There is nobody on this board with the expertise, training, and knowledge to answer that.
Playing armchair expert on an obscure message board is an exercise in both futility and self-conceit.
Anyone on an obscure message board who claims they have the solution to global warming needs to check their ego.
On the other hand, anyone who claims addressing global warming will result in a Soviet-style command and control "massive intrusion" into people lives is parroting what they heard on Fox Noise, and that type of sloganeering telegraphs their abject ignorance on the subject matter.
The experts are going to have to come up with solutions that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase carbon sequestration, and identify and implement adaptation strategies for our infrastructure, public works, and remaining healthy ecosystems.
It is going to cost money.
But the economics also have to factor in the cost of doing nothing. What is the cost to society, to our pocketbooks, and to the environment if we do nothing and continue to relentlessly spew billions of tons of heat-trapping GHGs into the atmosphere,year after year, decade after decade, with no thought of trying to limit it?
My judgment is that a "do nothing" strategy will cost your pocketbook and your quality of life far more in the long run, than spending money on mitigation and adaptation in the short run.