race riots after zimmerman acquittal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's really a vote up or down on freewheeling vigilantes in fl!
I mean fuck the cops etc. lets kill some suspicious people right
 
I've been right about everything. I called this as media bullshit from the beginning, the media lied about trayvons appearance, using a picture of him when he was 12. You guys got fooled about the spliced audio that got the NBC producer fired. You guys kept saying "oh he has no injuries, look at the camera in the police station... no blood!" Then it was shown he was bleeding all over, so you mitigated that by saying it wasn't that bad. You were likely wrong about who started the fight (THE FIGHT), with witnesses corroborating zimmerman being beaten the shit out of. You guys overcharged him because of politics and because you didn't want egg on your faces. Now you've staked out your positions unflinchingly.

Last year I saw idiot after idiot acting as if they knew any of the facts of the case, while being wrong time and time again. They said it with absolute conviction. now that I do it, everyone fucking hates it (and I made actual threads about me doing this on purpose, so I am not saying this retroactively... go look them up). The silver lining though as after getting brute forced by me all the false fact speculators started dying down. Maybe this will teach you idiots in the future to actually let the facts come out before jumping to conclusions.



I love this move the goal posts line. As if charging someone when you cannot meet the burden is appropriate. Now you can say "oh I dont even care he is not guilty I just wanted him to go to court." You basically say this to protect your ego from being wrong...
LOL Projection is not just a room in the theater Grind. You've biased your self. You don't care that the Police and DA let Zimmerman walked based on the "Stand your ground" statute when they have no place to do so. According to the law of Florida only a magistrate can do that. So they let a man walk walk who just took a human life and you're claiming him innocent when you don't, nor couldn't know all the facts and you're claiming you care about justice? Right Grind! Right! I can see you have a future in sales.

Try selling that to someone else. You've biased your self, you haven't even stopped to even ask why Zimmerman didn't go before a magistrate to apply for a "Stand your ground exemption." have you? So the facts are, you have made up your mind, you don't care what they may be and you're ok with the prospect that Zimmerman should not face justice as he now is and you're trying to tell us you care about justice.

Right, sure! Not buying it dude.
 
No, that's not the main issue, that might be an issue for you, but believe it or not, self defense is a valid defense, whether you like it or not. And stand your ground is a real law, whether you like it or not. And sometimes, when people commit justifiable homicide they are not charged with a crime, because there is no crime, or because the state knows it can't meet its burden, which is what they are now finding out. You dont charge everyone with a crime that shoots someone else.
Yes Grind, that is the issue. That's why millions of people were outraged. You're argument is childish. Certainly self defense is a valid defense. In Florida so is "Stand your ground' but it isn't the police or DA's place to let a person who just took another human beings life walk scott free with no consequences because they have a valid defense. Having a valid defense does not mean that one is either guilty or innocent and it's painfully obvious that YOU JUST DON'T GET THAT! LOL
 
You were there? You know this for a fact, seems to me the evidence is still kind of sketchy on this. Different accounts by different witnesses, so, at this point, I am still not sure who was the aggressor, but you must have additional information that I have not heard.
LOL and then he has to the balls to say we're biased and he's not. I'll give Grind this. He's got balls! LOL
 
You know, I have not changed my attitude, nor the things that I have said about the zimmerman case, for over a year now, but I sure do notice a definitive increase in hostilities and ire directed at me. It seems the closer and closer we get to zimmermans inevitable acquittal, and the more we are seeing the prosecutions case fall apart like wet tissue paper with the States own witnesses backing up zimmerman, team trayvon is realizing how wrong they were --- and MAN DO THEY HATE IT. That's the only thing that explains the increased frustration. You know your facts aren't holding up and you know your reality of the events is collapsing. Maybe you have even had an honest moment with yourself and pondered . . . "hmm, maybe we did go too far, maybe I picked the wrong side this time . . ." It's gotta drive you insane, you guys really really really hate being wrong.

Be mad all you want, I'm sitting here smiling.
LOL You're confusing ire with humor. The majority of people havn't formed an opinion of Zimmermans guilt or innocence. They just wanted him to face justice and have the facts of the case ascertained in a court of law. You're the one proclaiming his innocence while also claiming you're not biased and then spazzing out when we laugh at you! :)
 
they basically are, they just waived the formal immunity hearing, probably not wanting to kill their really good defense at trial. The jury will be instructed that someone doesn't have a duty to retreat.
Bullshit....keep spinning. They decided to enter a self defense plea. Could that possibly be that Zimmermans council felt that the facts were not adequate for a Florida magistrate to grant a "Stand your ground" exemption? I mean why go to trial when you don't have to? LOL

Keep spinning Grind. :)
 
[Q

Au Contraire...I've been watching the shrillness of tone in your posts escalating every day since the trial's beginning and point after point of your hero's case gets shot down...

