Garland isn’t incompetent he’s thorough.Garland is incompetent. Tired of this. Maybe our nation will become fascist.
Garland isn’t incompetent he’s thorough.
It takes evidence, solid evidence to indict a former President, unfortunately, the evidence has to be solid in order to get a conviction. If he prosecutes, you know the case is solid. He still has time to do so. It’s not over, yet. His prosecution also has to be seen as being non political. Announcing something before the election would make it political.About what? He never said he was going to indict Trump for the violent insurrection.
Garland isn’t incompetent he’s thorough.
It takes evidence, solid evidence to indict a former President, unfortunately, the evidence has to be solid in order to get a conviction. If he prosecutes, you know the case is solid. He still has time to do so. It’s not over, yet. His prosecution also has to be seen as being non political. Announcing something before the election would make it political.
It takes evidence, solid evidence to indict a former President, unfortunately, the evidence has to be solid in order to get a conviction. If he prosecutes, you know the case is solid. He still has time to do so. It’s not over, yet. His prosecution also has to be seen as being non political. Announcing something before the election would make it political.
You’re opinion is not base on fact being Garland is very successful at his job. 100% conviction rate isn’t a sign of incompetence.AG Garland is incompetent. Biden should fire him.
Trump wasn't responsible for the riot. Paid FBI instigators like Ray Epps and tower megaphone man were.About what? He never said he was going to indict Trump for the violent insurrection.
Garland is a criminalYou’re opinion is not base on fact being Garland is very successful at his job. 100% conviction rate isn’t a sign of incompetence.
Merrick Garland has a 100% conviction rate.
https://mobile.twitter.com › status![]()
[h=3]J. Spencer (he) on Twitter: "Merrick Garland has a 100% conviction rate." / Twitter[/h]
It takes evidence, solid evidence to indict a former President, unfortunately, the evidence has to be solid in order to get a conviction. If he prosecutes, you know the case is solid. He still has time to do so. It’s not over, yet. His prosecution also has to be seen as being non political. Announcing something before the election would make it political.
Garland is a criminal
There was never an enumerated Constitutional right to an abortion.The GOP blew it. They should have won this election going away.
But they installed a radical right-wing SCOTUS, got Roe overturned, and then let Trump go full Trump w/ conspiracy theories & racism (and they're SO afraid of him that they can't even comment on either), and here we are. Independents may not be happy with Democrats - but the GOP is no alternative for them right now.
There was never an enumerated Constitutional right to an abortion.
Trump is not a racist, you are.
It takes evidence, solid evidence to indict a former President, unfortunately, the evidence has to be solid in order to get a conviction. If he prosecutes, you know the case is solid. He still has time to do so. It’s not over, yet. His prosecution also has to be seen as being non political. Announcing something before the election would make it political.
Try arguing that 1st point to the over 70% of Americans who support a woman's right to choose. That ruling only appealed to the right-wing fringe. It alienated most independents.
As for the 2nd point - I'm actually not a racist. Trump, on the other hand, just made a blatantly racist comment about a leading Republican's wife. And Republican politicians - a group of cowards even on their best day - are afraid to say anything about it.
How are the predictions from a few months ago about a Red Wave shaping up?