Hvilleherb is an idiot and the vast majority of his “news” sources are conspiracy/propaganda sites. You can spout your logical fallacy bullshit all day, but it doesn’t change the facts. Merely more diversionary feces from you morons.
Put Up or Shut Up Time for Mueller
- Thread starter hvilleherb
- Start date
Hvilleherb is an idiot and the vast majority of his “news” sources are conspiracy/propaganda sites. You can spout your logical fallacy bullshit all day, but it doesn’t change the facts. Merely more diversionary feces from you morons.
Can you refute the report, or not?
I'll understand if you can't, of course, DEMOCRAT.
Loser.
Can you refute the report, or not?
I'll understand if you can't, of course, DEMOCRAT.
Loser.
Easy. Is Mueller folding shop right now? Nope. So he’s neither “putting up or shutting up”, is he, dullard?
So, I guess your senile drunkard is just throwing bullshit and the RW fake news, as you, are eating it up.
Pitiable fools.
You didn't read what Giuliani said, did you, DEMOCRAT?
Giuliani said it is "put up or shut up" time for special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's 2016 election meddling and potential Trump campaign coordination. "They indicted a bunch of Russians who will never come to the United States, which is what we used to call sort of a 'showboat indictment' when I was a U.S. attorney," former New York City Mayor Giuliani told "The Cats Roundtable" on 970 AM-N.Y. "So, I am challenging them: It's time to put up or shut up. It's time for them to submit a report. "They can do it to the Justice Department. They should allow us to read it, as they promised. "If I'm wrong, I'll apologize, but I know I am not wrong. They don't have, as we would say in New York, a damn thing."
Giuliani reiterated to host John Catsimatidis "collusion is not a crime" and Mueller has been hunting to try to tie President Trump's campaign to a "conspiracy to hack" the DEMOCRAT National Committee's emails. "It should have been wrapped up probably in May or June – that's when they figured out they had no evidence of collusion, no evidence of conspiracy to hack," Giuliani told Catsimatidis. "Collusion is not a crime, by the way. I don't know why they're investigating it by the way. It's not even a crime.
"You have to show a conspiracy to hack. They don't have any evidence of that, which is the reason they don't submit a report, because they are embarrassed." More than embarrassment of having spent more than a reported $20 million of American taxpayer dollars, Mueller and those tied to the investigation might be on the hook for some criminal liability. "Mueller lost the Strzok and Page texts. The Justice Department said it was a clerical error," Giuliani told Catsimatidis. "If you or I were under investigation and our records disappeared by a clerical error, you'd have to come visit me in jail. What they get away with his outrageous. They go after people on little technicalities. This is a big technicality. And it happens to be a very relevant period. They have wiped out all of the texts when Strzok said he was going to prevent Trump from being president or get him removed, and Page, his girlfriend, when they were working for Mueller. I think they should be investigated for that. There is a double standard for how those from the Obama administration and the incoming Trump administration have been treated by the Justice Department. It seems to me that they all have immunity. If they are on Hillary's side or they are DEMOCRATS, they don't get pursued in the same way that Trumps people get pursued."
The Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's investigation FISA court warrant abuse is "doing a good job," but it will not come in time to help those entangled in the Mueller witch hunt, according to Giuliani. "We need these answers right now to show that this is illegitimate. He's doing a good job, by in large, but he's taking a long time to do it."
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rudygiuliani-specialcounsel-robertmueller/2018/12/30/id/896284/
He expressed an opinion, and you don't like it.
You can't refute a single thing he said, can you?
That's tough.
Loser.
Althea
Althea told me...
The precedent has been set by trump. Can you cite one other case where the candidate actually tried to cover up campaign finance law violations?
Althea
Althea told me...
Let's not forget that he was immediately pardoned by V.P.
Althea
Althea told me...
It's not impatience. It's fear. I keep referring the the last paragraphs of Poe's 'The Telltale Heart'.
They can hear that damned heart beating, and they're convinced that everyone else can too.
Yes...we can.
