Protester disrupts House over Obama's birthplace

Damocles said:
I think it was a rather good "PR Stunt" it clearly worked and ads next cycle will feature Democrats objecting to somebody reminding the Congress what the Constitution actually says.

It was simple, didn't take too danged much time, and writes campaign ads for the Republicans next cycle. And yes, if Rs objected to reading the Constitution it would be the same.
Click to expand...

Onclear just posted an article that shows some have already missed the boat! Ahahahahahaha, I think it is hilarious!
 
Rana said:
Onclear just posted an article that shows some have already missed the boat! Ahahahahahaha, I think it is hilarious!
Click to expand...
Actually he posted it a while ago. A couple of Rs didn't swear in properly, I saw it. Apparently they should have been there at the reading.
 
Damocles said:
Actually he posted it a while ago. A couple of Rs didn't swear in properly, I saw it. Apparently they should have been there at the reading.
Click to expand...


Who would've thought that being sworn in as a member of Congress couldn't be done by being administered the oath of office over TV?
 
Jarod said:
Show me a tape or clip of an elected Democrat objecting!?!?!?
Click to expand...
They don't need "elected" people, dood. Tapes of pundits and airheads popping off on how it is a "waste" would be enough. A few interviews and their golden. It's ripe for ad airtime, and if they get hold of one of the e-mails from anybody talking it up as a "PR Stunt" and a "Waste" even better.
 
christiefan915 said:
Link?
Click to expand...

[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
Click to expand...

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.htm

Never doubt me. :)
 
Damn Yankee said:
Hawaii itself didn't even accept the short form as proof of citizenship until it changed the policy in 2009.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the laws up until then specifically stated it wasn't evidence of that and it wasn't accepted for passport verification. It stated that no "short form or live certifications" could be used.
 
Nope I misread. It was a "Certificate of Live Birth" which is different than a "Certification of Live Birth" which is embossed by the registrar. A Certificate of Live Birth is sometimes issued by the hospital so you can get some other things filled out (things like health insurance and stuff), but isn't filed or embossed by a registrar and is insufficient to get a passport.

The form Obama provided would have been enough to get a Passport as it references the original documents and is embossed. However, if there is any questions the passport offices may request (and won't issue without) the original records.
 
Rana said:
When I talk to people in real life, I find I have a lot in common with most people and that is what I try to focus upon, rather than how we are different. When you actually get people to discuss the issues you find, they don't want to open the donut hole, again, they want young college graduates to be able to stay on their parents insurance until they can afford their own, they want people to be able to purchase insurance when they have pre-exisiting conditions. When you start to pin point people, we mostly agree on the issues, even the most die hard conservatives don't want to put old people out on the ice flow and let them go it on their own because their usefulness to society has dwindled. They don't want children to go hungry. On this forum it is easy to act soulless, but in reality, they aren't that heartless.
Click to expand...

I wonder, do you really think that's what we're arguing about.....I mean, I expect liberals could be that clueless, but more likely you're just dishonest.....
 
Rana said:
Onclear just posted an article that shows some have already missed the boat! Ahahahahahaha, I think it is hilarious!
Click to expand...

and apparently liberals should have been reading the Constitution before they posted the article.....then they wouldn't have embarrassed themselves once again.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top