real racism

ONLY and ALL are the two tests of a strict categorization method, but the use of either indicates an attempt to categorize. For instance, if ONLY the failing white kids are held back due to poor grades, but not ALL of the white kids are held back, while ALL of the black kids pass, regardless of performance, then obviously there is discrimination based on race. Sure, there may be a secondary method of discrimination, failing grades, in deciding what white kids to hold back, but that does not erase the race discrimination. The grades are obviously secondary since they were not applied to the black kids.

I am sure you will now claim that this actually happens or some bullshit.

What the blithering fuck are you talking about?

If what you say is true, that they did a white average and a black average on a given test, compared them, and then sent the racial group with the lowest average (black kids)to the lunch buch, then ALL black kids would be in the lunch bunch, according to your logic.

were all blacks in the lunch bunch?
 
What the blithering fuck are you talking about?

If what you say is true, that they did a white average and a black average on a given test, compared them, and then sent the racial group with the lowest average (black kids)to the lunch buch, then ALL black kids would be in the lunch bunch, according to your logic.

were all blacks in the lunch bunch?

Let's see:
1-A
1-B
1-C
2-D
1-F
Using an "average", they all are below a C and therefore need help; as a GROUP.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top