"Reasonable suspision"

Yurt said:
imo...jarod is right about florida law...a little bit of alcohol alone is not reasonable suspicion to conduct any further testing...
Click to expand...

Hold on a sec.... How can a police officer smell your breath while you are driving down the road????? Wouldn't there have to be some other thing happen, before the officer was able to smell alcohol on your breath? It defies logic otherwise, unless LEO's have some kine of canine smelling ability I am not aware of.

Observing someone weaving in the road, is all that an officer needs to make a traffic stop! Trust me, I have first hand experience with this. From that point, if they also smell alcohol on your breath, it is reasonable for them to assume you have consumed some amount of alcohol. At that point, probable cause exists to conduct further testing.
 
Dixie said:
Hold on a sec.... How can a police officer smell your breath while you are driving down the road????? Wouldn't there have to be some other thing happen, before the officer was able to smell alcohol on your breath? It defies logic otherwise, unless LEO's have some kine of canine smelling ability I am not aware of.

Observing someone weaving in the road, is all that an officer needs to make a traffic stop! Trust me, I have first hand experience with this. From that point, if they also smell alcohol on your breath, it is reasonable for them to assume you have consumed some amount of alcohol. At that point, probable cause exists to conduct further testing.
Click to expand...

So does having a broken tail light, driving with your brights on (with oncoming traffic), driving at night without your lights on, failure to stop at a Stop Sign, failure to signal a turn, etc.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then show the DUI Statuates that support your assertion; unless you've discovered that the way it's written makes you appear to be a bigger fool then you're already making of yourself.

By the way; anytime you have to resort to attempt to denigrate, by making gender substitution, it's an admission that you know you've lost and are only trying to find a way out of the corner you've painted yourself into.

Just think how easy you could claim victory.
All you have to do, is cite the Florida State Law that supports your assertion.
Click to expand...

i knew you were a girl....

too bad you don't feel a florida supreme court ruling on what are examples of reasonable suspicion (re DUI) is not state law....

just shows what an ignoramus you are

i think dixie is even laughing that you think citing florida supreme court precedent about reasonable suspicion is not citing florida state law....

come on dixie...am i right? did i cite case law or not?
 
Dixie said:
Hold on a sec.... How can a police officer smell your breath while you are driving down the road????? Wouldn't there have to be some other thing happen, before the officer was able to smell alcohol on your breath? It defies logic otherwise, unless LEO's have some kine of canine smelling ability I am not aware of.

Observing someone weaving in the road, is all that an officer needs to make a traffic stop! Trust me, I have first hand experience with this. From that point, if they also smell alcohol on your breath, it is reasonable for them to assume you have consumed some amount of alcohol. At that point, probable cause exists to conduct further testing.
Click to expand...

as the case i cited mentioned, you need reasonable suspicion to pull the vehicle over....and you then need reasonable suspicion to conduct a field sobriety test....once again:

To request that a driver submit to field sobriety tests, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion that the individual is driving under the influence. In State v. Taylor, 648 So. 2d 701, 703-04 (Fla. 1995), the supreme court provided an example of what constitutes “reasonable suspicion” sufficient to conduct a DUI investigation:

Page 4

When [the defendant] exited his car, he staggered and exhibited slurred speech, watery, bloodshot eyes, and a strong odor of alcohol. This, combined with a high rate of speed on the highway, was more than enough to provide [the officer] with reasonable suspicion that a crime was being committed, i.e., DUI. The officer was entitled under section 901.151 to conduct a reasonable inquiry to confirm or deny that probable cause existed to make an arrest. [The officer's] request that [the defendant] perform field sobriety tests was reasonable under the circumstances and did not violate any Fourth Amendment rights.
Click to expand...

http://www.miami-criminal-lawyer.net/caselaw/2010/05/page/2/
 
Yurt said:
i knew you were a girl....

too bad you don't feel a florida supreme court ruling on what are examples of reasonable suspicion (re DUI) is not state law....

just shows what an ignoramus you are

i think dixie is even laughing that you think citing florida supreme court precedent about reasonable suspicion is not citing florida state law....

come on dixie...am i right? did i cite case law or not?
Click to expand...

