Release the tape!!!

Dutch Uncle said:
It's a bullshit answer, just like his promises to release the tapes.

He continues to attack female reporters and call them names. Worse if they are black. He's very unwell but still a weak, spineless liar just like all of his MAGAt cracker retards.

www.newsweek.com

Donald Trump calls female reporter "obnoxious" for asking question

In recent weeks, President Trump has drawn attention after slinging insults at several female journalists.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdh1dYvvrsk


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvtLf0N8NrI
Click to expand...
crying-icegif-13.gif


Cry coward, cry...
 
Jarod said:
I lost the epstein bet, and was glad of it.

We might see the video, when it will distract from something worse than what it shows, but I kinda doubt it.

If it helped TACO's argument, it would be on a loop at foxnews.com. RIght now the issue is distracting from the made up affordability issue, and the upcoming deadline on the epstein file release.
Click to expand...
You like being a loser?

You never served a day in your life and you claim to be an expert on command decisions made by those who do serve.

The drugs and drug gangs that poured into this country during the vegetable’s four years don’t resonate with you, do they?

The necessary life and death decisions made by those who do serve stay with them for the rest of their lives while you sit and nit-pick those decisions, in comfort, made possible, by our heroes.

You sit in comfort and security provided by those heroes and defend the very barbarians that they protect you from.

Sin verguenza indeed.
 
QP! said:
Agreed.

And this does open the door to ALL future such disabled military personnel, American or other, being killed.

This new standard Magats are pushing is completely arbitrary and based on any one Commander or even soldier, in proximity to the ship wreck simply saying 'I think they were trying to return to the fight and think the had weapons they could use'.

That is EXACTLY the discretion the Statutes deliberately deny as it would be unworkable to allow each and everyone to simply determine that.

That is why the Statute DEMANDS that they be consider "out of battle"... no exceptions.
Click to expand...
Well like you said " And this does open the door to ALL future such disabled military personnel, American or other, being killed."
Now anybody, including Argentina, can attack any American boat , or even one of our navy ships , blow it up, disable it , and instead of picking up survivors like it says they are suppose to do in the GC, they can just go in and kill the rest of our people.
No this opens a can of worms and if any Americans get killed because of Trump's stupidity He should be held accountable.
The " second tap " was against art 14 of the GC. and Trump should be held accountable for that too.
 
Earl said:
You like being a loser?

You never served a day in your life and you claim to be an expert on command decisions made by those who do serve.

The drugs and drug gangs that poured into this country during the vegetable’s four years don’t resonate with you, do they?

The necessary life and death decisions made by those who do serve stay with them for the rest of their lives while you sit and nit-pick those decisions, in comfort, made possible, by our heroes.

You sit in comfort and security provided by those heroes and defend the very barbarians that they protect you from.

Sin verguenza indeed.
Click to expand...
Not a single argument here, just appeal to emotion.
 
Tbird19482 said:
Well like you said " And this does open the door to ALL future such disabled military personnel, American or other, being killed."
Now anybody, including Argentina, can attack any American boat , or even one of our navy ships , blow it up, disable it , and instead of picking up survivors like it says they are suppose to do in the GC, they can just go in and kill the rest of our people.
No this opens a can of worms and if any Americans get killed because of Trump's stupidity He should be held accountable.
The " second tap " was against art 14 of the GC. and Trump should be held accountable for that too.
Click to expand...
What part of this is confusing you?

Terrorists-like other non-state actors- are, by definition, not party to the Geneva Convention. They play by a different set of rules-if indeed there is any set of rules they follow.

Why the Geneva Conventions Don't Directly Apply to Terrorists:
  • State-Centric Framework: The Conventions are treaties between states (High Contracting Parties) and assume traditional warfare between recognized governments.
  • No Party Status: Terrorist groups (like al-Qaeda) aren't states, so they can't sign or be bound as parties to the Conventions, meaning their members aren't automatically entitled to Prisoner of War (POW) status.
 
