reality of recount

tsuke said:
i dont think you understand this recount. The margins involved means that only one result can change the outcoume. Hacking by a third party to change the vote. Counting the votes again just gives you less than +1000. The only way it is relevant is if hacking was done to literally change the outcome.

If that is the case and by everyones admission the voting machines used in all elections were around for the 2008 and 2012 election then all 3 elections are called into question. Especially since the candidate who was softer on russia won 100% of the time.
Click to expand...

I understand that once again a right wing wonk has managed to distort an action to fit the "git Obama" that the GOP has been wailing since the inauguration in 2008. You have no basis in reality for your "math" other than your personal opinion, supposition and conjecture.

The recounts are to show that the electoral votes in the states questioned either reflect the popular vote or not, as well as concluding just how bad Trump lost the popular vote. So far, it's the latter.
 
cawacko said:
It's amazing, Republicans and Democrats don't agree on much but when one of their own doesn't vote for the party candidate they go apocalyptic.
Click to expand...

Rune's just a crank .. mindlessly parroting the party line and other silliness. that's why I have him/her on IA.
 
Stretch said:
George Soros Financed Hillary Clinton’s Recount Lawyer Marc Elias

The lawyer representing Hillary Clinton’s recount efforts recently led legal battles against state voting laws with an infusion of funding from billionaire George Soros.
On Saturday, Marc Elias, the Clinton team’s general counsel, announced Clinton’s campaign would participate in Green Party candidate Jill Stein’s recount effort in Wisconsin. Elias also said the Clinton campaign would participate if Stein decides to pursue recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Elias is a senior lawyer at the Perkins Coie law firm, which also represents Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

Complete story............
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ney-leading-hillary-clintons-recount-efforts/
Click to expand...

And your point? Because Soros wasn't backing Bernie or Stein throughout the primaries or elections.
 
anatta said:
On the back of a debunked fear of election tampering in key swing states, the Green Party presidential candidate raised nearly $5 million to fund a recount effort.

Stein first set a goal to raise $2.5 million to fund a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania based off a report from New York Magazine that said prominent cybersecurity experts were urging Hillary Clinton’s campaign to contest the results there, citing suspicious results.

Since that New York Magazine story on Tuesday, one of the cybersecurity experts clarified that he did not have evidence suggesting that the election had been hacked, while election gurus like the New York Times Upshot’s Nate Cohn and FiveThirtyEight explained why it was unlikely that there was evidence showing a
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/jill-stein-recount-effort-231829

I smell clinton's handiwork behind all this
Click to expand...
d
Blow yer nose, kid. All this does is confirm that Trump does NOT have the mandate of the people, and the Green Party may have life in the upcoming elections. Hillary is now regulated commentator status.
 
The Only Sarge said:
On the news this morning Stein admitted there is ZERO indication of any fraud/hacking.
It is nothing more than a publicity stunt brought on by the big Hypocrite Hillary and the Democratic Party of Fruitcakes.
Click to expand...

A baseless charge, as she officially didn't back the recount until AFTER it got funding and traction. Bottom line: The Greens may get some life in upcoming local elections, and the Trumpster does not have the mandate of the people.
 
NOVA said:
While Trump seems to be willing to mend fences with some of the Republicans that savaged him in the campaign, the liberals are being exposed as
the party of intolerant haters ....
Click to expand...

What planet are you on? Faced with FACT that he lost the popular vote, Trump stupidly tweets his "it's all rigged" BS and pulls stuff out of his butt about voter fraud. That his flip-flopping on his major campaign promises and has NOT apologized on ANY of his racist rhetoric is a matter of fact and history!
 
The Only Sarge said:
What?!!
This is bullshit.
Here are some worthless links to shit for you!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Stooges
http://www.webmd.com/men/guide/male-masturbation-5-things-you-didnt-know#1
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...nsects-entomophagy-science-food-bugs-beetles/

There that'll fix your ass.
Click to expand...

Here's a homework assignment for you: find out how many people didn't vote, how many voted for a 3rd party, how many did a write in vote. When you see the comparison, you'll conclude that it was NOT third party voters who tipped the scale for Trump.
 
Ralph said:
Regardless of purpose....what they are exposing is the fact...."if"...the Green Party candidate had not run in these 3 states....Hillary would have kicked Trumps ass with at least a 272 EC vote count. Someone is paying these ignorant folk to look for any reason not to dismiss Trump votes but to invalidate the Green Party Votes. Only In America. :) Jill Stein stole more than enough support from Hillary to put her over the top in all 3 blue wall states. Again...this is the election that just keeps giving and giving and giving....in the fact of exposing democrat stupidity. Its a sad thing that Jill Stein can't "post facto" sell her votes to Hillary, I'd wager that big daddy George Soros would fork over BILLIONS for those few votes.
Click to expand...


You have no proof of what you say. Also, all one has to do is compare the number of people who did not vote to those who voted 3rd party or a write in to see what tipped the scales in Trump's favor. remember, the GOP traditionally does better with low voter turn out.
 
Taichiliberal said:
d
Blow yer nose, kid. All this does is confirm that Trump does NOT have the mandate of the people, and the Green Party may have life in the upcoming elections. Hillary is now regulated commentator status.
Click to expand...
not with Jill Stein. As much as I'd like to see a viable 3rd party,it's not happening...

PS..
What is going on with the re-counts! ( like it matters)
 
Taichiliberal said:
It is my suspicion that the Green Party's recount is 3 fold:

1. To demonstrate that there are gross flaws in the system - inherent or purposeful.

2. To show that the Green Party has more support than previously touted.

3. To show the American public that it is necessary to vote in the up-coming Congressional elections and challenge all discrepancy.
Click to expand...

biglaugh7_zpsd701e485.gif
 
Taichiliberal said:
I understand that once again a right wing wonk has managed to distort an action to fit the "git Obama" that the GOP has been wailing since the inauguration in 2008. You have no basis in reality for your "math" other than your personal opinion, supposition and conjecture.

The recounts are to show that the electoral votes in the states questioned either reflect the popular vote or not, as well as concluding just how bad Trump lost the popular vote. So far, it's the latter.
Click to expand...

so you acknowledge it will in no way effect the fact that Trump will be inaugurated come January......
 
anatta said:
not with Jill Stein. As much as I'd like to see a viable 3rd party,it's not happening...

PS..
What is going on with the re-counts! ( like it matters)
Click to expand...

Oh it's happening....it's just not getting the MSM focus...but it's happening on a small and steady pace via local elections. And given the amount of BS regarding our electoral system and criminal practices by the GOP to suppress the vote...it may happen sooner than we think.

The recounts are pretty much dead....but what they did achieve is as I've previously stated.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Oh it's happening....it's just not getting the MSM focus...but it's happening on a small and steady pace via local elections. And given the amount of BS regarding our electoral system and criminal practices by the GOP to suppress the vote...it may happen sooner than we think.

The recounts are pretty much dead....but what they did achieve is as I've previously stated.
Click to expand...

If by "achieve" you meant showing that the liberals are just a bunch of whiny, crybabies; then you would be correct. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top