Originally Posted by apple0154
You still don't understand. I'll give it one more try. (okay)
Sperm and egg are alive. (single-cell living organisms) They join. (and a unique multi-cell living organism is created) Rather than creating a unique organism (if they joined, they created a living multi-cell organism) something goes wrong (if something 'goes wrong' they never become living organisms of any kind, and are irrelevant in this discussion.) and the resulting "product" (there is no product, they never joined.) starts to deteriorate/die. (it can't DIE unless it is LIVING first!) There was no unique organism formed. (yes, if they joined and began living as a multi-cell organism, there WAS! --and you just admitted there was!) What formed was faulty. (again, if it the cells never joined and began the process, it is academic.)
If a unique organism had formed (if sperm and egg cells joined, it DID form.) it would have carried on the processes of life but it didn't. (It did, by your own admission, and then it died.) Considering half of all such "products" spontaneously (doesn't matter if 100% abort) abort (can't abort a process unless it's in the process) it's ludicrous to conclude the joining of sperm and egg, the fertilization of the cell, always results in an organism. (no, it's scientifically and biological accurate to conclude this, because that is exactly what happens when a single sperm cell and egg cell merge and become a multi-cell living organism, and you've presented no evidence of any kind to the contrary.)
With what part of that are you having difficulty understanding?
ALL OF IT, BECAUSE YOU CONTINUE TO CONTRADICT YOUR OWN ARGUMENT!