Remember when DEMOCRATS thought challenging election results was good?

Look here, "copy and paste" bailing on his own thread, deflecting with the usual "whataboutism," not surprising, it was inane from the jump, point being, Democrat objections in the prior elections are pale to almost nonexistent in comparison to the GOP's efforts in this election

Lie. Doublespeak. There is no such thing as 'whataboutism'. There is no deflection here. There is no pivot fallacy here. Fallacy fallacy. You are arguing both sides of a paradox. Irrational.
 
Scumbag redneck trash white nationalists do have a cause, just not a just cause. You fucking lost yuge, ("by a landslide"-Trump) so
dry your tears already and try again in four years, stupid trash. :palm:
 
So you are saying there was no fraud? Asking for a friend.

I am not saying anything, sock puppet. Every state, 60 courts including SCOTUS, the atty general, the secretaries of states of all the states,
and CISA all say this election was secure and fraud free. Only butt hurt crybaby delusional Trumptards think otherwise,
and based on no evidence that can be presented in any manner persuasive to any court.

Good to meet you fake n00b
 
What is sad that the swamp never liked Trump... even the judges. The thing is all these swamp rats going against the people will regret what they did.

Pot kettle black. Of course nobody sane liked Trump. Sane people knew he was an incompetent criminal lying scumbag.
And he proved everyone sane correct, every fucking day. Now he's gone, and he should have never thought himself capable
of the job. We will clean up your messes again, as Barack Obama did after Bush the lesser fucked America the last time.

You have no just cause. Nothing was stolen. You have ZERO proof otherwise and the win was by 8 million popular votes and 74 electoral college votes
certified by all the states.
 
Sound familiar?


Far-left Mother Jones: “Recounting the Election: Was Ohio stolen?” https://www.motherjones.com/media/2005/11/recounting-ohio/

Fake News CNN: "DEMOCRATS challenge Ohio electoral votes" https://edition.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/06/electoral.vote.1718/

Failing New York Times:“Glitch Found in Ohio Counting” ww.nytimes.com/2004/11/06/politics/campaign/glitch-found-in-ohio-counting.html

Newsweak: "Trump's Electoral College Victory Challenged by DEMOCRATS" https://www.newsweek.com/donald-tru...ocrats-electoral-college-election-2016-539801

The Washington Post: "Was the 2016 U.S. election democratic? Here are 7 serious shortfalls." https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ction-democratic-we-see-7-serious-shortfalls/

They even included some way-out voting machine conspiracy theories.

National Election Defense Coalition: “PARTISAN TECHNOLOGY FIRM IS IMPLICATED IN JOHN KERRY’S IMPLAUSIBLE LOSS IN OHIO 2004 https://www.electiondefense.org/how-to-part-ten

NBC News: “Machine Glitch Gave Bush Extra Ohio Votes” https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6418513


The last three times a Republican was elected president — Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in both 2000 and 2004 — DEMOCRATS in the House have brought objections to the electoral votes in states the GOP candidate won.

If it weren't for double standards, would DEMOCRATS have any standards at all?


YOU LOST ... AND THAT’S NOT GOING TO CHANGE
 
YOU LOST ... AND THAT’S NOT GOING TO CHANGE

This thread is about DEMOCRATS pretending that contesting election results is dangerous and ridiculous while ignoring the their own history of doing the same thing.

Have another drink.
 
This thread is about DEMOCRATS pretending that contesting election results is dangerous and ridiculous while ignoring the their own history of doing the same thing.

Have another drink.

YOU LOST ... AND THAT’S NOT GOING TO CHANGE
 
Lie. Doublespeak. There is no such thing as 'whataboutism'. There is no deflection here. There is no pivot fallacy here. Fallacy fallacy. You are arguing both sides of a paradox. Irrational.

“birdman” cracks anyone up, we got “doublespeak,” “pivot fallacy,” “fallacy fallacy,” and “paradox” all within thirty one words, and that is counting prepositions and articles. Got to wonder if he even understand what is a fallacy beyond his list off fallacies he pulled off Google
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies)

Well, your post is a double secret fallacy fallacy fallacy
 
This thread is about DEMOCRATS pretending that contesting election results is dangerous and ridiculous while ignoring the their own history of doing the same thing.

Have another drink.

Which has been shown to “copy and paste” how over several elections combined is minuscular in comparison to what the GOP is doing now, apples and oranges, but the actual facts never stopped “copy and paste”
 
Back
Top