Removal unlikely by traitors and cowards-analysis included

There has been ZERO evidence of treason, high crimes or misdemeanors. Trump will not get convicted in the Senate and the economy continues booming at a great pace.

There is an abundance of evidence that Trump abused the power of his office...and obstructed the congress.

I do agree, however, that he will not get convicted. The spineless Trump defenders in the Senate will not vote to convict him although no president before him is so guilty as he.
 
It's going to be awesome to see 44 Senators declare that TRUMP MUST BE REMOVED FOR BEING A CRIMINAL
after the House Impeaches him. Then we kill you in the election. Sweet!

you will see a bipartisan effort to keep him in office.

not a single Republican is going to vote for this, meanwhile several democrats will vote with republicans
 
I think the Democrats in the House knew the spineless Senate would never convict Trump no matter how compelling the evidence.

The point was to impeach him...to put the world on notice that at least they had the guts to do what was right.

The spineless senators who vote to acquit him will have to live with that vote on their conscience.

This clown act is finally winding down with two weak articles abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The first one is open to interpretation as to what was meant. And the 2nd one is ambiguous at best. I'm not sure the House will impeach if it does it will be straight party line. It doesn.t have a prayer in the Senate. And with the clowns you have running I doubt any of them can beat Trump. But we'll see.
 
There is nothing smart or brave about impeaching a President simply because you lost an election and don't like him. :rolleyes:

Listen, TD...your side has been shouting for months now that a vote for impeachment is the death knell for the Democratic Party.

They are doing it.

I personally do not see it as a "death knell"...but I see the move as potentially a politically damaging one.

So in my opinion, they are being brave. A hell of a lot more brave than the cowards continuing to defend Trump.
 
Listen, TD...your side has been shouting for months now that a vote for impeachment is the death knell for the Democratic Party.

They are doing it.

I personally do not see it as a "death knell"...but I see the move as potentially a politically damaging one.

So in my opinion, they are being brave. A hell of a lot more brave than the cowards continuing to defend Trump.

It's a case of "we must do this" consequences be damned, to show the world somebody here cares that we are forced to live in an autocracy/monarchy with a criminal
incompetent gameshow host lying shitstain for a ruler, and there is at least some counterbalance to the forces of fascism and sellout cowardliness of the Republicans.

I personally think it is a winner for Dems. They did not push a hoax. Everyone knows this shit is real and that Trump was caught red handed.
They would not have stood for a Dem president brazenly cheating and doubling down on it, then tripling down. We are NOT. Stand up against
tyranny people. Get some fucking guts. Turn off Fox lie channel and turn your brain on. Isn't it sad how quickly, easily and uniformly supposed
patriotic citizens flip a switch, commit treason, decline to listen to ALL OUR intelligence services and adopt a lie from the Kremlin solely because it suits
their immediate political interests? I had no idea ruining a country through media manipulation could be done so easily. Having a dumb population
certainly makes it easier for them.

Where I live it's suburbs, high wealth, medium density all college educated. NOBODY believes Trump is not a criminal. 99% wouldn't stop their Telsa
if he was in the roadway. No tire tracks. Amazing how different it is elsewhere.
 
Trump isn't guilty of anything. Nor will he be. :rolleyes:


Illiterate stupid fuck.

Try to educate yourself on the concepts of guilt, exoneration or any of the other canned phrases you RW fucktards lazily toss around because you heard a Hannity or Limbaugh shit them out.

Fucking moron.
 
Illiterate stupid fuck.

Try to educate yourself on the concepts of guilt, exoneration or any of the other canned phrases you RW fucktards lazily toss around because you heard a Hannity or Limbaugh shit them out.

Fucking moron.

Why even quote these people? You must know what you are getting in return. I don't see a damn thing any imbecile writes UNLESS you or other quote them.
 
Forced to defend. That's a mouthful. We all have a choice. He chooses "to defend....."

I was trying to show respect.

I can understand someone being forced to defend Trump. Anyone "choosing" to defend him is pissing on the Republic.
 
Wrong; they are underwhelming in the extreme sense and will have gotten the Democratic Party of the Jackass nothing. But hey, I do hope the Party of the Jackass continues their charade, burning down their house and dividing the American people. It's a winning campaign ad for Trump.



They would be laughed out of a court of law. :rolleyes:

Okay...you truly are blind.

So...go where you blindness leads you.
 
This clown act is finally winding down with two weak articles abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The first one is open to interpretation as to what was meant. And the 2nd one is ambiguous at best. I'm not sure the House will impeach if it does it will be straight party line. It doesn.t have a prayer in the Senate. And with the clowns you have running I doubt any of them can beat Trump. But we'll see.

I'm a registered Independent.

The "obstruction of Congress" charge is so firm, a defense lawyer would probably suggest a guilty plea.

But you are correct. The spineless cowards in the Senate will NOT vote to remove him...even though that is the most patriotic thing a senator could do.
 
There is an abundance of evidence that Trump abused the power of his office...and obstructed the congress.

There is a complete lack of evidence that he abused his office. Go ahead, list out what he did to abuse his office genius.

Obstructed Congress? :rofl2: That is the lamest charge. Yeah, he refused to KowTow to a strictly partisan effort to impugn his Presidency. The Constitution: READ it. ;)

Turley: .....the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president.

I am concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence and an abundance of anger. ....this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president. That does not bode well for future presidents who are working in a country often sharply and, at times, bitterly divided.



I do agree, however, that he will not get convicted. The spineless Trump defenders in the Senate will not vote to convict him although no president before him is so guilty as he.

Were they spineless defenders of Bill Clinton when they refused to vote for impeachment?

Is Nadler a liar, a hypocrite or both when he said this:

Jerry Nadler | We're Lowering the Standard of Impeachment
 
All of you guys that are dropping Putin’s name...
Y’all do realize that the investigation into Trump/Russia collision came back negative right? Y’all are just repeating a lie at this point.

Sure Russia made some social media channels and spread some memes, but to say “Putin have Trump the electoral college”....c’mon now!! That’s just silly talk.
 
Back
Top