canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I don't think she was lying.
What do you call it when someone knowing tells a falsehood?
Also, care to take the bet?
I don't think she was lying.
Ok, so I agree with you that HRC likely knows that the marking of the document is not relevant as to how it SHOULD be treated.......
I don't think she was lying.
What do you call it when someone knowing tells a falsehood?
Also, care to take the bet?
lol.....Jarod doesn't think she was lying, he just doesn't think she's telling the truth.......
No, I wont bet because I agree with the premise, why would I bet against something I believe to be true?
Throwing out a red herring is not a lie, simply is not. You can call a cat a dog all day... its still a cat.
How is this not lying. You are admitting that she is stating a known falsehood and you seem OK with it.
No, I just think she was saying something that was not relevant. What she said was the truth, just not relevant.
Is that too complex for you?
I think you need to look up the definition of a red herring. What she is saying is not a red herring. It is a flat out lie.
A red herring would be saying "yeah I know I sent classified information but Martians kidnapped and raped me"
That is a red herring.
However I give you partial credit for admitting that she is not telling the truth. Which is lying.
She told the truth.
She told the truth.
so when she said she had destroyed all the emails that she hadn't turned in........and there were undestroyed emails she hadn't turned in......... she told the truth?.......
when she said the only emails she had left were personal emails to her family and one of them turned out to be from Panetta and named an undercover operative in Libya, she told the truth?............
when she said there was no classified information in the emails and they could be released and the Obama administration redacted 100% of an email because it was too sensitive to make public, she told the truth?......
Well she may be telling the truth that they weren't officially marked but that doesn't absolve her of responsibility and you know it.
Exactly, you finally understand!
So you think that clears her of her responsibility? Do you agree then that she is guilty of mishandling classified information?
If not why not?
It does not clear her, I agree.
So should she be indicted? If not why not?
It is democrat party. Democratic is an adjective.
You have been bullied into changing the English language to suit the propaganda of leftists
admitted you refuse to answer the real questions.......as to what was marked, it's well established she knew what things were required to be marked top secret.....she was, after all, the SoS......Your shifting..... I'm talking about the statement that the info was not marked, "top secret".