That's it...just keep ignoring the fact one of your hero's key witnesses RECANTED their testimony yesterday and stated they never saw Trayvon hit Zimmerman.

Yeah...you've been "right about everything"...ROTFLMAO!!

Pretty sure it happened Thursday.

A Zimmerman witness who had previously stated he saw Martin hitting Zimmerman admitted on the stand he never ACTUALLY SAW Martin hitting Zimmerman.

With all due respect, Zappa, this is what drives Grind up the wall. You state in one post it's a "fact", then thell me a few posts later
you're "pretty sure" it didn't happen "yesterday", but on "Thursday".

I live very near Sanford, and I can guarantee you that if anyone recanted their testimony, anytime, the news would be everywhere.
 
You don't care about justice. You are trolling on this topic or maybe you really are a douchebag.

Trayvon did not deserve to die. Zimmerman, at best, followed him and provoked some sort of defensive response.

The Zimmerman supporters seem to think Trayvon had no right to stand his ground. Since he was a scary black male he is expected to retreat.

Zimmerman's actions were stupid and he alone created a deadly situation. The "armed with a sidewalk" claim would be laughable if it were not intended to be serious. Zimmerman is at least guilty of manslaughter. If the jury is instructed to consider that charge, it's unlikely he will not go to prison.
OH Grind is definately trolling. :)
 
stop telling me what I care about. I know what I care about. Justice is zimmerman being free, and that makes me very happy. Justice is when the state can't meet their burden, you don't convict them, and if you have a particularly weak case, you don't charge them. I knew last year they couldn't meet their burden. how do you prove ill will hatred and spite in a case like this?



There is no evidence that trayvon was put in a situation to stand his ground. You dont have the right to take a swing at somebody if they are walking on a public walkway. Nothing zimmerman did, even if we were to agree that he followed trayvon, is illegal.
Well if that's true Grind why didn't he just apply for a "Stand your ground" exemption? Why go to a trial with it's risks? Keep spinning buddy, it's the most fun I've had on JPP since Dixie was banned. :)
 
And team trayvon keep talking about supposed's and what ifs, while not keeping in mind that the burden of proof is on them. If you are going to charge someone with a crime, you need to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Who cares? That's the prosecutions problem. Zimmerman is facing a jury of his peers for his actions in taking a human life. He will be judged based upon the facts of the case and either way, innocent or guilty, justice will have been served. I am pleased. :)
 
If you beat the shit out of them do they have the right to shoot you? and by the way, a broken nose and a few lacerations are to the back of the head is not having the shit beat out of you.
Well I don't know about that Rana.....I don't know if it's life threatening but if someone gives me a lump on my head and a broken nose I'd think I had the shit beat out of me but call me a pussy! ;)
 
Could Trayvon have used head banging on concrete when he realized Zimmerman was going for his gun? So many possibilities!

And we'll never know because Trayvon is dead.....

While if Z had just stayed in his car after reporting Trayvon and gone on home....

I'm pretty sure if I was walking down a sidewalk and realized someone was following me...and they kept following me... late at night... I might be tempted to swing first....
 
and again, IT'S NOT ILLEGAL TO FOLLOW SOMEONE. IT'S COMPLETELY IMMATERIAL TO THE CASE. THE ONLY THING THAT IS RELEVANT IS ZIMMERMANS STATE OF MIND WHEN HE PULLED THE TRIGGER.

If zimmerman believed he had a reasonable fear of great bodily injury (you know, like getting your head bashed in) he has a right to self defense, even if he follow trayvon, even if he asked trayvon what was up, even if he said "what the fuck are you doing here you asshole" even if he grabbed travyon but then made an effort to retreat.
So I can follow you on the street, approach you, confront you, and if in any way your actions make me feel threatened I have the right to kill you?

Anyone here care to ask what's wrong with this picture? LOL
 
tekkychick said:
I didn't see a news article in your initial post. I have turned off all signatures and pictures, so maybe I missed it. But I read something that seemed to be your opinion based on tweets you've seen.

if a lamestream media deigns to report on it, then you'll get to see it. until then, I don't feel like hearing all the BS source ignorance.

So as far as we know, this whole post is just you trying to stir up shit. Ok. Got it.
 
You just need to stop commenting if you not want people to debate your opinions. Like Billy always says, you can ignore them. :)
Grinds trying to be a poor mans Dixie but failing miserably at it. He has neither Dixies capacity for willful ignorance nor does he have Dixie's ability to rant (which I dearly miss). I will have to give him credit for trying. JPP is sadly lacking without Dixie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top