Remigration

Jake Starkey

Verified User
Remigration is a term and possibility we need to discuss.

According AI research, remigration RIGHT NOW is not possible based on identity or ethnic origin per Constitution and law. This is explained below.

However, the MAGA alt right movement have created a class of political criminals who no longer possess American values and (watch Trump) are engaged in a political conspiracy to destabilize the federal and state governments. Their desire is to create a new country for and by MAGA and exploit the rest of America for their gain.

We need to figure out to remigrate MAGAts. The sooner the better.

gration” as a policy

In U.S. law, there is no statute, regulation, or constitutional mechanism that permits a government to:
  • remove citizens based on ancestry, ethnicity, religion, or national origin
  • expel lawful permanent residents without an individualized legal cause
  • force people to “return” to a country they or their families came from
Any such action would violate:
  • the 14th Amendment (equal protection, due process)
  • the 5th Amendment (due process)
  • the Civil Rights Act
  • multiple Supreme Court precedents on citizenship and discrimination
So as a government policy, “remigration” is not legally possible.
✅
There are existing, lawful processes that involve people leaving the country, but they are completely different from the political term “remigration”:

Anyone can choose to move to another country on their own.This is simply personal freedom of movement.

This applies only to:
  • non‑citizens
  • who violate specific immigration laws
  • after due process in immigration court
It cannot be applied to:
  • U.S. citizens
  • lawful residents without cause
  • groups defined by ethnicity, religion, or origin
Some countries offer voluntary financial incentives for immigrants who choose to return to their country of origin.These programs are optional, not coercive.

The word is used in political rhetoric, especially in Europe, to imply mass population removal.But legally:
  • It has no definition
  • It has no statutory basis
  • It cannot override constitutional protections
So the legal system treats it the same way it would treat any proposal that violates equal protection or due process — it’s simply not permissible.

If “remigration” means forced removal of citizens or lawful residents based on identity or origin, then no — it is not legally possible.

If it means voluntary emigration or lawful deportation of individuals who violate immigration law, then yes — those processes already exist, but they are not “remigration.”

www.bing.com/search?qs=MT&pq=remigration&sk=CSYN1&sc=14-11&pglt=425&q=remigration+definition&cvid=60036b59f1754cf0927086c3ae4cc8a2&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgcIABAAGPkHMgcIABAAGPkHMgYIARBFGDkyBggCEAAYQDIGCAMQABhAMgYIBBAAGEAyBggFEAAYQDIGCAYQABhAMgYIBxAAGEAyBggIEAAYQNIBCDQyMjNqMGoxqAIIsAIB
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/remigration
 
Back
Top