FTFYyou're still all dumb in the head!
My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry
when the statements I make are corroborated by reliable outside sources.
Last edited by a moderator:
Religious affiliation of American scientists
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry
when the statements I make are corroborated by reliable outside sources.My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry
It's kinda funny that you think when you debate against that particular poster that you are either making a point or scoring some victory.
It's kinda funny that posters of the quality of Freddy the Fig bottom, Into the Night, and You collectively make common cause to attempt to claim the statements and insights I make about science and philosophy are wrong.
LOL. You're funny. YOU are never wrong. IF you were wrong then all the people you name-check ad nauseam like some sort of Rainman were all wrong and we know that they can never be wrong because you are name checking them.
You are wrong in some cases, you know. You just have the thinnest skin of any subliterate I've met in a while.
I've never said or claimed I am 100 percent correct about everything.
I try to keep my mouth shut on topics I know nothing about, which must give a lurker like you the impression I am correct a very high percentage of the time.
The fact that you made common cause with two low quality MAGA posters like Freddy Figbottom and Into the Night is the most curious thing about this thread.
Of course not! Because you don't seem to have your own understanding of anything. Which is why you always name-check.
That's your response ANY time someone disagrees with you: "Noted famous atheist Bart Ehrman agrees with me!"
Not very successfully.
LOL. "common cause".
That's a huge indicator of your major flaw: you are too dedicated to argumentum ad hominem. You can't address a person's point, you have to take digs at them or lie about their posts or misrepresent them.
And you somehow come out of that thinking you are smarter than everyone else. LOL
When you and your MAGA buddies keep claiming my statements are wrong, it behooves me to cite reputable independent sources to corroborate and confirm my statements are correct.
I wouldn't have to do that if you and your MAGA boyfriends didn't keep hollering that I am wrong -->
My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
yes. science and philosophical rantings are often mixed.My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry
that doesn't make it all science.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
yes.
you are wrong.
they are not the same.
mixing science with philosophical rantings does not make it all science.
"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical and physical framework for understanding quantum mechanics, emphasizing that a quantum particle exists in all possible states (superposition) until it is measured, at which point its state "collapses" into a single, definitive outcome. It challenges philosophical realism by suggesting that properties of quantum objects are not determinate until they are observed "
-Google AI
The Copenhagen Interpretation and Schrodingers Cat are universally understood to be part and parcel of the scientific endeavor, even though they are philosophical interpretations and thought experiments respectively.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
you're just mixing things together.
normalized form is best.
1 st stupid form is your bag.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
argument ad populum, motherum fuckerum.FTFY
My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
shrodinger cat is basic.
yes something either is or isn't.
and if you don't know, it's 50/50.
every street hustler knows this.
god dammit, blow more smoke up your asses, white people.
Trumpet
Verified User
Psychotic Freddy.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
yes, I committed hate speech against a theoretical science cat.
then I raped it.
then I raped it.
I challenge you to walk into any university physics department and harangue a physics professor that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics has nothing to do with science and does not belong in the scientific endeavor.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
it's basic math is all.
something either is or isn't.
and if you don't know, a good guess is "50/50" chance".
are you smarter than a fifith grader?
its not even philosophy either.
it's puffery.