Religion on the Left and Right

ZappasGuitar said:
Correct, the child is receiving oxygen in the womb, but the child doesn't receive the "breath of life" from God until his/her nostrils breathe in His Breath during birth.
Click to expand...

You're confusing the creation of man with a child in the womb. Adam wasn't in the womb. You can't twist scripture to fit your agenda. Sorry about that.
 
Alias said:
You're confusing the creation of man with a child in the womb. Adam wasn't in the womb. You can't twist scripture to fit your agenda. Sorry about that.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to claim God breathed life into Adam but that He doesn't breath life individually into each and every child of His?

You've got your opinion and are entitled to it, but you've got no more proof to back it than you have proof that my opinion is false.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Are you trying to claim God breathed life into Adam but that He doesn't breath life individually into each and every child of His?

You've got your opinion and are entitled to it, but you've got no more proof to back it than you have proof that my opinion is false.
Click to expand...

You are confusing the CREATION with the birth of a person. The child in the womb is receiving oxygen from the mother. Anyway, when God breathed the breath of life into the man, it wasn't ogygen. It was the Spirit of God.
 
Alias said:
I've never heard of anyone being born and then re-entering the womb later to be born again. Have you?
Click to expand...

It would have been nice if you'd defined those ridiculously narrow parameters BEFORE you tossed out your impossibly vague question about "chances at life"...
 
Alias said:
You are confusing the CREATION with the birth of a person. The child in the womb is receiving oxygen from the mother. Anyway, when God breathed the breath of life into the man, it wasn't ogygen. It was the Spirit of God.
Click to expand...

PROVE it.

PROVE I am confusing one for the other.

Your opinion is yours, but you've got zero proof...you don't know one iota more than I do with regards to how God works
 
ZappasGuitar said:
It would have been nice if you'd defined those ridiculously narrow parameters BEFORE you tossed out your impossibly vague question about "chances at life"...
Click to expand...

Sorry. I assumed you had a functioning brain and a little common sense. I'll try to not make that mistake again.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Words...you memorized some words that give you comfort.

Too bad they don't prove your opinion either.
Click to expand...

The truth gives me comfort. No one needs to prove anything to you. You're just a little silent fart in the windstorm of truth....and you know what they say.......... silent farts are the stinkiest.
 
Alias said:
Sorry. I assumed you had a functioning brain and a little common sense. I'll try to not make that mistake again.
Click to expand...

Are you certain there's no such thing as reincarnation?

You know...reincarnation...as in, "ANOTHER chance at life"?

Simply provide some proof to the contrary and I'll take your word that we only get "one chance at life".
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Are you certain there's no such thing as reincarnation?

You know...reincarnation...as in, "ANOTHER chance at life"?

Simply provide some proof to the contrary and I'll take your word that we only get "one chance at life".
Click to expand...

YOU are the one who brought reincarnation into the debate. YOU are the one who needs to prove your point.

I bet you're not allowed to use a gun, are you!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
What proof?

You've lambasted and harangued and badgered and belittled, but you've supplied NOTHING in the way of "proof" other than your own opinion.

As to your need to resort to the ad hominem, while it may be that questions of personal conduct, character, motives, and intelligence may arise, if one is going to question another's personal conduct, etc...then he should be able to do so without the use of demeaning, derogatory and belittling rhetoric.

The inablilty to do so calls into question one's ability to express themselves intelligently.
Click to expand...

Do you seriously demand that I need proof debating a nitwit of the "Flat Earth Society"....
I need no proof....Appel the Pinhead is the one that must prove his ridiculous logic....
The logic that claims the mentally handicapped are less than human.....
The logic that claims lack of reproductive ability makes you not a organism....
The logic that claims taking a breath transforms a fetus from dead to alive or nothing to human being....
Screw you clown...
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Are you certain there's no such thing as reincarnation?

You know...reincarnation...as in, "ANOTHER chance at life"?

Simply provide some proof to the contrary and I'll take your word that we only get "one chance at life".
Click to expand...


Are you and Apple having a stupid contest.....?.....wait for onecell, he might want to enter.
 
bravo said:
,..

You're claiming anti-abortionist arguments/logic saying this stuff....Is your reading comprehension that lacking ?

So, not only are you claiming mules aren't organisms because they are sterile and unable to reproduce...you're also saying

Sarah Palin's youngest child, along with thousands of other babies that lack a chromosome, are not humans in your world....thats utterly amazing.....

Thats your understanding of the articles in the links.....for real ?

Apple my friend, you are, by far, the most ignorant sob I've ever have the pleasure of watching make a fucking fool of himself .....ever.....

Your convoluted logic and lack of common sense reasoning is just astonishing for a adult that can still feed himself and wipe his own ass...
Click to expand...

The only convoluted logic is to claim a fertilized cell is a human being when 50% spontaneously abort. Besides not knowing if those cells have the required components to ultimately develop into a human being the anti-abortionist's tacit acceptance of half the number of human beings dying shortly after coming into existence shows the disregard they have for human life.

Let me dumb this down for you. To claim fertilized cells are human beings and then accept that 1/2 of them die within hours/days of coming into existence debases what it means to be a human being. There is nothing that could possibly more cheapen what it means to be a human being.
 
apple0154 said:
The only convoluted logic is to claim a fertilized cell is a human being when 50% spontaneously abort. Besides not knowing if those cells have the required components to ultimately develop into a human being the anti-abortionist's tacit acceptance of half the number of human beings dying shortly after coming into existence shows the disregard they have for human life.

Let me dumb this down for you. To claim fertilized cells are human beings and then accept that 1/2 of them die within hours/days of coming into existence debases what it means to be a human being. There is nothing that could possibly more cheapen what it means to be a human being.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if 100% of them "abort" if they are "aborting" the process of LIFE they WERE ALIVE! Doesn't matter what happens to them after that. You keep making the same bonehead argument that since something died it was never alive to begin with, and that is beyond retarded.
 
apple0154 said:
The only convoluted logic is to claim a fertilized cell is a human being when 50% spontaneously abort. Besides not knowing if those cells have the required components to ultimately develop into a human being the anti-abortionist's tacit acceptance of half the number of human beings dying shortly after coming into existence shows the disregard they have for human life.

Let me dumb this down for you. To claim fertilized cells are human beings and then accept that 1/2 of them die within hours/days of coming into existence debases what it means to be a human being. There is nothing that could possibly more cheapen what it means to be a human being.
Click to expand...

The egg is a human egg and the sperm is a human sperm. If you don't believe that, then tell me which species they belong to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top