Qpublicans Fall Flat On Day One Of Bogus Twitter Hearings
- Thread starter Althea
- Start date
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
As a quick example of what I mean:
If you flip that and make it about one of the Trump hearings or the Jan 6 committee...
If Democrats are going to spend 1/4 billion dollars on bogus investigations, we might as well get some entertainment value out of it. I cannot wait to see how this issue progresses.
See! It is the exact same stuff we all saw here coming from the Right about Democrat hearings on Trump and Jan 6. Not a scintilla of difference.
If you flip that and make it about one of the Trump hearings or the Jan 6 committee...
If Democrats are going to spend 1/4 billion dollars on bogus investigations, we might as well get some entertainment value out of it. I cannot wait to see how this issue progresses.
See! It is the exact same stuff we all saw here coming from the Right about Democrat hearings on Trump and Jan 6. Not a scintilla of difference.
Althea
Althea told me...
Only for you. For all of your intelligence IRL, you love to pretend that you are a moron on this board.
trump is a Russian operative, who nearly brought down the entire country. Everything that Mueller found...despite unprecedented obstruction by all of the co conspirators, was true and accurate.
The Jan. 6 committee unearthed reams of evidence that showed the extent that trump and MAGApublicans went in order to plot a terrorist attack on the American public.
Althea
Althea told me...
Except there is no intelligent argument against the validity of the Jan. 6 commission.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
You are just proving my point.
So, we've let the democrats lie all day - as democrats do.
The fun exchange in the hearings today was this;
{“Well, let me refresh your memory,” began Boebert. “On March 12, 2021, Mr. Roth, I know you looked at it because fascist Twitter 1.0 had a public interest exceptions policy which means for members of Congress to be shadowbanned, it had to go before you, Mr. Roth. So I’ll ask again: Did you shadow-ban my account? Yes or no?”
Roth made a second denial, but the cat was out of the bag thanks to Elon Musk’s staff. She had the information that they had indeed silenced her and over a simple joke she’d made about Hillary Clinton being angry she couldn’t rig her election. Roth’s response, according to the information provided to Boebert, was to place a 90-day filter on her account so she couldn’t be found in searches and prevented notification for non-followers.
“This is considered an aggressive visibility filter,” said Boebert. “You silenced members of congress from communicating with their constituents. You silenced me from communicating with the American people over a freaking joke.”
“Who the hell do you think you are?” she asked.
Boebert continued to lay into the former execs by noting that what they did was indeed election interference. This includes suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story, a member of Congress, and the banning of a U.S. President.
Boebert noted that they thought they were safe under Section 230, but she reminded them that this protection was for publishers, not editors and that the former staff of Twitter was acting as editors.}
https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/...-former-twitter-execs-over-censorship-n701585
The fun exchange in the hearings today was this;
{“Well, let me refresh your memory,” began Boebert. “On March 12, 2021, Mr. Roth, I know you looked at it because fascist Twitter 1.0 had a public interest exceptions policy which means for members of Congress to be shadowbanned, it had to go before you, Mr. Roth. So I’ll ask again: Did you shadow-ban my account? Yes or no?”
Roth made a second denial, but the cat was out of the bag thanks to Elon Musk’s staff. She had the information that they had indeed silenced her and over a simple joke she’d made about Hillary Clinton being angry she couldn’t rig her election. Roth’s response, according to the information provided to Boebert, was to place a 90-day filter on her account so she couldn’t be found in searches and prevented notification for non-followers.
“This is considered an aggressive visibility filter,” said Boebert. “You silenced members of congress from communicating with their constituents. You silenced me from communicating with the American people over a freaking joke.”
“Who the hell do you think you are?” she asked.
Boebert continued to lay into the former execs by noting that what they did was indeed election interference. This includes suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story, a member of Congress, and the banning of a U.S. President.
Boebert noted that they thought they were safe under Section 230, but she reminded them that this protection was for publishers, not editors and that the former staff of Twitter was acting as editors.}
https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/...-former-twitter-execs-over-censorship-n701585
Althea
Althea told me...
You don't have a point. You rely on feelings. If you don't think that Jan. 6 was a problem, then I don't know how I can help you here.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I think Jan 6 was a three-ish hour riot that the Democrats turned into political hay. I have a problem with them then, in a single-party manner trying to turn it into a mechanism to destroy their political opponents.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Sure there is. There are in fact many of them.
Althea
Althea told me...
LOL. Then we have nothing to discuss. You look foolish in this thread.
Althea
Althea told me...
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Let me start with this one. Did the Jan 6 committee suppress, avoid reviewing, not call for or subpoena, evidence, witnesses, or other materials that would have hurt their case against Trump? Simple yes or no question.
Althea
Althea told me...
Well Gym Jordan, if you have any evidence we will all be thrilled to see it.
Did anyone involved in the Jan. 6 terrorist attack, or anyone with knowledge of same, refuse to testify before the Jan. 6 committee?
Extra credit:
Why did they refuse?