Protecting children from murder/drag shows.

NiftyNiblick said:
And I don't give a fat flying fuck what you think,
fully aware that you feel the same way about me.

You are entitled to your beliefs, of course,
but if you ever try to shove something up my ass as you suggest,

your very last excruciating thought will be to curse your whore mother for having you.

You really need to learn how to control your emotions and talk to people if you don't wish to risk a bad end.
You were brought up poorly.
Click to expand...

I do not understand how any person could be as ho-hum about 20+ dead little kids as you.

It doesn't even compute to me.

If anger and outrage aren't the two emotions you feel after hearing about a school shooting, then something is fucking wrong with your brain.

I fucking HATE kids, but even I don't want them to get gunned down in school.

Does that make me a better person than you? Yes.
 
LV426 said:
How many hours of the day do you spend thinking about the sex lives and sexual organs of children? Because it's definitely not zero.

you have an unnatural and disgusting obsession with children and it needs to be addressed because it's fucking SICK.

It's SICK that you spend so much of your time thinking about what's in a kid's pants.

Fucking pervert.
Click to expand...

Oddly enough it is you who are violating rules you agreed to follow.
 
Damocles said:
Let's put this clearly.

Dems are whatever... not a 12b violation.

You are whatever... is a 12b violation.
Click to expand...

Ummm...not according to your own rule.

Your rule specifically talks about the suggestion of an encounter with a child as being the purpose of 12b.

Your rule allows for me to make the accusation that they SUPPORT the perverted things their Conservative idols want to do or have done to kids already.

As long as I'm not accusing them of committing those perverted acts themselves, I can still say that they support and defend them...which they do.
 
Damocles said:
You are (suggests pedophilia) .... is a violation.
Click to expand...

NOPE.

Not according to your own rule.

You are letting your Nazi pals call every liberal, Democrat, or Progressive on JPP a groomer.

So it looks like you're gonna have to change the rule again so you can continue running cover for your Nazi pals.
 
LV426 said:
I do not understand how any person could be as ho-hum about 20+ dead little kids as you.

It doesn't even compute to me.

If anger and outrage aren't the two emotions you feel after hearing about a school shooting, then something is fucking wrong with your brain.

I fucking HATE kids, but even I don't want them to get gunned down in school.

Does that make me a better person than you? Yes.
Click to expand...

It's important to think of yourself as a good person, LV426.

I don't think that your solution is the best for avoiding school massacres,
but I didn't resort to threats of anal impalement to express that difference of opinion.

You need to calm down.
 
LV426 said:
Ummm...not according to your own rule.

Your rule specifically talks about the suggestion of an encounter with a child as being the purpose of 12b.

Your rule allows for me to make the accusation that they SUPPORT the perverted things their Conservative idols want to do or have done to kids already.

As long as I'm not accusing them of committing those perverted acts themselves, I can still say that they support and defend them...which they do.
Click to expand...

The rule says not to try to walk that line as you will not be given the benefit of the doubt.

We are discussing the length of your ban, not the whether of it. Continuing this will only lengthen the ban. "You are a groomer" is not saying, "you support groomers."

You didn't even walk the line. You jumped right into the highway with both feet.
 
Damocles said:
Oddly enough it is you who are violating rules you agreed to follow.
Click to expand...

I'm not violating any rule because I'm not accusing them of committing those acts, I'm not accusing them of having a sexual encounter with a child, just that they support it.

And you said before that as long as I do that, I can say whatever the fuck I want.

So if you want to go back on that now, then fine...I don't expect consistency from you anyway given your habit of running cover for the worst people in the world.
 
get your popcorn ready. the narcissist living in his moms basement is getting another daily dose of reality about what a pathetic loser he actually is :laugh:
 
LV426 said:
NOPE.

Not according to your own rule.

You are letting your Nazi pals call every liberal, Democrat, or Progressive on JPP a groomer.

So it looks like you're gonna have to change the rule again so you can continue running cover for your Nazi pals.
Click to expand...

Bye-bye
 
LV426 said:
I'm not violating any rule because I'm not accusing them of committing those acts, I'm not accusing them of having a sexual encounter with a child, just that they support it.

And you said before that as long as I do that, I can say whatever the fuck I want.

So if you want to go back on that now, then fine...I don't expect consistency from you anyway given your habit of running cover for the worst people in the world.
Click to expand...

derp derp :laugh:
 
LV426 said:
It's no 12b violation because I'm not accusing them of committing that abuse, just supporting it.

There's no 12b violation to say that they think about the genitals of children...because it's true.
Click to expand...

The rule:

rule 12b said:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles about the subject, or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. or in regard to political public figures. (examples, video of Biden with children in the Senate, Trump images with his daughter in his lap, etc. stuff like that. If the political figure is a member of this board, you cannot bring it here though...) We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

I have bolded the bit that they seemed to "forget to mention"...

So.

