Refugee worker 'stabbed by 15-year-old asylum seeker' in Sweden

I've got room for a couple. Unfortunately, the government is scares of refugees. Would that be because it was the government that bombed their country ?

When would the young man have witnessed such event? Sweden has bombed Somalia when exactly? Perhaps Lebanon is the culprit?
 
Europe is witnessing the rise of rightist extremism. The UK, for example, has a weak right-wing government that is highly susceptible to extreme-right pressures. Other European governments are also influenced and everybody is waiting for leadership that will fill the void created by the collapse of Merkel's moral initiative. It's a lot like the 1930s- only this time the fascists have cover.
Your own right-wing views contribute to the darkening skies, of course.

Cameron's government is far from weak, they have a comfortable working majority and the Labour party is in total disarray under Jeremy Corbyn.
 
Cameron's government is far from weak, they have a comfortable working majority and the Labour party is in total disarray under Jeremy Corbyn.

Viewed from here Cameron was ' elected ' by 24% of a 60% voter turnout and his government has a majority of just twelve. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Further, the socialist, Corbyn has amassed huge support amongst the ' rank and file '- ' workers ' I think that means- and is gaining strength by the month. Hasn't he just succeeded in weeding out some more right-wing ' plants ' from his party ?
 
When would the young man have witnessed such event? Sweden has bombed Somalia when exactly? Perhaps Lebanon is the culprit?

Most European governments, Sweden included, have had a hand in attacks upon the Middle East. It's part of their ' allegiance ' to the U.S.A's commitment to the ' security of Israel '.

And I didn't say that Sweden had bombed Somalia. I said that governments which had taken part in bombings were frightened of the refugees they have created.
 
Viewed from here Cameron was ' elected ' by 24% of a 60% voter turnout and his government has a majority of just twelve. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Further, the socialist, Corbyn has amassed huge support amongst the ' rank and file '- ' workers ' I think that means- and is gaining strength by the month. Hasn't he just succeeded in weeding out some more right-wing ' plants ' from his party ?

The overall majority is 16 not 12! However, as so often in life, it is not as simple as that. The Conservatives can usually count on the the Democratic Unionist Party and the Ulster Unionists which is good for another 10 votes. UKIP will usually vote with them if it is not EU related, so that gives a comfortable working majority of 27!

Corbyn does have considerable support amongst the rank and file but very little amongst the Parliamentary party and more importantly the country. I want a strong opposition however because he is so bereft of talent that he is left with chancers, losers and incompetents for the most part to fill the Shadow Cabinet posts. He will not last much longer though, I would point out that a similar situation occurred in the 30's, just to prove that there is very little new under the Sun. George Lansbury was very much cut from the same cloth as Jeremy Corbyn, even down to having the same pacifist credentials.

George Lansbury, PC (22 February 1859 – 7 May 1940) was a British politician and social reformer who led the Labour Party from 1932 to 1935. Apart from a brief period of ministerial office during the Labour government of 1929–31, he spent his political life campaigning against established authority and vested interests, his main causes being the promotion of social justice, women's rights and world disarmament. Originally a radical Liberal, Lansbury converted to socialism in the early 1890s, and thereafter served his local community in the East End of London in numerous elective offices. His activities were underpinned by his Christian beliefs which, except for a short period of doubt, sustained him through his life. Elected to parliament in 1910, he resigned his seat in 1912 to campaign for women's suffrage, and was briefly imprisoned after publicly supporting militant action.

In 1912 Lansbury helped to establish the Daily Herald newspaper, and became its editor. Throughout the First World War the paper maintained a strongly pacifist stance, and supported the October 1917 Russian Revolution. These positions contributed to Lansbury's failure to be elected to parliament in 1918. He devoted himself to local politics in his home borough of Poplar, and went to prison with 30 fellow-councillors for his part in the Poplar "rates revolt" of 1921.

