Question for JPP Climate Enthusiasts

[Darth Omar]

Nope. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

Have to agree with Moon on that.

The earth would be a very cold place without an atmosphere. It doesn’t ‘warm’ the planet any more than a blanket
‘warms’ you on a cold night—but the blanket does slow down the loss of your body heat.

Earth’s atmosphere does basically the same thing but that by no means validates global warming.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You need to convince me that you are not going to be a waste of time, and that you have legitimate training and expertise to even pontificate on this topic.

I do not have the time or inclination to waste on armchair expert poseurs.
Doing a ten minute google search and parroting, or even misrepresenting, a few things you read on a blog does not make you an expert.

Do you have a PhD in atmospheric science? what university is it from? And point me to your original research published in peer reviewed scientific journals.

Are you to busy cyber-stalking your next female victim??

Your proclamation means, of course, that you've now shown that you need to STFU and STFD about anything that you don't have a PHD in and that includes politics.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Nope. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

Should I believe a world renowned MIT atmospheric physics professor like Richard Lindzen or you? Now that's a tough one!! You wouldn't even be here to post that bullshit if water vapour wasn't a greenhouse gas.

 

[Truth Detector]

AND
When the earth doesn't end in 12 years, liberals will just say it's because of the changes that THEY were able to accomplish.

They will pretend to not remember them; here's a blast from the past:

By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil.”
–Kenneth Watt, an ecologist who also cautioned against global cooling and also said, “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” (Thank goodness that never happened.)

“…civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
–George Wald, Harvard biologist

“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
– Paul Ehrlich, April 1970 Mademoiselle magazine

“Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half…”
– January 1970 Life magazine

“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation.”
– Denis Hayes, chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I haven't heard anything yet from any democrat that is dumber than "Raking Forests", "Nuking Hurricanes", "Buying Greenland", "Look at my African American over here", "Cruze's father assassinated Kennedy", I always wanted a Purple Heart", I deserve the Medal Of Honor", "Mexicans Love me", "Me and Kim fell in love", "I'm smarter than any general", "If Ivanka weren't my daughter, I'd be dating her"................................

I could go on for days!

But that is enough Donald Trump stupid things he says for now!

You mean like:

The earth is going to end in 12 years or cow flatulence is adding to the earth's warming!!??

 

[Truth Detector]

By the way, anyone want to guess how much of the earths space is taken up by urban development?

3% of land surface is covered by urban areas. This is what makes the leftists arguments so stupid and lame.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

That's a worthy response.

.

 

[Truth Detector]

Have to agree with Moon on that.

The earth would be a very cold place without an atmosphere. It doesn’t ‘warm’ the planet any more than a blanket
‘warms’ you on a cold night—but the blanket does slow down the loss of your body heat.

Earth’s atmosphere does basically the same thing but that by no means validates global warming.

CO2 takes up an infinitesimal amount of the earth's atmosphere. Therefore, it is not CO2 that keeps the blanket around the earth.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Another profoundly stupid and lie filled statement. How old are you gas bag? Three?



I R O N Y!!!

Why even respond to his stupidity and denigrating comments?

Scroll past his insanity and assign him a place among those forgotten.

 

[Darth Omar]

CO2 takes up an infinitesimal amount of the earth's atmosphere. Therefore, it is not CO2 that keeps the blanket around the earth.

I think it’s mostly water vapor that’s responsible, actually lol.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Have to agree with Moon on that.

The earth would be a very cold place without an atmosphere. It doesn’t ‘warm’ the planet any more than a blanket
‘warms’ you on a cold night—but the blanket does slow down the loss of your body heat.

Earth’s atmosphere does basically the same thing but that by no means validates global warming.

33 degrees Celsius to be precise, this is textbook stuff. You don't need a Ph.D in atmospheric physics to know that.

 

[gfm7175]

What's that? Huh? Can't hear you. Tsk. lol

Today, 01:41 PM
Into the Night
Verified User

This message is hidden because Into the Night is on your ignore list.

Today, 01:46 PM
Into the Night
Verified User

This message is hidden because Into the Night is on your ignore list.

Oh no... You're "PUNISHING" a forum poster!!!!! OH BOY OH JOY!!!!!!!!!

 

[Jack]

By the way, anyone want to guess how much of the earths space is taken up by urban development?

3% of land surface is covered by urban areas. This is what makes the leftists arguments so stupid and lame.

When we are standing shoulder to shoulder here on the Home Planet, ... it will be too late.

 

[countryboy]

Well, I found a non-socialist ‘solution’ to climate change, compliments of Bernie:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1169677965527003139

You're right, mandatory abortion, ala China, is more of a communist thing.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I like eating red meat. It tastes good. It is a good source of protein.

Did you hear about the story of the vegan in Australia, who sued her neighbors over them BBQing in their backyard??

