Registration WILL lead to CONFISCATION. Don't trust the takers.

The above is what occurs when the liberals of this board have lost an argument. They start proclaiming how awesome it was to 'skewer you' or how they 'dismantled your argument' etc... etc...

They seem to forget that everyone can still see the posts on the thread. There was a thrashing on this thread... but reality is a far cry from what occurred in Lorax's fantasy world.

I lost nothing. The OP is the same kind of fearmongering & absolutism that Kreiger has consistenly lambasted the left for on gun control.

It's the same. There is no amount of spin he or you can provide to finesse your way around that. It's the same.
 
I love my country and neither hate nor fear anyone. I have never wanted to own a gun and have only ever handled and fired a faiground gun. So I cannot accept what you say.

Yet you want to take away another persons possessions? You don't hate them, but because YOU don't personally own a gun, NO ONE should?

You do display fear when you run around screaming that guns are evil and should be taken away. Guns are inanimate objects. The vast majority of people that use them are law abiding citizens. You wish to punish the law abiding citizens for the actions of the minority that violate the law... all because of your fear.
 
I lost nothing. The OP is the same kind of fearmongering & absolutism that Kreiger has consistenly lambasted the left for on gun control.

It's the same. There is no amount of spin he or you can provide to finesse your way around that. It's the same.

As I stated, in your fantasy world you were like the most awesome of winners!

Here in reality you were made a fool of... again. No wonder you liked arguing with yurt so much. At least then you might actually be the smarter of the two.
 
I lost nothing. The OP is the same kind of fearmongering & absolutism that Kreiger has consistenly lambasted the left for on gun control.

It's the same. There is no amount of spin he or you can provide to finesse your way around that. It's the same.

And again, your presumption is not made from previous evidence, Grinds is.
 
As I stated, in your fantasy world you were like the most awesome of winners!

Here in reality you were made a fool of... again. No wonder you liked arguing with yurt so much. At least then you might actually be the smarter of the two.

I expected this sort of puerile response. I suspect that you already realize you stepped in it.

Articulate your position then. I explained to Kreiger that his argument would be okay if he had used "can" instead of "will." But he didn't.

So, explain why this isn't the same kind of fearmongering and hyperbole that he (and you) criticize the left for on gun control. I'll all ears.
 
More Rightie insanity...

If you're going to pretend that your idiot claim that one day "it will" is a statement of fact, then conversely, every single second of every single minute of every single hour of every single day that ticks off the clock BEFORE it becomes a statement of fact, it is instead a total bullshit falsehood.

Thanks for playing!

Actually, the second that the banning thats effect will only confirm that the statement "it will" has always been the fact.
 
I expected this sort of puerile response. I suspect that you already realize you stepped in it.

Another sign that you know you have lost. The wonderful condescending tone of the 'intellectual liberal'.

That said, I did indeed step in it. It is hard to avoid all the crap you have spread around this thread.

Articulate your position then. I explained to Kreiger that his argument would be okay if he had used "can" instead of "will." But he didn't.

The position was already articulated, you simply refuse to accept anything that goes against your fantasy world views. It was explained to you why 'will' is acceptable in this case. It is not fear mongering as we have already seen the Dems use incremental steps to achieve their longer term objectives. We have already heard Dems call for the BAN of certain types of guns and magazine capacities. Yet you think it will stop there. It won't. Why? Because even if you ban them... the next level of gun and mag size will be your next target the second another incident occurs.

If you think banning mags that hold 10+ rounds will stop anything... again, for the billionth time... how fast can a person change clips? If a person with two 45's with 8 rounds each plus back up clips comes in a room, are those kids any less dead? Do you honestly expect us to believe that you wouldn't then be screaming for them to be banned?

You are not solving anything by banning those guns or mag sizes. You know that. But your knee jerk response is to ban the weapons/mag sizes. Out of fear.

You are shown an example of a country that did the registration. You were shown what it led to. It wasn't an overnight thing... it took 20 years. That is what we recognize. That is what you wish to ignore. You pretend we cannot hear the cries of the fear mongers demanding guns be banned. The pretense that it is just certain types of guns with certain magazine capacities is not fooling anyone.
 
Another sign that you know you have lost. The wonderful condescending tone of the 'intellectual liberal'.

That said, I did indeed step in it. It is hard to avoid all the crap you have spread around this thread.



The position was already articulated, you simply refuse to accept anything that goes against your fantasy world views. It was explained to you why 'will' is acceptable in this case. It is not fear mongering as we have already seen the Dems use incremental steps to achieve their longer term objectives. We have already heard Dems call for the BAN of certain types of guns and magazine capacities. Yet you think it will stop there. It won't. Why? Because even if you ban them... the next level of gun and mag size will be your next target the second another incident occurs.