Tbird19482 said:
Well like you said " And this does open the door to ALL future such disabled military personnel, American or other, being killed."
Now anybody, including Argentina, can attack any American boat , or even one of our navy ships , blow it up, disable it , and instead of picking up survivors like it says they are suppose to do in the GC, they can just go in and kill the rest of our people.
No this opens a can of worms and if any Americans get killed because of Trump's stupidity He should be held accountable.
The " second tap " was against art 14 of the GC. and Trump should be held accountable for that too.
Click to expand...
i think it is most dangerous when it comes to Russia and China, choosing to kill survivors rather than rescue them or just leave them alone, if rescuing is not a good option at the time.

There is no instance now America or any other nation can cry foul as all Russia or China would have to do when killing any 'out of combat' troops, is to say 'we believed they still posed a threat and were trying to return to the fight'.

there is no way to counter that 'belief', and if the 'belief' is enough to act upon, as Hegseth is arguing now, then a standard the US pushed for, more than any other nation over the past few decades, to protect not just US soldiers but all soldiers... is now dead.
 
Earl said:
What part of this is confusing you?

Terrorists-like other non-state actors- are, by definition, not party to the Geneva Convention. They play by a different set of rules-if indeed there is any set of rules they follow.
Click to expand...
They were not terrorists. The supply was supposedly cocaine. The boat was not on its way to the US.

Those are facts.
 
Earl said:
What part of this is confusing you?

Terrorists-like other non-state actors- are, by definition, not party to the Geneva Convention. They play by a different set of rules-if indeed there is any set of rules they follow.
Click to expand...
If Trump and Co can simply state 'foreign drug runners are now terrorists' do you also agree that other countries could also declare 'US gun runners are now terrorists' and rightfully target and kill them?
 
Here are the facts:

As of early 2025, the Trump administration has officially
designated several international drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs). This action is part of a broader policy where the administration has declared the U.S. to be in a "non-international armed conflict" with these groups, aiming to use military force against them similarly to how the U.S. has targeted
 
Earl said:
Here are the facts:

As of early 2025, the Trump administration has officially
designated several international drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs). This action is part of a broader policy where the administration has declared the U.S. to be in a "non-international armed conflict" with these groups, aiming to use military force against them similarly to how the U.S. has targeted
Click to expand...
What will they do? Blow or throw some cocaine at them?
 
Yes, during his presidency, Barack Obama frequently
declared specific groups and individuals as terrorists and referred to their actions as acts of terrorism. He launched extensive counterterrorism efforts to target and eliminate them.
 
Earl said:
What part of this is confusing you?

Terrorists-like other non-state actors- are, by definition, not party to the Geneva Convention. They play by a different set of rules-if indeed there is any set of rules they follow.

Why the Geneva Conventions Don't Directly Apply to Terrorists:
  • State-Centric Framework: The Conventions are treaties between states (High Contracting Parties) and assume traditional warfare between recognized governments.
  • No Party Status: Terrorist groups (like al-Qaeda) aren't states, so they can't sign or be bound as parties to the Conventions, meaning their members aren't automatically entitled to Prisoner of War (POW) status.
Click to expand...
As it has been pointed out by others on here THEY WERE NOT TERRORISTS .
 
Earl said:
Yes, during his presidency, Barack Obama frequently
declared specific groups and individuals as terrorists and referred to their actions as acts of terrorism. He launched extensive counterterrorism efforts to target and eliminate them.
Click to expand...
And those " Terrorists " had done things against the US and were not on a boat out in the middle of the ocean.
 
Jarod said:
I was incorrect about a prediction, that does not make one a loser. You are really an unhappy person.
Click to expand...
Your posts make you a loser.

They are akin to children posting.

I am pleased as punch to point out thst you did not serve and know nothing about command control, but criticize those who do serve and protect your sorry ass.
 
Earl said:
Your posts make you a loser.

They are akin to children posting.

I am pleased as punch to point out thst you did not serve and know nothing about command control, but criticize this who do serve and protect your sorry ass.
Click to expand...
All you got is emotion. I understand. Your world view has come to this, emotional tripe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top