If you talk generically about Dems/Republicans are "insert something here", you are within the limits. If you say "You are", while quoting/talking to an actual member of this board, then you finish with something that even suggests it, you are in violation of the rule.

then arguing it... Geebus, shakes head....
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Not in Florida
Click to expand...

liar....
https://www.google.com/search?q=drag%20shows%20in%20florida&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS1045US1045&oq=drag+shows+in+florida&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30l9.6320j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&tbs=lf:1,lf_ui:1&tbm=lcl&sxsrf=APwXEdcmA2zafcRPy6Zxj_BV3V42k0l_iw:1680031699103&rflfq=1&num=10&rldimm=7882930943996798359&lqi=ChVkcmFnIHNob3dzIGluIGZsb3JpZGFI54WnhuaAgIAIWh8QABABGAAYASIVZHJhZyBzaG93cyBpbiBmbG9yaWRhkgEOZGlubmVyX3RoZWF0ZXKaASNDaFpEU1VoTk1HOW5TMFZKUTBGblNVTkRiV042YzBWQkVBRaoBMxABKg4iCmRyYWcgc2hvd3MoADIfEAEiG2GrYzTPPYJJ4mv9vYmDKl5HyaPtOb0GmRuiNuABAA&phdesc=KJsONFmCDA8&ved=2ahUKEwimtIvlrf_9AhWXk4kEHUV_BAQQvS56BAgSEAE&sa=X&rlst=f#rlfi=hd:;si:7882930943996798359,l,ChVkcmFnIHNob3dzIGluIGZsb3JpZGFI54WnhuaAgIAIWh8QABABGAAYASIVZHJhZyBzaG93cyBpbiBmbG9yaWRhkgEOZGlubmVyX3RoZWF0ZXKaASNDaFpEU1VoTk1HOW5TMFZKUTBGblNVTkRiV042YzBWQkVBRaoBMxABKg4iCmRyYWcgc2hvd3MoADIfEAEiG2GrYzTPPYJJ4mv9vYmDKl5HyaPtOb0GmRuiNuABAA,y,KJsONFmCDA8;mv:[[30.7627552,-79.70327329999999],[24.2013858,-87.6393148]];tbs:lrf:!1m4!1u3!2m2!3m1!1e1!1m4!1u2!2m2!2m1!1e1!2m1!1e2!2m1!1e3!3sIAE,lf:1,lf_ui:1
 
Jarod said:
We have a right to free speech, yet Republicans are trying to limit that right in the name of protecting children from drag queens.

It is my opinion, and I think I’m pretty correct here, that protecting children from this type of murder is particularly more important.

The right to bear arms is no more important than the right to free speech.
Click to expand...

Drag shows belong in bars, just like strip shows.


Neither are appropriate for children, except to the Nambla/Glaad left, and NEITHER ARE "SPEECH".

 
PostmodernProphet said:
liar....
https://www.google.com/search?q=drag%20shows%20in%20florida&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS1045US1045&oq=drag+shows+in+florida&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30l9.6320j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&tbs=lf:1,lf_ui:1&tbm=lcl&sxsrf=APwXEdcmA2zafcRPy6Zxj_BV3V42k0l_iw:1680031699103&rflfq=1&num=10&rldimm=7882930943996798359&lqi=ChVkcmFnIHNob3dzIGluIGZsb3JpZGFI54WnhuaAgIAIWh8QABABGAAYASIVZHJhZyBzaG93cyBpbiBmbG9yaWRhkgEOZGlubmVyX3RoZWF0ZXKaASNDaFpEU1VoTk1HOW5TMFZKUTBGblNVTkRiV042YzBWQkVBRaoBMxABKg4iCmRyYWcgc2hvd3MoADIfEAEiG2GrYzTPPYJJ4mv9vYmDKl5HyaPtOb0GmRuiNuABAA&phdesc=KJsONFmCDA8&ved=2ahUKEwimtIvlrf_9AhWXk4kEHUV_BAQQvS56BAgSEAE&sa=X&rlst=f#rlfi=hd:;si:7882930943996798359,l,ChVkcmFnIHNob3dzIGluIGZsb3JpZGFI54WnhuaAgIAIWh8QABABGAAYASIVZHJhZyBzaG93cyBpbiBmbG9yaWRhkgEOZGlubmVyX3RoZWF0ZXKaASNDaFpEU1VoTk1HOW5TMFZKUTBGblNVTkRiV042YzBWQkVBRaoBMxABKg4iCmRyYWcgc2hvd3MoADIfEAEiG2GrYzTPPYJJ4mv9vYmDKl5HyaPtOb0GmRuiNuABAA,y,KJsONFmCDA8;mv:[[30.7627552,-79.70327329999999],[24.2013858,-87.6393148]];tbs:lrf:!1m4!1u3!2m2!3m1!1e1!1m4!1u2!2m2!2m1!1e1!2m1!1e2!2m1!1e3!3sIAE,lf:1,lf_ui:1
Click to expand...

The truth is not in the ambulance chaser.
 
TOP said:
I told you to be patient...;)
Click to expand...

Did you add LV to your tally board of People I Weeported and Got Banned yet? We knew you'd finally score one! Sadly for you, I am still here, and so is Mason, DU, Evince, Christie, Guno, EE, Cypress, Walt, Frank, and everyone else you fear and hate. But not Jack. :laugh:
 
LV426 said:
Whether or not it exists doesn't change the fact that you and your pervert pals thought about doing that.

If you spend even 1 second of your day thinking about the genitals of children, then you are a fucking pedophile.

And you definitely spend at least that much time thinking about kids' genitals, because you post about them nonstop.

Perv.
Click to expand...
Probably best you don't even go there, LV. Take a breath, dear.

FWIW, I have no doubt the Snitch Bitches are hypocrites and reported you despite all their whining and moaning about their friends being reported for 12B violations. May they all die painful deaths from asshole cancer.

6xp695.jpg
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Did you add LV to your tally board of People I Weeported and Got Banned yet? We knew you'd finally score one! Sadly for you, I am still here, and so is Mason, DU, Evince, Christie, Guno, EE, Cypress, Walt, Frank, and everyone else you fear and hate. But not Jack. :laugh:
Click to expand...

I bet she did. That's how hypocritical victim-mentality evil people like her roll. The morning liquor doesn't help her either.

6xqqz1.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top