Now you are being truly pathetic.
Instead of providing the Florida DUI statuate, you've gone begging for help.

MY GAWD MAN.
AT LEAST HAVE A LITTLE SELF RESPECT. :cof1:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Now you are being truly pathetic.
Instead of providing the Florida DUI statuate, you've gone begging for help.

MY GAWD MAN.
AT LEAST HAVE A LITTLE SELF RESPECT. :cof1:
Click to expand...

lmao....

the courts interpret statutes you moron

hence, the fsc case i cited trumps anything you've posted....

i wish morons like you made me feel smart, unfortunately, i'm saddened that there are so many americans like you out there

whats worse is that you are allowed to vote...
 
Yurt said:
lmao....

the courts interpret statutes you moron

hence, the fsc case i cited trumps anything you've posted....

i wish morons like you made me feel smart, unfortunately, i'm saddened that there are so many americans like you out there

whats worse is that you are allowed to vote...
Click to expand...

And that Florida State DUI law says what??
 
Yurt said:
you're just trolling....i get it now....

i've only posted it 3 times....

you're on a troll today....did legion give you it to you good?
Click to expand...

NO, you have not posted the Florida DUI statuate.
What you've done is post a singel case from 1995.

Please save what little dignity you have left and allow yourself to stop. :good4u:
 
How interesting!!

Yurt gets his backside sorely spanked and suddenly a troll appears. :cof1:

Yurt, this is not looking good for you; but then none of your presentations helped you either. :palm:

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
NO, you have not posted the Florida DUI statuate.
What you've done is post a singel case from 1995.

Please save what little dignity you have left and allow yourself to stop. :good4u:
Click to expand...

:palm:

good lord....what a liar

i posted a may 2010 case that cited the seminole florida supreme court case explaining what reasonable suspicion is.....

you seriously are a dick...i mean if i hadn't already told you that it was a 2010 case citing the still valid florida supreme court case, fine...but i have...you seriously are nothing but a dishonest troll...

you act as if that "one" supreme court case is somehow not valid....what a loser, seriously, i've explained to you how it is still valid and that it is seminole....citing it is in fact citing good law

you're a waste of time on this issue
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
NO, you have not posted the Florida DUI statuate.
What you've done is post a singel case from 1995.

Please save what little dignity you have left and allow yourself to stop. :good4u:
Click to expand...

What he posted was a ruling on what reasonable suspicion was in that particular case looked like. I think you boyz may need to find out what is not reasonable suspicion...

for instance a driver is pulled over at 2 AM with a headlight out. He smell like alcohol when handing his license to the cop...he seems coherent, but the officer looks at his bloodshot eyes; the time; and the smell of alcohol...he requests a field sobriety test...is that enough for reasonable suspicion?
 
what is even more funny is that legion gave up his argument way back and has now gone back to just trolling.....

but USF....continues....:cof1:
 
Ice Dancer said:
What he posted was a ruling on what reasonable suspicion was in that particular case looked like. I think you boyz may need to find out what is not reasonable suspicion...

for instance a driver is pulled over at 2 AM with a headlight out. He smell like alcohol when handing his license to the cop...he seems coherent, but the officer looks at his bloodshot eyes; the time; and the smell of alcohol...he requests a field sobriety test...is that enough for reasonable suspicion?
Click to expand...

no....that florida supreme court ruling is instructive on all DUI cases after 1995
 
Yurt said:
:palm:

good lord....what a liar

i posted a may 2010 case that cited the seminole florida supreme court case explaining what reasonable suspicion is.....

you seriously are a dick...i mean if i hadn't already told you that it was a 2010 case citing the still valid florida supreme court case, fine...but i have...you seriously are nothing but a dishonest troll...

you act as if that "one" supreme court case is somehow not valid....what a loser, seriously, i've explained to you how it is still valid and that it is seminole....citing it is in fact citing good law

you're a waste of time on this issue
Click to expand...

I didn't address you 2010 case; because it had nothing to do the Florida DUI statuate and I figured you errored, in your need to try and grasp at straws.
If this has anything to do with DUI's, please show where.'

Now, have you been able to find the Florida DUI statute??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top