deflation crisis which started in 1926, banks such as the Banco di Roma, the Banco di Napoli or the Banco di Sicilia were also assisted by the state.[4] In 1924, the Unione Radiofonica Italiana (URI) was formed by private entrepreneurs and part of the Marconi group, and granted the same year a monopoly of radio broadcasts. URI became the RAI after the war



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Italy_under_fascism#First_steps
Click to expand...

want to explain why you fucks love Bennie the moose so fucking much?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top