Nope. Just you. What the hell does turtles have to do with the topic?
Republicans force women to wait until they are on the verge of death
- Thread starter Walt
- Start date
Nope. Just you. What the hell does turtles have to do with the topic?
That means you're for free for all hunting.
Yeah, which means Republicans are fucked.
Another retarded post.
The law does not apply to turtles themselves. Apparently, even turtles have the right of choice.
The whole point is that the state legislatures are forcing malpractice like this, all for fetuses that will never be viable. Women's lives are being risked as they wait until it becomes an emergency, but no possible life is being saved.
Into the Night
Verified User
No, they aren't. You are just making shit up again.
Ycallaf Fallacy. Ballet fallacy. Gnome fallacy. Hobbit fallacy.
Well, Walter, just look at all the children's lives that have been saved, every week.
As you well know, there never was an enumerated right to abortion in the Constitution.
All those abortion murders were committed using a false interpretation by the Roe decision.
Poor Walter.
Can you think of any good reason to force a woman to carry a nonviable fetus? It will never end in a birth, but is full of dangers along the way.
Children are by definition already born, so no children's lives have been saved. Besides, most of the tough cases involve nonviable fetuses, so they will never be children.
If saving fetuses is important, you would want to invest heavily in prenatal care. Millions of fetuses die every year for lack of prenatal care.
Well, no, Walter.
A human life is taken with abortion.
It’s murder to take that human life.
You know this and I know this.
What is the goal of crushing an unborn’s skull, Walter?
Late term abortions are almost always done on nonviable fetuses. In fact, the majority of the time, the fetus is completely dead.
Let's move on to a hypothetical. Picture you and me in a building, which unfortunately collapses. If I die, with my corpse on top of your still live body, I want everything to be about saving your life. Destroy my corpse anyway that will save your life.
Likewise, with a dead fetus stuck in a woman's birthing canal, I have no problem with crushing a corpses skull to save a living woman. It is better than breaking her pelvis, and trying to sow together a dozen major arteries before she bleeds to death.
The jokers on the Supreme court are relics of Medevil times. The GOP has taken us backwards. We are worse off as a nation because of trump and his cowardly followers.
They definitely did use medieval legal arguments to overturn Roe v. Wade. If it was such a strong case, why did they need such obscure precedence?
Because that's where their moral code is derived. From the time when there were surfs and an entire lower class they can command. The demons want a real "Handmaids' Tale" society.
The unborn baby was alive before it was murdered, Walter.
The S.C ruled that there was never a Constitutional enumeration of abortion rights, Walter.
It's left to the states...Democracy in action, Walter.
An abortion is ending a pregnancy. A fetus can be dead, and the pregnancy will continue. Or the fetus can be unviable, and the pregnancy will continue. Almost always when talking about late term abortions (which you brought up) the fetus is at least unviable, and more often than not, actually dead. Which is to say that it cannot be murder.
The worst you could make it is desecrating a corpse. There are religions that would rather let a person die than desecrate a corpse, but I do not believe in that. Desecrate the corpse of a fetus all you want if it saves a woman's life.