White nationalist, actually.
Rasmussen Reports - Black Likely Voters
- Thread starter Stretch
- Start date
White nationalist, actually.
Did a pollster tell you that?
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Saying people of any race can be a cuck is racism?
False. 538 has been remarkably accurate in every election. I believe they called every state correctly in 2008, and missed only one in 2012. Odds are odds. They are not predictions. Just because you don't understand statistics and probabilities, it doesn't mean they don't exist. When a batter gets a hit, it doesn't mean the odds of him getting that hit were wrong.
Multiple pollsters using mathematical probabilities. So I believe them over a guy who can't even craft a clever personal insult, much less a cogent argument against polling. If you need help, I'm talking about you.
Trumps support among blacks has been in the 10-20% range. Because of the smaller sample sizes in most polls, specific demographics have a much larger margin of error. It is what it is. Trump is losing this election badly. Early voting is converting preference to actual votes. You should start mentally preparing yourself. Or not. Take your pick.
L.A. Times
Moody’s Analytics
Princeton
FiveThirtyEight
Fox News
Associated Press
New York Times
Darth Omar
Russian asset
L.A. Times
Moody’s Analytics
Princeton
FiveThirtyEight
Fox News
Associated Press
New York Times
I prepared myself mentally in 2016 and was pleasantly surprised lol.
That won’t happen again in...3...2...1.
No more or less than most other polling services
Right, Trump is going to get forty six percent of the black vote, I wouldn't hang my hat on that one
"copy and paste" is incorrect, as I showed him before, the election in 2016 was projected as a close race, as this one will be, it was within the a margin of error (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html)
If you are feeling anxious about it, don't, it can either way and there is nothing you can do about it
They cannot seem to explain why the pollsters that failed in 2016 are suddenly supposedly peerless paragons of political prognostication, lol.
It was?
L.A. Times
Moody’s Analytics
Princeton
FiveThirtyEight
Fox News
Associated Press
New York Times
As I just showed "DO," as I have shown you on several occasions previously, you are wrong regarding the 2016 election, it was projected to be a close race (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html), within the margin of error, but I understand, the right just loves to play the martyr game, the victim, seems to be in their DNA
I also don't wear hats and I have never put any confidence in any poll, as is found on gambling slips, they "are for recreational use only"
These projections don't look "close" to me, Anchovies.
L.A. Times
Moody’s Analytics
Princeton
FiveThirtyEight
Fox News
Associated Press
New York Times
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Prepared to lose and hoping to win.
If we go down I’ll spend the next four years handing out I told ya so’s. I’ll have fun either way.
Yup, thanks for archiving my past posts, what I was doing there was showing what the favorability polls showed, and I was correct on how that influenced the 2018 election
Got anything else
I don't prepare or hope in either direction, it is what it is, I have been saying for months now that it will be a close election so there is no sense getting worked up in either case