Groan
Getin the ring
Verified User
It's really rich how the "RW" is not throwing any news out there in regard, it's left wing media that is making all of this stuff up without a shred of evidence, we are just basically laughing at you on a daily basis.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Herb,
Giuliani is funny.
He's fooling himself by totally overstepping his bounds.
It is not his call to make when Mueller is done investigating.
Giuliani is funny.
He's fooling himself by totally overstepping his bounds.
It is not his call to make when Mueller is done investigating.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Yup, that would be Whitaker or whoever gets appointed AG lol.
Or do you think Mullet is a separate branch of government all to himself?
Getin the ring
Verified User
Mueller is embarrassing the institution, plain and simply put.
The "investigation" was supposed to be about Russian collusion, and so far it looks like a witch hunt gone mad.
He's frying small fish at what's suppose to be a grand feast
The "investigation" was supposed to be about Russian collusion, and so far it looks like a witch hunt gone mad.
He's frying small fish at what's suppose to be a grand feast
reagansghost
eternal
Getin the ring
Verified User
The only one that should be embarrassed is you making such a ridiculous claim that is easily refuted.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
There isn't a single mention of "collusion" in the letter authorizing Mueller.
So far, Mueller has investigated Russian interference as stated in the opening paragraph, with multiple indictments, and links between the Trump campaign and Russia as indicated in (b)1. and has convicted several people of lying about the interactions between the members of the Trump campaign and Russian individuals. I suggest you go read Comey's testimony referenced in the first paragraph. This wasn't only an investigation to find crimes but also a counterintelligence operation to discover how Russia interfered in the election.
Trump's campaign manager and Trump's National Security Advisor are hardly small fish. Russian nationals linked to Vladimer Putin are hardly small fish.
What you are doing is building a strawman argument that you think you can knock down. The FBI and Mueller are doing the job they were authorized to do. They are not restricted to investigating your fantasy and failure to succeed in your fantasy doesn't mean they aren't doing their job.
What was the content of the OP again, dullard?
The left is content to let the investigation run its course. In silence. With its confidentiality, which Mueller is protecting well.
It’s you RW cretins that keep screaming “witch hunt”.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Darth,
T'would be rather amusing if Whitaker called off the investigation.
And do you REALLY think that would be the end of it?
Not that it matters what you think.
You are obviously highly biased, as indicated by your refusal to give Mueller the respect of using his actual name.
And I presume you justify your slander by telling yourself: 'Well that's what the left does."
A few thoughts on that.
If you disparage 'the left,' then why on Earth would you use what 'the left' does as a benchmark for what is OK?
You clearly don't think what the left does is OK, but you tell yourself that if you emulate it, then that makes it OK for you to do the same thing.
And if someone on the left uses the same rationale (in reverse) to justify what they are doing, do you then agree that what you call 'the left' does is actually OK?
How can something which you disparage be OK in one respect, but not in another?
Aren't you make several mistakes here?
First of all you are disrespecting Mueller: Not OK.
Then you are stereotyping the entire left: Not OK.
And add to it, you are operating on the principle that two wrongs make a right. Not OK.
Your view is thus: Not OK.
T'would be rather amusing if Whitaker called off the investigation.
And do you REALLY think that would be the end of it?
Not that it matters what you think.
You are obviously highly biased, as indicated by your refusal to give Mueller the respect of using his actual name.
And I presume you justify your slander by telling yourself: 'Well that's what the left does."
A few thoughts on that.
If you disparage 'the left,' then why on Earth would you use what 'the left' does as a benchmark for what is OK?
You clearly don't think what the left does is OK, but you tell yourself that if you emulate it, then that makes it OK for you to do the same thing.
And if someone on the left uses the same rationale (in reverse) to justify what they are doing, do you then agree that what you call 'the left' does is actually OK?
How can something which you disparage be OK in one respect, but not in another?
Aren't you make several mistakes here?
First of all you are disrespecting Mueller: Not OK.
Then you are stereotyping the entire left: Not OK.
And add to it, you are operating on the principle that two wrongs make a right. Not OK.
Your view is thus: Not OK.
Last edited: