Remember those 17 intelligence agencies?

The sands of Russian collusion are eroding before our very eyes. Just as I predicted. How embarrassing for JPP libtards. They were played


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
You can call it lying but it's more complicated than that. Clapper [or one of them] hand-picked the agents that would contribute to the intelligence assessment. You do that if you want to get a specific conclusion; or in this instance, to support a political narrative: specifically, that Russia meddled in the election.

The media dutifully picked it up from there, and began to parrot the propaganda that the IC unanimously backed the Russian influence assessment, even though nobody in the government did a freaking forensic analysis on the freaking DNC server.

It's bullshit in Neon lights. I put more trust in Assange and he says they were leaks and not hacks. I see no reason to disbelieve him.

Assange has never willingly published falsified materials. The IC says Assange was a dupe.
Why would i willingly believe an agency that "wittingly" lies to Congress?

The CIA HACKED the Senate computers when the Senate was doing oversight on Bush interrogation techniques!
they ADMITTED IT!

John Brennan admits CIA improperly hacked into Senate computers
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/31/cia-admits-improperly-hacking-senate-computers-sea/
 
damn straight.
the entire leadership has to go, and new leadership has to be sworn not to play Deep State political games with unmasking/leaking/ ( at minimum)

Politicizing any federal agency is a bigger threat to democracy than Russia ever was. And it absolutely goes on.

It will take someone like Trump to clean it out---if they don't take him out first.
 
I don't think the MSM lied about this so much as shown their lack of journalistic integrity by not verifying what they were being told by Clinton's campaign. But then again, like so many other stories fed to MSM, they are essentially lying because any decent journalist would immediately question 17 out of 17, if not just to verify.
 
I asked you a direct yes or no question. Drop your "if" bullshit. Four agencies or seventeen. You're saying there was no Russian hack. Correct?

i think multiple countries on a daily basis TRY to infiltrate us.

China does it, israel does it, many other nations do it.

I also know the CIA admitted to being able to fake the "fingerprints" of foreign nations.

I know the CIA was involved in MK ultra, and secretly tested drugs for mind control reasons on us citizens (including the mentally ill, prisoners, and prostitutes) for 20 years all the way up to the 1970s.

And I know they have routinely lied in the past, have supported false flag attacks, including trying to incite domestic terrorism and violence on u.s. citizens to provoke a war with cuba (operation northwoods) have lied to the american people about their domestic spying, and that many in the deep state have a profound interest in reigniting the cold war. But hey, that was a lonnng time ago, they are better now, right?

I also know that there is zero proof, zero evidence, objectively, that russia was wikileaks source, which ultimately all this is about.... i.e. leaking the truth of hillary clintons corruption and allowing americans to make a more informed judgement on who they were electing for office.

I can't speak to whether or not there were actual attempts, but there is zero evidence any of it mattered in this election, that it had any material effect, or that it amounted to anything at all, or that it was anything unique or special.

The DNC wont even let the FBI look at their own server. If I felt a foreign nation hacked my shit, I would want the FBI to be able to do their due diligence. Instead they got a 3rd party funded by themselves to state what they wanted.

There is a leaked email that podesta immediately after the election night loss wanted to begin spinning the narrative of "muh russians"

No, the russians did not "hack our election"
 
i think multiple countries on a daily basis TRY to infiltrate us.

China does it, israel does it, many other nations do it.

I also know the CIA admitted to being able to fake the "fingerprints" of foreign nations.

I know the CIA was involved in MK ultra, and secretly tested drugs for mind control reasons on us citizens (including the mentally ill, prisoners, and prostitutes) for 20 years all the way up to the 1970s.

And I know they have routinely lied in the past, have supported false flag attacks, including trying to incite domestic terrorism and violence on u.s. citizens to provoke a war with cuba (operation northwoods) have lied to the american people about their domestic spying, and that many in the deep state have a profound interest in reigniting the cold war. But hey, that was a lonnng time ago, they are better now, right?

I also know that there is zero proof, zero evidence, objectively, that russia was wikileaks source, which ultimately all this is about.... i.e. leaking the truth of hillary clintons corruption and allowing americans to make a more informed judgement on who they were electing for office.

I can't speak to whether or not there were actual attempts, but there is zero evidence any of it mattered in this election, that it had any material effect, or that it amounted to anything at all, or that it was anything unique or special.

The DNC wont even let the FBI look at their own server. If I felt a foreign nation hacked my shit, I would want the FBI to be able to do their due diligence. Instead they got a 3rd party funded by themselves to state what they wanted.

There is a leaked email that podesta immediately after the election night loss wanted to begin spinning the narrative of "muh russians"

No, the russians did not "hack our election"
:hand:
 
i think multiple countries on a daily basis TRY to infiltrate us.

China does it, israel does it, many other nations do it.

I also know the CIA admitted to being able to fake the "fingerprints" of foreign nations.

I know the CIA was involved in MK ultra, and secretly tested drugs for mind control reasons on us citizens (including the mentally ill, prisoners, and prostitutes) for 20 years all the way up to the 1970s.

And I know they have routinely lied in the past, have supported false flag attacks, including trying to incite domestic terrorism and violence on u.s. citizens to provoke a war with cuba (operation northwoods) have lied to the american people about their domestic spying, and that many in the deep state have a profound interest in reigniting the cold war. But hey, that was a lonnng time ago, they are better now, right?

I also know that there is zero proof, zero evidence, objectively, that russia was wikileaks source, which ultimately all this is about.... i.e. leaking the truth of hillary clintons corruption and allowing americans to make a more informed judgement on who they were electing for office.

I can't speak to whether or not there were actual attempts, but there is zero evidence any of it mattered in this election, that it had any material effect, or that it amounted to anything at all, or that it was anything unique or special.

No, the russians did not "hack our election"

Damn! What a convoluted piece of diversional bullshit. Textbook.

Of course, you can't speak to anything. Why is that, moron? Because you don't have a fucking clue.

I will remember your absolute statement that none of the Trump people were influenced by the Russians.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/25/...ials-on-russia-frustrate-even-his-allies.html

Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.


Does this mean the new york times, washington post, and pretty much every left leaning outlet and politician was lying when they said 17 intelligence organizations agreed Russia was the source of the hacking attacks?

The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency.


and they're, like, the campus cops of National Security.........right?
 
Damn! What a convoluted piece of diversional bullshit. Textbook.

Of course, you can't speak to anything. Why is that, moron? Because you don't have a fucking clue.

I will remember your absolute statement that none of the Trump people were influenced by the Russians.
define "influenced"
 
Back
Top