After his return to parliament in 1922, Lansbury was denied office in the brief Labour government of 1924, although he served as First Commissioner of Works in the Labour government of 1929–31. After the political and economic crisis of August 1931 Lansbury did not follow his leader, Ramsay MacDonald, into the National Government, but stayed with the Labour Party. As the most senior of the small contingent of Labour MPs that survived the 1931 general election, Lansbury became the party's leader. His pacifism and his opposition to rearmament in the face of rising European fascism put him at odds with his party, and when his position was rejected at the 1935 party conference he resigned the leadership. He spent his final years travelling through the United States and Europe in the cause of peace and disarmament.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lansbury
 
Last edited:
Most European governments, Sweden included, have had a hand in attacks upon the Middle East. It's part of their ' allegiance ' to the U.S.A's commitment to the ' security of Israel '.

And I didn't say that Sweden had bombed Somalia. I said that governments which had taken part in bombings were frightened of the refugees they have created.

So you are making assumptions without merit. The young boy was, at best, indoctrinated. I am glad that others, those who stopped the young man, did not do so based on having witnessed Gov bombing of their countries.
Please stop digging.
 
I am very pleased to read that other refugees stopped the killer. I also wonder why young men don't stay and fight for their own country? It puzzles me. Not trying to be difficult, but again, trying to make sense of it all.

Because this is a coordinated attack by the muslime world

That the entire world should be under Sharia is a common belief held by a majority of muslimes. Not all want to do it by violent means. They are slowly bending the world to their religion and squishy leftists are complicit
 
For right-wing racist nutters anything any immigrant does is the responsibility of all immigrants, whereas anything bad any right-wing nutter does has nothing to do with the rest.
 
So you are making assumptions without merit.

I've just justified my assumptions. Sweden has been involved in attacking the Middle East. It's very safe to assume that the Swedish government fears the refugees which its attacks have created. You display a certain myopia.

The young boy was, at best, indoctrinated.

Evidence please, or withdraw.

I am glad that others, those who stopped the young man, did not do so based on having witnessed Gov bombing of their countries.

Your gladness must be comforting- although it appears based upon unjustified assumptions of your own.

Please stop digging.

For pity's sake, show some originality.
 
Because this is a coordinated attack by the muslime world

You think that an univestigated knife attack by a fifteen-year-old in Sweden evidences ' a coordinated attack by the muslime world ' [sic] ?

Incidentally, there's no mention of any ammunition in the Second Amendment. The Founding Fathers might have had you in mind.
 
Cameron's government is far from weak, they have a comfortable working majority and the Labour party is in total disarray under Jeremy Corbyn.

Incidentally, here's your leader ;

David Cameron is facing calls to apologise for calling refugees at a camp in Calais "a bunch of migrants" at Prime Minister's Questions.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35419090

Clearly another spoon-fed arse from the stable of British upper-class twits. He'll get your vote.
 
Incidentally, here's your leader ;



Clearly another spoon-fed arse from the stable of British upper-class twits. He'll get your vote.

He is absolutely right, they shouldn't be there in the first place. I told you about the Dublin Regulation already but you are one stubborn prat. They ended up there after paying people smugglers vast sums of money, if they were genuine refugees then they would be more than happy to arrive in the first safe country and get registered and fingerprinted there. That they didn't show that they are far more interested in going to a country of their choice for economic reasons. We have absolutely no obligations under any treaty to take them in. Finally the EU is seeing sense and forcing Greece in particular to face up to its obligations and not just wave them all through. I frankly couldn't give a flying fuck if you don't like that!
 
so one insane refugee does a crime and his knife wielding arse is stopped by dozens of refugees from harming anyone else and you guys say hey should all be punished for it.



You people are sicko
 
You think that an univestigated knife attack by a fifteen-year-old in Sweden evidences ' a coordinated attack by the muslime world ' [sic] ?

Incidentally, there's no mention of any ammunition in the Second Amendment. The Founding Fathers might have had you in mind.

This filthy muslimes attack is not. The influx of muslimes is. What better way to invade a country without firing a shot?
 
Back
Top