Putin offers to settle this

anatta said:
you are off tangent. but i'll be your huckleberry.

Do you think it's not normative for the 2nd largest military to control it's own Asian landmass?
( and you are forgetting China)

The checks and balances are for high crimes and misdemeanors.
That obviously lets the entire Russian thing out ( since there is no collusion.)

The memo could do it,but by it's self it's not coercive language.

Now go ye forth and froth with the rest of the resistance and continue undermining a legitimate POTUS.
Which was your goal from the start.. Which Putin called you out on.
Click to expand...

The only thing worth commenting about is the last sentence or two. Putin didn't call me out on that, I said it and have said it all along. Trump is incompetent and a guaranteed shipwreck. The sooner that clown is gone is the safer, more stable and best path.

Never ever trump. Putin outed me for that? Sorry, bt if he would like to harmonize that tune with me, I have no issue.

Trump must go.
 
It's all pretty dang embarrassing that other countries like Great Britain and Russia have to offer sage advice and opinions to the U.S. regarding how an elected leader of a country can talk about whatever he dang well wants to talk about regardless of what the info-leaking, twisted, lying, demented, vengeful, lying dems and their new boss (the media) dictate and invent as they go about attempting to destroy the greatest nation on earth. They're laughing their collective butts off at childish moronic snowflake left.

And, to think that traitor OBAMA actually TOLD Comey to make sure Hillary did not get indicted! The hypocrisy is nauseating. Where's Comey's famous 'note to self' memo on THAT???

trumpwon.jpg
 
anatta said:
retarded analysis..i sai d legalexcept for any unknown statue
Click to expand...

No, flawless logic, on point and you sidestepped it. Just admit you are wrong. Grow a set. Last I checked extortion and obstruction of justice and treason were illegal.
Trump can't do whatever the fuck he wants, and this de facto declassification is a loophole fraught with peril. Arnold could drive his Hummer through it and Trump damn sure could drive the ship of state into the rocks with it.
If it's a loophole, it needs closing. Declassification of code level state secrets are not trivial and should not be governed solely by the extent to which our Tourettes inflicted moron in chief manages to zip it on any given day..
 
Scarborough: Obama has ‘rigged’ FBI’s Clinton probe


MSNBC host Joe Scarborough says President Obama is unfairly influencing the FBI’s investigation of Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

“[Obama] said he wasn’t going to talk to the attorney general about the pending investigation, but he just did,” Scarborough said on Monday's broadcast of “Morning Joe." "Talk about a rigged process.”


story & video continued at........................
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...arborough-obama-has-rigged-fbis-clinton-probe
 
05439349870e580f0e0138fdd83ac9308e3502-v5.jpg
 
Micawber said:
No, flawless logic, on point and you sidestepped it. Just admit you are wrong. Grow a set. Last I checked extortion and obstruction of justice and treason were illegal.
Trump can't do whatever the fuck he wants, and this de facto declassification is a loophole fraught with peril. Arnold could drive his Hummer through it and Trump damn sure could drive the ship of state into the rocks with it.
If it's a loophole, it needs closing. Declassification of code level state secrets are not trivial and should not be governed solely by the extent to which our Tourettes inflicted moron in chief manages to zip it on any given day..
Click to expand...
in terms of declassification protocol, he can do so at will.
It's not a loophole you moron it's a function of being head of the executive branch.

Congress can change declassification protocol -but POTUS also has power of Commander in Chief,
so if it went to SCOTUS- separation of powers would keep that in his purview..

The rest of your rant is colorful, but not germane.
It's straight logic. There is no "treason". It's an executive making a decision to fight terrorism
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top