Protecting children from murder/drag shows.

Bigdog said:
The Robb elementary teachers were not armed.
Click to expand...

Ah, but they COULD BE because the law allowed it.

Your rationale for arming teachers is that it's a deterrent, right? So the teacher doesn't even NEED to be armed since the mere prospect of the teacher being armed is what you say is the deterrent.

Clearly, it's not.


Section 12b violation. Will a mod ban you?
Click to expand...

How is it a 12b violation? I'm not accusing you of committing that abuse, just that you defend and support it.
 
LV426 said:
How many hours of the day do you spend thinking about the sex lives and sexual organs of children? Because it's definitely not zero.

you have an unnatural and disgusting obsession with children and it needs to be addressed because it's fucking SICK.

It's SICK that you spend so much of your time thinking about what's in a kid's pants.

Fucking pervert.
Click to expand...

12 b - get this shit stain off the forum
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
They definitely are very, very concerned about trans athletes, as well as forbidding the mention of trans ppl in school, making sure our pronouns are gender-specific, and policing who uses which bathroom. All the many problems in education, including school shootings, but what does the QOP focus on?
Click to expand...

I don't think it has anything to do with athletics...I think it's Conservative perversion because they're obsessed with the sexual organs of children...since that's what they think about.

You don't get to that point without putting serious thought into kids' genitals.
 
Yakuda said:
Yeah I know you don't like the word but no other word better describes them. Yes the signature reveals exactly why I use the r word to refer to them. Being polite considerate to them is a waste of time. They have no desire to compromise and being kind to a bully only makes them bolder.
Click to expand...
I'm just letting you know because certain people get upset when I only ask some not to use it and not all... there are other much more fitting words worthy to assign her and some of the others here...but carry on... (actually when I started school to get my degree there were EMR and TMR labels..those were replaced..
My actual certification was in the education of the developmentally handicapped....) but I think LV 426 is deserving of her own category...;)
 
zymurgy said:
derp derp

also - I reported it and honestly hope you are booted for good.
Click to expand...

Well you wasted your time because I am a 12b expert thanks to Damocles and am not in any violation of 12b because I'm not accusing you directly of committing abuse.

Here's the rule, where in my posts did I suggest that you entered into an encounter with the kid?

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles about the subject, or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. or in regard to political public figures. (examples, video of Biden with children in the Senate, Trump images with his daughter in his lap, etc. stuff like that. If the political figure is a member of this board, you cannot bring it here though...) We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

I did not violate a single sentence of this by accusing you of thinking about perverted things.
 
Jarod said:
We have a right to free speech, yet Republicans are trying to limit that right in the name of protecting children from drag queens.

It is my opinion, and I think I’m pretty correct here, that protecting children from this type of murder is particularly more important.

The right to bear arms is no more important than the right to free speech.
Click to expand...

you are free to attend a drag show.......you are free to take your children along.......you are even free to attend.......just don't do it in schools, libraries or other publically funded locations......
 
LV426 said:
It's no 12b violation because I'm not accusing them of committing that abuse, just supporting it.

There's no 12b violation to say that they think about the genitals of children...because it's true.
Click to expand...

12b...;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top