Pro lifers show no mercy

Lorca said:
That's fine....we have lots of laws to protect children. But we're talking about the unborn..and that is what it is and we've already determined that its rights do not supersede the woman's.
Click to expand...

and we've also decided the woman's rights do not supersede the unborn child's......
 
Women must be free to choose to defend themselves against having the babies they carelessly procreate, don't they?

Why, those babies could cost a busy woman time off from work, or school, or anything else she'd rather be doing than dealing the consequences of her choice to get pregnant.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
will sacrificing nine months of her life result in all that?.......
Click to expand...

"Sacrificing" 9 months of her life.

Are you willing to let some stranger tell you to "sacrifice" 9 months of your life? Sounds pretty miserable to me. Esp. if you are not overjoyed and waiting with open arms.

So...tell me again what right you or the govt have to tell a woman to make that sacrifice with her life?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
of course you are.....you say its wrong for us to oppose abortion because of risks to the mother's life, which still leaves us with the other 99% as tag-a-long killings.....
Click to expand...

No no. I'm not the one that *picked out three main reasons* to allow that murder of the fetus: rape, incest, mother's life in danger.

*I* let the woman choose any reason OR option.

I"m not saying you're wrong to oppose it for those reasons, I'm saying that by doing so, you are admitting that the rights of the fetus are not equal to those of the woman. Because you have yet to come up with any examples where it's ok to murder children (by definition 'born'), or adults for that matter, in order to save a woman from mental anguish, terrible health consequences, or death.
 
Lorca said:
So...tell me again what right you or the govt have to tell a woman to make that sacrifice with her life?
Click to expand...

It's called force of law, and it's applied every day when women are constrained by the government from making certain "choices"...and if they make those "choices" anyway in defiance of law, they may sacrifice more than 9 months.

Pro-lifers just want to make the choice to kill a defenseless baby one of the governments proscribed behaviors again.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
thank you.....you want them dead.....not so noble......
Click to expand...

You CHOOSE to personify these bundles of tissue that nature itself often decides to discard. That is your problem...creepy and needy if you ask me, but certainly your right. You are welcome to it.

However you should NOT be able to force that notion on someone who does not wish to personify it and ask them to sacrifice their future, health, and even life because YOU do.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
of course you are.....you say its wrong for us to oppose abortion because of risks to the mother's life, which still leaves us with the other 99% as tag-a-long killings.....
Click to expand...

No....ANY pregnancy carries the risk of life-long heath issues or even death.

Once again...for the cheap seats: it is not up to YOU to decide that for someone else.

You have avoided answering how you would feel strangers or the govt forced YOU to take such risks.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and we've also decided the woman's rights do not supersede the unborn child's......
Click to expand...

Again?

Then, as most pro-lifers concede, how is it ok to 'murder' the 'baby' in cases of rape, incest, or if woman's life is in danger? (pro-lifer terminology in quotes.)

Really, we've covered this, ad infinitem. I know it kills you to face it but man up and admit it. Or revert back to your politician shilling.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top