PWN of the century

Southern Man said:
Its rather obvious, isn't it? If a male is attracted to a male and acts on it, he's gay.
Click to expand...

He's not attracted to a "male" (a man), he's attracted to a child.
This does not fall under the definition of Homsexuality, even though there have been many that have tried to try and make this connection.
Pedophiles prey on CHILDREN, not ADULTS, and when a CHILD reaches ADULTHOOD, the peophile is no longer interested.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
He's not attracted to a "male" (a man), he's attracted to a child.
This does not fall under the definition of Homsexuality, even though there have been many that have tried to try and make this connection.
Pedophiles prey on CHILDREN, not ADULTS, and when a CHILD reaches ADULTHOOD, the peophile is no longer interested.
Click to expand...
Your assertion assumes that the perpetrator can't tell the difference between a male child and a female child?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I've already addressed that part, in one of my previoius comments.
Do I really need to reiterate myself, in each and every reply??
Click to expand...
You haven't addressed the specific point that I made; its a simple question. Again: Your assertion assumes that the perpetrator can't tell the difference between a male child and a female child? Correct or not?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
He's not attracted to a "male" (a man), he's attracted to a child.
This does not fall under the definition of Homsexuality, even though there have been many that have tried to try and make this connection.
Pedophiles prey on CHILDREN, not ADULTS, and when a CHILD reaches ADULTHOOD, the peophile is no longer interested.
Click to expand...

This is a stretch at best, Of course the pedophile must know there is a difference between female and male's, that would make a male pedophile going after a male child a gay pedophile, unless of course you go back to what I said before, that the pedophiles are now saying it is a sickness, they just need to be with a child, they were born that way, easy solution, execute them
 
froggie said:
I usually don't read your post, garbage in, garbage out...
Click to expand...

Wan't addressed to you anyway, so it doesn't matter if you read it or not.

You've already proven that no matter what goes into your brain, it comes out as garbage; which you then trasfer to a post, via your keyboard.
 
Southern Man said:
You haven't addressed the specific point that I made; its a simple question. Again: Your assertion assumes that the perpetrator can't tell the difference between a male child and a female child? Correct or not?
Click to expand...

No, my assertion makes no such assumption.
I"ve already said that anyone that desires to have sex with a child, is a pedophile.
It's the same whether the pedophiles obssession is with boys or girls.
 
Jeff said:
This is a stretch at best, Of course the pedophile must know there is a difference between female and male's, that would make a male pedophile going after a male child a gay pedophile, unless of course you go back to what I said before, that the pedophiles are now saying it is a sickness, they just need to be with a child, they were born that way, easy solution, execute them
Click to expand...
Peds desperately want us to believe they are mentally ill. Do you know what inmates do to pedophiles in prison?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
No, my assertion makes no such assumption.
I"ve already said that anyone that desires to have sex with a child, is a pedophile.
It's the same whether the pedophiles obssession is with boys or girls.
Click to expand...
That doesn't make any sense. Its like saying that a heterosexual rapist doesn't care if his 18 year old victim is a man or a woman.
 
Southern Man said:
Peds desperately want us to believe they are mentally ill. Do you know what inmates do to pedophiles in prison?
Click to expand...

Exactly what ought to be done to them, And yes they are mentally ill, so strap them to a gurney and tell them they are going on a ride at Disney world, hell they will croak with a smile on there face!
 
Southern Man said:
That doesn't make any sense. Its like saying that a heterosexual rapist doesn't care if his 18 year old victim is a man or a woman.
Click to expand...

Do you have anything to support that a HETROSEXUAL RAPIST doesn't care if his victim is a man or a woman.
Now, a BI-SEXUAL RAPIST may not care.
 
Southern Man said:
Its rather obvious, isn't it? If a male is attracted to a male and acts on it, he's gay.
Click to expand...
Yea, I know exactly what you mean. I was banging some twink the other day and he was moaning and groaning and carrying on and then he looked back at me and said "Give me a reach around". I was thinking "God, what a fag!"
 
Southern Man said:
Just items 1 and 2, which you agreed to here:
Click to expand...

Then you're going to have to explain your logic; because I distinctly stated that:
1. Hetrosexual men desire to be with Hetrosexual women.
2. Hetrosexual women desire to be with Hetrosexual men.

This can only mean that when you're referring to "rapists", then a Hetrosexual male rapist would make women their victims and the opposite is also true.

Can you explain what you're driving at??
 
Southern Man said:
That doesn't make any sense. Its like saying that a heterosexual rapist doesn't care if his 18 year old victim is a man or a woman.
Click to expand...
This is a stupid argument. Froggie is right. A monster is a monster. Rape is not a sexual act it is an act of violation and violence. What fucking possible difference does it make to the victim if the perpetrator is gay or straight? This is like debating about getting beat over the head with a baseball bat by a right handed or left handed batter. It dont' make a hell of a lot of difference to whomever is getting their head bashed in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top