not so... I have not once lied about anything concerning that subjectWhich is a lie unto itself; because you are an admitted gun smuggler, you have lied about it, and now you compound the lie by saying you don't lie.
Any amendments must pass congress before it can be considered by the states...so it starts there.
that is not, however, what you said.... you said continuing the discussion was contingent on me admitting something... I did, and then you ran away like a fucking pussy. Your "on-line courage" is, I am sure, just as big as your real world courage. Nutless gasbag. ::yawn::
The Following User Groans At Taft2016 For This Awful Post:
maineman (Today)
We need more than a super heroRacists know that all the people they put into imaginary groups all behave in exactly the same way. That is why racists are such screaming bores, always. God help America!
As expected, nothing more of relevance to add.
Gelding windbag.
these are polar opposites, so what exactly are you askingwere the justices who decided Plessy v. Ferguson tyrants, or were the ones who decided Brown v. Board of Education? Perhaps neither?
this is not accurate. an amendment can be made through the states alone if congress does not want to act.Any amendments must pass congress before it can be considered by the states...so it starts there.
this is not accurate. an amendment can be made through the states alone if congress does not want to act.
use the quote function you retard of the highest orderfucking A your stupid
desh, even if 299 million people wanted to ignore the constitution and ban guns, it would still make you an anti american freedom hater. background checks are unconstitutional by default.how many Americans wanted background checks you delusional asshole?
but your hired mercs do? i think not, traitorYour in the vast minority.
your guns don't give you the power to be a fucking tyrant