If you think banning mags that hold 10+ rounds will stop anything... again, for the billionth time... how fast can a person change clips? If a person with two 45's with 8 rounds each plus back up clips comes in a room, are those kids any less dead? Do you honestly expect us to believe that you wouldn't then be screaming for them to be banned?

You are not solving anything by banning those guns or mag sizes. You know that. But your knee jerk response is to ban the weapons/mag sizes. Out of fear.

You are shown an example of a country that did the registration. You were shown what it led to. It wasn't an overnight thing... it took 20 years. That is what we recognize. That is what you wish to ignore. You pretend we cannot hear the cries of the fear mongers demanding guns be banned. The pretense that it is just certain types of guns with certain magazine capacities is not fooling anyone.

I expected this as well. You're actually smart, so you know you're wrong - so you just wrote a lot of words & are hoping no one notices. Like a high schooler BS'ing on an essay.

The reasoning is not "acceptable," UNLESS you accept the same kind of argument & reasoning from the gun control side, which you don't. You only accept it from Kreiger, because you're peas in a pod on this issue.

I'm not going to go back & forth with your "energizer bunny of incorrectness" thing all day. It ends with this: Registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation, therefore the absolute statement of the thread title is wrong.

The end.
 
I expected this as well. You're actually smart, so you know you're wrong - so you just wrote a lot of words & are hoping no one notices. Like a high schooler BS'ing on an essay.

The reasoning is not "acceptable," UNLESS you accept the same kind of argument & reasoning from the gun control side, which you don't. You only accept it from Kreiger, because you're peas in a pod on this issue.

I'm not going to go back & forth with your "energizer bunny of incorrectness" thing all day. It ends with this: Registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation, therefore the absolute statement of the thread title is wrong.

The end.

After The End, there's supposed to be an Epilogue where you look back and admit that you lost.
 
I expected this as well. You're actually smart, so you know you're wrong - so you just wrote a lot of words & are hoping no one notices. Like a high schooler BS'ing on an essay.

The reasoning is not "acceptable," UNLESS you accept the same kind of argument & reasoning from the gun control side, which you don't. You only accept it from Kreiger, because you're peas in a pod on this issue.

I'm not going to go back & forth with your "energizer bunny of incorrectness" thing all day. It ends with this: Registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation, therefore the absolute statement of the thread title is wrong.

The end.

LMAO... I expected the above line of crap from you. You ask for a response and rather than address anything I stated, you do the 'I won' liberal dance.

Don't worry, you are not the first liberal idiot to run away from answering the questions, you won't be the last either.

Why is it answering scares you so much Lorax?

If you think banning mags that hold 10+ rounds will stop anything... again, for the billionth time... how fast can a person change clips? If a person with two 45's with 8 rounds each plus back up clips comes in a room, are those kids any less dead? Do you honestly expect us to believe that you wouldn't then be screaming for them to be banned?
 
Just as aside on the thread in general, I find it consistently amazing that those on the NRA side of things accuse the left of "fearmongering" on the issue, but when it comes to their own hysterical claims of "theys comin' to take all of y'all's guns, America!", it's just a "statement of fact."
 
After The End, there's supposed to be an Epilogue where you look back and admit that you lost.

He is an idiot. He still actually believes he has made valid points on this thread. He thinks by saying 'you know you're wrong' that somehow he will Jedi mind fuck us into thinking he is right. Jedi mind tricks do not work on me.
 
LMAO... I expected the above line of crap from you. You ask for a response and rather than address anything I stated, you do the 'I won' liberal dance.

Don't worry, you are not the first liberal idiot to run away from answering the questions, you won't be the last either.

Why is it answering scares you so much Lorax?

If you think banning mags that hold 10+ rounds will stop anything... again, for the billionth time... how fast can a person change clips? If a person with two 45's with 8 rounds each plus back up clips comes in a room, are those kids any less dead? Do you honestly expect us to believe that you wouldn't then be screaming for them to be banned?

What does that have to do w/ the thread title, which is where Kreiger apparently "made a fool of me?"

Oh...what's that? You're shifting the goalposts, because you know you were wrong?

Got it. Like I said: "The End." I'm not doing this sillyness w/ you all day.
 
What does that have to do w/ the thread title, which is where Kreiger apparently "made a fool of me?"

Oh...what's that? You're shifting the goalposts, because you know you were wrong?

Got it. Like I said: "The End." I'm not doing this sillyness w/ you all day.

It is not shifting the goal posts you moron. It is a question designed to get you to comprehend the path that is being laid out before us by the fear mongers.

You continually dodging the question is a good sign that you know we are right.

Registration is simply going to lead to the eventual confiscation of weapons... one type of gun/mag at at time.

So you can scream 'The End' all you like as we all know what you are really saying is 'I am an idiot in way over my head'
 
Back
Top