Provoking New Crimes Rather than Uncovering Past Crimes: Mueller's Modus Operandi

[Sailor]

This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



by Alan M. Dershowitz
November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi
Send
Print

Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi

 

[katzgar]

This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



by Alan M. Dershowitz
November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi
Send
Print

Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi

LOL

 

[Sailor]

LOL

Nothing funny about your inability to read. No matter what your inbred parents told you.

 

[reagansghost]

Dershowitz is a hoot, the kook that keeps on giving lol

 

[Sailor]

Dershowitz is a hoot, the kook that keeps on giving lol

What in the article do you disagree with?

 

[anonymoose]

Nothing funny about your inability to read. No matter what your inbred parents told you.

I think it is. But then I'm not the one who can't read. lol

 

[anonymoose]

This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



by Alan M. Dershowitz
November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi
Send
Print

Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi

This is why the senate would never convict trump even if he was impeached.

 

[dukkha]

In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

Mueller is a Democratic hit man..he's all about a political agenda -so what if there is no collusion?
as long as he can slime Trump, it's all he cares about like da resistance

 

[cancel2 2022]

What in the article do you disagree with?

You don't really expect him to answer, do you?

 

[cancel2 2022]

Dershowitz is a hoot, the kook that keeps on giving lol

Yeh, he's a top constitutional.lawyer, and you're what exactly???

 

[katzgar]

Nothing funny about your inability to read. No matter what your inbred parents told you.

LOL

 

[cancel2 2022]

LOL

Andy, you're just a geriatric twat, just shut the fuck up.

 

[Darth Omar]

This is an OP ED by Alan Dershowitz. One of the most unbiased Lawyers out there.



by Alan M. Dershowitz
November 30, 2018 at 5:00 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi
Send
Print

Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure.

Much more, well worth a read here: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13363/robert-mueller-modus-operandi

Dershowitz is right and wrong all at once.

By any legal metric, if Mullet fails to find collusion he’s a failure. However, The Resistance couldn’t be less interested in how the criminal justice system is perverted or how many otherwise law abiding people are thrown into prison simply for being accused of lying to investigators *about something that isn’t a crime*. All The Resistance cares about is impeaching Trump and making his supporters pay for the election of 2016.

Wittingly or unwittingly, Mullet is an arm of The Resistance. And I’m almost certain it’s wittingly. I have zero respect for anyone who would pervert the justice system for a political agenda—and destroy lives in the process. That’s a tad worse than Trump’s rhetoric on Twitter.

Furthermore, I have absolutely zero respect for anyone who condones it. Mullet is an abomination as are his supporters.

 

[Darth Omar]

This is why the senate would never convict trump even if he was impeached.

Might as well get ready for it.

The democrat controlled House will impeach Trump for—something lol. How can they not? I’d venture to guess at least 40% of democrat voters have at least some degree of TDS. Democrats in the House will face a rebellion if they don’t draw up articles of impeachment against Trump.

This could actually get interesting.

 

[kudzu]

What in the article do you disagree with?

Dersh has always been very biased..

 

[Darth Omar]

Dersh has always been very biased..

That’s not an argument lol.

 

[kudzu]

That’s not an argument lol.

I have read a lot of his stuff over the past 25 years.. He's an ardent Zionist and that colors everything for him.

 

[Darth Omar]

I have read a lot of his stuff over the past 25 years.. He's an ardent Zionist and that colors everything for him.

One can say the same about anti-Zionists.

Dershowitz is also a liberal/libertarian—talk about a dying breed.

 

[kudzu]

One can say the same about anti-Zionists.

Dershowitz is also a liberal/libertarian—talk about a dying breed.

Zionism has served it purpose and should have faded out of existence with OSLO.

 

[Darth Omar]

Zionism has served it purpose and should have faded out of existence with OSLO.

Hamas, and antisemitism more generally, should have faded out as well.

Be that as it may, are they any honest libertarians left in the ranks of the Democrat Party that are able to be critical of Mullet?

Besides Dershowitz?