Racial Bias in Black Panther Case

Cypress said:
You presume a crime was committed.

I don't.

I have an excellent bullshit detector, and I don't get easily duped by Iraq War Lies, Climate Gate Lies, or Fox News infotaintment articles.


The dude is now a private lawyer blogging for "pajamasmedia". HaHa! That automatically tells me he's an obama hater. And dude, I don't believe 90% of what I see on Fox News. The Justice Dept. dismissised this case as having no merit. The charges remain nothing more than allegations.

The whole "black panthers" angle is hilarious, and is a total red flag. If you want to frighten white people, that whole black panther imagery is a sure fire bet to get some adult depends undergarmetns soiled.

So I have a choice of believing some obama hater who is now blogging on one of the most rightwing extremist blogs out there.

Or I can believe the DOJ.


Like I said, my bullshit meter is excellent. I don't fall for scary and phony stories of scared, downtrodden white people. I didn't fall for the climate gate bullshit. I sat back patiently and waited for it to blow up in the faces of rightwing dupes.
Click to expand...

and if someone put up the KKK....which does the same thing....you would shit yourself
 
I sat back patiently and waited for it to blow up in the faces of rightwing dupes.

LOL

Yeah, the several whitewash inquiries have really made a stronger case for CAGW

(catastrophic anthropogenic global warming)

Cypress doesn't fall for hype? LOL
 
Caboose said:
All of which does not discount, nor discuss, that which I have said. If you want people to be treated equal, treat all racism the same.
Click to expand...


Department of Justice, Hate Crimes Statistics:

• 72.6 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
• 17.3 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
• 5.5 percent were a result of bias against groups of individuals consisting of more than one race (anti-multiple races, group).
• 3.4 percent resulted from anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
• 1.3 percent were motivated by anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2008/victims.html
Click to expand...


Surprisingly, I rely on data and empirical facts more than message board pontifications.


These are the hate crime statistics reported by Dept. of Justice.

To the empirically minded, the first thing that jumps out is how amazingly representative and consistent the hate crime investigations are in proportion to national demographics.
‘
To put it simply, that data show that hate crimes are investigated in almost the exact proportion to what one would expect based on the demographic break downs in this country.

According to these stats, DOJ is extremely diligent and fair in the application of hate crimes investigations. White people are the overwhelming majority in this country. It’s a statistical and demographic fact that the majority of hate crimes are going to be overwhelmingly white criminals against minority victims. But the actual statistical breakdown of investigations is amazingly fair and impartial, based on what one would expect based on demographic breakdown of the nation. It’s almost too fair; it actually kinda astonishing. It’s like DOJ is investigating hate crimes in the exact proportions one would expect based on demographical distribution.


Simply put, all the blather about hate crimes against whites not being investigated in a fair and impartial way is completely debunked by these statistics.
 
Cypress said:
Surprisingly, I rely on data and empirical facts more than message board pontifications.


These are the hate crime statistics reported by Dept. of Justice.

To the empirically minded, the first thing that jumps out is how amazingly representative and consistent the hate crime investigations are in proportion to national demographics.
‘
To put it simply, that data show that hate crimes are investigated in almost the exact proportion to what one would expect based on the demographic break downs in this country.

According to these stats, DOJ is extremely diligent and fair in the application of hate crimes investigations. White people are the overwhelming majority in this country. It’s a statistical and demographic fact that the majority of hate crimes are going to be overwhelmingly white criminals against minority victims. But the actual statistical breakdown of investigations is amazingly fair and impartial, based on what one would expect based on demographic breakdown of the nation. It’s almost too fair; it actually kinda astonishing. It’s like DOJ is investigating hate crimes in the exact proportions one would expect based on demographical distribution.


Simply put, all the blather about hate crimes against whites not being investigated in a fair and impartial way is completely debunked by these statistics.
Click to expand...

i feel sorry you....sometimes....tonight is one of those times....

"hate" crimes....think about it...how many black on white or any other race violence gets labeled HATE crime? not much....that is a fact....

your stats prove nothing.....as usual
 
Cypress said:
Surprisingly, I rely on data and empirical facts more than message board pontifications.


These are the hate crime statistics reported by Dept. of Justice.

To the empirically minded, the first thing that jumps out is how amazingly representative and consistent the hate crime investigations are in proportion to national demographics.
‘
To put it simply, that data show that hate crimes are investigated in almost the exact proportion to what one would expect based on the demographic break downs in this country.

According to these stats, DOJ is extremely diligent and fair in the application of hate crimes investigations. White people are the overwhelming majority in this country. It’s a statistical and demographic fact that the majority of hate crimes are going to be overwhelmingly white criminals against minority victims. But the actual statistical breakdown of investigations is amazingly fair and impartial, based on what one would expect based on demographic breakdown of the nation. It’s almost too fair; it actually kinda astonishing. It’s like DOJ is investigating hate crimes in the exact proportions one would expect based on demographical distribution.


Simply put, all the blather about hate crimes against whites not being investigated in a fair and impartial way is completely debunked by these statistics.
Click to expand...

Suicide.png
 
Yurt said:
i feel sorry you....sometimes....tonight is one of those times....

"hate" crimes....think about it...how many black on white or any other race violence gets labeled HATE crime? not much....that is a fact....

your stats prove nothing.....as usual
Click to expand...
It doesn't make it better if those get labeled "hate crimes" too.
 
Cypress said:
You presume a crime was committed.

I don't.

I have an excellent bullshit detector, and I don't get easily duped by Iraq War Lies, Climate Gate Lies, or Fox News infotaintment articles.


The dude is now a private lawyer blogging for "pajamasmedia". HaHa! That automatically tells me he's an obama hater. And dude, I don't believe 90% of what I see on Fox News. The Justice Dept. dismissised this case as having no merit. The charges remain nothing more than allegations.

The whole "black panthers" angle is hilarious, and is a total red flag. If you want to frighten white people, that whole black panther imagery is a sure fire bet to get some adult depends undergarmetns soiled.

So I have a choice of believing some obama hater who is now blogging on one of the most rightwing extremist blogs out there.

Or I can believe the DOJ.


Like I said, my bullshit meter is excellent. I don't fall for scary and phony stories of scared, downtrodden white people. I didn't fall for the climate gate bullshit. I sat back patiently and waited for it to blow up in the faces of rightwing dupes.
Click to expand...

Now here's where SuperFreak will jump in and claim this Rightie's third hand hearsay is much more reliable than the DOJ and you're just a hater because the guy went to work for pajamasmedia.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Now here's where SuperFreak will jump in and claim this Rightie's third hand hearsay is much more reliable than the DOJ and you're just a hater because the guy went to work for pajamasmedia.
Click to expand...

you morons crack me up.... that 'rightie' is simply a label that you use to try and discredit the former DOJ employee. This is standard operating procedure with idiots like you and Cypress. You proclaim someone is a rightie or you attack the name of the website.

It is quite pathetic.

That said, I do recall seeing the video of the guy at the time of the elections, but do not recall him acting violent (though the fact he was carrying a nightstick could be construed as intimidating).

THAT said.... here is the same guy....

 
Yurt said:
i feel sorry you....sometimes....tonight is one of those times....

"hate" crimes....think about it...how many black on white or any other race violence gets labeled HATE crime? not much....that is a fact....

your stats prove nothing.....as usual
Click to expand...

Well...his stats do prove you won't listen, no matter how much empirical evidence they may place right under your nose, if that evidence doesn't come from a conservative approved source..
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Well...his stats do prove you won't listen, no matter how much empirical evidence they may place right under your nose, if that evidence doesn't come from a conservative approved source..
Click to expand...

more lies....yawn

fact is, the stats in this study prove nothing, i've already explained it, as has asshat and tinfoil...only far left kooks like you continue to sip the cool aid
 
Superfreak said:
you morons crack me up.... that 'rightie' is simply a label that you use to try and discredit the former DOJ employee. This is standard operating procedure with idiots like you and Cypress. You proclaim someone is a rightie or you attack the name of the website.

It is quite pathetic.

That said, I do recall seeing the video of the guy at the time of the elections, but do not recall him acting violent (though the fact he was carrying a nightstick could be construed as intimidating).

THAT said.... here is the same guy....

YouTube- The Obama Administration Protected Black Panther Who Advocates Killing White Babies
Click to expand...

I just love it when you demonstrate that Zappa will eat anything!

Every time he opens his fat mouth, he swallows his fat head, but I say let him keep on defending this POS and the President that protects him.

He'd probably shriek at the top of his lungs in abject outrage if this "thing" mouthed off in a crowd like that with his wife and kid in tow.
 
NigelTufnel said:
Once again, if Yurt and his fellow travelers were as concerned with real actual racism instead of bullshit racism against white people, maybe the republican party would receive more than a laughable percentage of minority voters.
Click to expand...

lmao.... so unbelievably pathetic of you. To pretend that those who find this bad must somehow ignore 'real' racism??? weak attempt at a straw man.

Also... to pretend that 'real' racism does not include black on white is rather amusing.

I am certain this is perfectly acceptable to you....

 
Superfreak said:
lmao.... so unbelievably pathetic of you. To pretend that those who find this bad must somehow ignore 'real' racism??? weak attempt at a straw man.

Also... to pretend that 'real' racism does not include black on white is rather amusing.

I am certain this is perfectly acceptable to you....

YouTube- The Obama Administration Protected Black Panther Who Advocates Killing White Babies
Click to expand...


Nah, that's certainly racism. I was referring to the claim that racial bias governs decision-making at the DoJ which was the subject of the post that I quoted. Jackass.

And, again I see that the board Republicans are trolling the shallow end of the wingnutosphere.
 
Wasn't the recent Supreme Court ruling on guns based on a black dude in the hood in Chicago wanting to have a gun after his home had been broken into several times and the City told him he still couldn't?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top