She lost the suit and now supposedly a large amount of people are planning on throwing a BBQ in front of her house.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

"China Plans To Build The World's First Solar Power Station In Space"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scotts...st-solar-power-station-in-space/#3eefde705c94

"China is planning to build the world's first solar power station in space to provide "inexhaustible clean energy" according to a story in Science and Technology Daily, the official newspaper of China's Ministry of Science and Technology.
Pang Zhihao, from the China Academy of Space Technology said that a space solar power system orbiting the Earth at an altitude of 36,000 kilometers could tap the energy of the sun's rays without disruption from atmospheric conditions or loss of sunlight at night.
They claim to be already testing the technology and intend to build the station by 2050."

.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

"Japan Wants To Put A Giant Solar Farm In Space"
https://www.iflscience.com/technology/japan-wants-put-giant-solar-farm-space/

"Picture this: a giant solar power plant floating in space, gathering the sun’s energy with virtually no constraints from the weather, seasons or time of day, delivering a constant supply of green energy to Earth. Sound a little too Sci-Fi? Well, thanks to JAXA, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, we could actually witness this incredible technology in just over a decade."

.

 

[countryboy]

There is nobody on this board with the expertise, training, and knowledge to answer that.

Playing armchair expert on an obscure message board is an exercise in both futility and self-conceit.

Anyone on an obscure message board who claims they have the solution to global warming needs to check their ego.

On the other hand, anyone who claims addressing global warming will result in a Soviet-style command and control "massive intrusion" into people lives is parroting what they heard on Fox Noise, and that type of sloganeering telegraphs their abject ignorance on the subject matter.

The experts are going to have to come up with solutions that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase carbon sequestration, and identify and implement adaptation strategies for our infrastructure, public works, and remaining healthy ecosystems.

It is going to cost money.

But the economics also have to factor in the cost of doing nothing. What is the cost to society, to our pocketbooks, and to the environment if we do nothing and continue to relentlessly spew billions of tons of heat-trapping GHGs into the atmosphere,year after year, decade after decade, with no thought of trying to limit it?

My judgment is that a "do nothing" strategy will cost your pocketbook and your quality of life far more in the long run, than spending money on mitigation and adaptation in the short run.

What does Fox have to do with Democrat Party members reciting the various planks of Communism at Commie Con?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

It's a massive pile of nonsense.

the official newspaper of China's Ministry of Science and Technology.

The earth proposed building an orbiting microwave generator, powered by the sun, in space; but the UN shot it down, by suggesting that it could be used as a weapon.

 

[Callinectes]

There is nobody on this board with the expertise, training, and knowledge to answer that.

Neither do a bunch of "progressive" jackass presidential hopefuls who are simply parroting things they have heard and are pandering to their base composed of pimply faced adolescents and old hippys

Playing armchair expert on an obscure message board is an exercise in both futility and self-conceit.

Same goes for a bunch of "progressive" jackass presidential hopefuls who are simply parroting things they have heard and are pandering to their base composed of pimply faced adolescents and old hippys

Anyone on an obscure message board who claims they have the solution to global warming needs to check their ego.

Same goes for a bunch of "progressive" jackass presidential hopefuls who are simply parroting things they have heard and are pandering to their base composed of pimply faced adolescents and old hippys

On the other hand, anyone who claims addressing global warming will result in a Soviet-style command and control "massive intrusion" into people lives is parroting what they heard on Fox Noise, and that type of sloganeering telegraphs their abject ignorance on the subject matter.

Don't even try it! We've heard straight from the horse's(jackass's)mouth Ban meat, ban air travel, ban nuclear, ban fossil, ban coal!

The experts are going to have to come up with solutions that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase carbon sequestration, and identify and implement adaptation strategies for our infrastructure, public works, and remaining healthy ecosystems.

This was something I thought the paris accords was supposed to do. There's still a butt load of countries signed onto that thing, what have they come up with?

It is going to cost money.

But, but, but...the national debt! The deficit!

But the economics also have to factor in the cost of doing nothing. What is the cost to society, to our pocketbooks, and to the environment if we do nothing and continue to relentlessly spew billions of tons of heat-trapping GHGs into the atmosphere,[/I]year after year, decade after decade, with no thought of trying to limit it?

I heard somewhere that at a cost of about 16 TRILLION DOLLARS,we might be able to lower the global temp by 1.5 degrees C by 2035. For 16 TRILLION DOLLARS, I better need an arctic parka and an engine block heater to run my truck, and I live in South Florida

My judgment is that a "do nothing" strategy will cost your pocketbook and your quality of life far more in the long run, than spending money on mitigation and adaptation in the short run.

You're on an "obscure message board", you don't have "the expertise, training, and knowledge" to make a judgement like that