USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
That and the vulnerability of the child.
Pedophiles can't control an adult, so they find weaker (young) victims.
That and the vulnerability of the child.
Pedophiles can't control an adult, so they find weaker (young) victims.
Socrtease
Verified User
Agreed.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
This is nothing more then fear mongering, by a specific set of society; because they don't agree with it and therefore they feel that they have the right to dictate how others should live their lives.
It's a take off, on an old truth:
Repeat a lie long enough and you'll convince someone that it's the truth.
This "connection" between child molesters and homosexuality, is nothing more then an attempt to further denigrate the homosexual.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
No, I have evidence that a higher percentage of queers are pedophiles.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
But you have no evidence that societal acceptance of homosexuality will result in more gays.
You have no evidence at all that society would ever accept pedophilia.
In other words, you are blowing smoke.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
About a third of the reports of molestation by the populace have involved homosexuality. Likewise, between a fifth and a third of those who have been caught and/or convicted practiced homosexuality. Finally, a fifth to a third of surveyed gays admitted to child molestation. All-in-all, a rather consistent story.
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Since when is me being surprised, over you throwing a hissy, proof that I'm throwing a hissy.
Your cognitive skills have suffered greatly and your vision has narrowed to a tiny little point!!!
Now please stop throwing a hissy, over your assumption that I'm doing so.
.Look who's throwing a hissy- you. Use more exclamation points next time.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Child molestation is not to be taken lightly. Officials at a facility which serves about 1,500 runaway youngsters each year estimate that about half of the boys have been homosexually abused and 90% of the girls heterosexually assaulted.http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/
W
WinterBorn
Guest
It is a completely different topic. Pedophilia is not the same as homosexuality. As USF said, your claim is fear mongering.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Who has ever said anything that even vaguely resembles taking child molestation lightly.
The closest is your claim there is a connection with homosexuality. You are trying to lump two things together.
The rest of us despise child molestation for what it is, and do not confuse it with any personal hatred.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
From prior link
What Homosexuals Admit
The 1948 Kinsey survey found that 37% of the gays and 2% of the lesbians admitted to sexual relations with under-17-yr-olds, and 28% of the gays and 1% of the lesbians admitted to sexual relations with under-16-yr-olds while they themselves were aged 18 or older. (18)
In 1970 the Kinsey Institute interviewed 565 white gays in San Francisco: 25% of them admitted to having had sex with boys aged 16 or younger while they themselves were at least 21. (19)
In The Gay Report, 23% of the gays and 6% of the lesbians admitted to sexual interaction with youth less than 16 years of age. (20)
What Homosexuals Admit
The 1948 Kinsey survey found that 37% of the gays and 2% of the lesbians admitted to sexual relations with under-17-yr-olds, and 28% of the gays and 1% of the lesbians admitted to sexual relations with under-16-yr-olds while they themselves were aged 18 or older. (18)
In 1970 the Kinsey Institute interviewed 565 white gays in San Francisco: 25% of them admitted to having had sex with boys aged 16 or younger while they themselves were at least 21. (19)
In The Gay Report, 23% of the gays and 6% of the lesbians admitted to sexual interaction with youth less than 16 years of age. (20)
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Its funny, you ridicule and dispute the Kinsey report when it comes to gays as a percentage of the population. But now you want to use the same reports as evidence?
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Have you ever read any of the critiques of Kinsey's homosexual sampling populations?
The biggest was that the repressive atmosphere of the times, he could not find the bulk of the homosexual population. He resorted to doing focused sampling within inner city "delinquent" populations. This gave a decided slant to the research.
In other words, unless you admit hypocrisy and ignore legitimate criticisms, your claims are still bogus.
1948? Are you seriously basing your argument on a 62 year old study?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
I use the data in the report not its faulty conclusion.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
The data in the report is the same, whether you are examing homosexual practices or how many there are in the population.
You accept the claims based on delinquient populations only, but reject the same data that claims gays make up 10% of the population?
Socrtease
Verified User
Translation: When it suits me I will use the data of a report that I think is bullshit if it can help me continue to hold faulty assumptions about the homosexual population.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Translation: SocTeaser got pwned by the facts so attacks using more faulty logic.
Socrtease
Verified User
No you have decided that the Kinsey report is valid when it comes to extrapolating numbers of homosexuals that say they had sex with 16 and 17 year olds but not when it comes to the SAME study using those SAME numbers to extrapolate the percentage of homosexuals in the population. I don't expect you to get it, but everyone else does.Translation: SocTeaser got pwned by the facts so attacks using more faulty logic.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Translation: SocTeaser got pwned by the facts so attacks using more faulty logic.
No SM, he is right.
You use the 1948 Kinsey report to make claims about the gay population as a whole, but reject the same report when it shows something you dislike.
The data was used to make a conclusion in both situations.
You want to use the data to say the percentages of gays who had contact with younger partners shows accurate data concerning the entire gay population.
But you don't want to use the data in the same report to show how large the gay population is.
That is cherry-picking and hypocrisy, regardless of any insults you may want to throw out there.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Wrong. I used some stats, not conclusions. Poor ass-licking SocTeaser just can't let this shit go.