Private server v. Public restaurant...?

Milagro said:
Well we are certainly not going to believe what you want.
Click to expand...

Like Bush II reading to some kids at a school and not getting hysterical when told what was happening with the World Trade Center. It is painfully obvious (painful enough that I can't stand to watch CNN...they're worse than MSNBC right now) that everything Trump and team does will be scrutinized to the nth degree. Here is the difference between he and Obama and the scrutinization they have received and are receiving...pay attention now:

While Obama received his share of scrutiny from the right there was only one major network dwelling on it to the point you got tired of hearing/seeing it. I quit watching Fox long ago because of it. With the scrutiny of Trump there are 3.5 (;))major networks talking about it non stop.

They can't believe their guy lost and they're screaming from the rooftops about their dissatisfaction.

Edit: I forgot to pose this question. I wonder who knows what was discussed when the NS guys surrounded Trumps table?
 
Last edited:
sear said:
Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
"Nope, not invited... Members of the club and there guests were at the Restaurant. Not invited guests." J

"Exactly, they weren't just walking in off the street." S #15

Squabble about it all you like.
What I've read about it indicates there is NO PLACE in that environment suited to introducing classified information.

The reports I've seen of it indicate, if classified information was divulged, that by itself, in that location, was a violation.
Click to expand...

IF IF IF.....you either KNOW what was discussed or you don't.....and you don't. People either heard what was discussed or they didn't....

What is this 'violation' you mention....a violation of what ?

this entire topic and ridiculous far fetched assumptions is utter nonsense
 
Thing1 said:
I don't think there is any doubt about this:

The level of hypocrisy we're going to see over the next 4 years is going to be an epic thing. It will be colossal. It will completely redefine hypocrisy as we know it.
Click to expand...

And not a single JPP Rightie will EVER acknowledge the aforementioned hypocrisy.
 
Thing1 said:
I don't think there is any doubt about this:

The level of hypocrisy we're going to see over the next 4 years is going to be an epic thing. It will be colossal. It will completely redefine hypocrisy as we know it.
Click to expand...

ZappasGuitar said:
And not a single JPP Rightie will EVER acknowledge the aforementioned hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

laughing out loud......

the level of hypocrisy and Trump derangement from the pinhead left is what is colossal....I point it out several times a day, every time I log on....

denial of unfounded and unproven accusations is not hypocrisy by any stretch of the definition....
 
NOVA said:
laughing out loud......

the level of hypocrisy and Trump derangement from the pinhead left is what is colossal....I point it out several times a day, every time I log on....

denial of unfounded and unproven accusations is not hypocrisy by any stretch of the definition....
Click to expand...

Nah.

There is more hypocrisy on the right.
 
Thing1 said:
Nah.

There is more hypocrisy on the right.
Click to expand...

Insistently, what is the supposed hypocrisy in this thread....

Jarod says....
Private server v. Public restaurant...?
1,,,So HRC stored emails about her daughters wedding on a private server, and they chanted Lock Her Up!


2,,,Donald Trump conducts emergency foreign policy at a public table in a restaurant...
​
Click to expand...

1 is proven undeniable fact

2 is unproven conjecture, that even if true is,a " so what... " moment.

you call that some sort of hypocrisy ? some imagined equivalency ?...
 
NOVA said:
Insistently, what is the supposed hypocrisy in this thread....



1 is proven undeniable fact

2 is unproven conjecture, that even if true is,a " so what... " moment.

you call that some sort of hypocrisy ?
Click to expand...

And "worse than Watergate" wasn't conjecture? Remember - that was after Comey's letter 11 days before the election. And it turned out that nothing came of that.

Yeah, no doubt. You guys are much more hypocritical. It's like a religion w/ you.
 
NOVA said:
Insistently, what is the supposed hypocrisy in this thread....



1 is proven undeniable fact

2 is unproven conjecture, that even if true is,a " so what... " moment.

you call that some sort of hypocrisy ? some imagined equivalency ?...
Click to expand...

Thing1 said:
And "worse than Watergate" wasn't conjecture? Remember - that was after Comey's letter 11 days before the election. And it turned out that nothing came of that.

Yeah, no doubt. You guys are much more hypocritical. It's like a religion w/ you.
Click to expand...

So you can't answer....understandable....

understandable because you're a hypocrite....
 
"IF IF IF.....you either KNOW what was discussed or you don't.....and you don't. People either heard what was discussed or they didn't....
What is this 'violation' you mention....a violation of what ?" N #22

The premise of the thread, and the prominence of this topic in mainstream news is that it was.

Do you really think: "they ate dinner" would be making headlines?!

"What is this 'violation' you mention....a violation of what ?" N #22

United States federal security protocols, which bear even on U.S. presidents. FYI no one in the U.S. is above the law.

"I am not a crook." President Richard M. Nixon, shortly before he resigned his office in disgrace
 
"are we SERIOUSLY discussing classified protocol after Clinton's private server shenanigans??" #35

Of course!

You prefer a DOUBLE-standard? Criticize Democrats, but ignore any wrong done by any Republican?

"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt, that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
U.S. President Bush (the younger) televised address to the U.S. March 17th, 2003
 
Wonder how many of those restaurant employees had their security clearance. I know it took quite a while to get mine. Even with a clearance, we are not to tell another person with a clearance any information unless they have a 'Need-to-know'. But ya know.. same argument I had with Hillary's emails, if there was sensitive information being discussed, they need to be thrown in jail, because I know I would be.
 
"Wonder how many of those restaurant employees had their security clearance." DD #37

And how many of the guests?
 
Stretch said:
This is starting to get Hercule Poirot-ish.
Click to expand...

I respect that reference.

A larger concern to me is Trump's continued use of a civilian (and slightly outdated) Android phone. He has the one that he's supposed to be using but he still has the old one. Those can be hacked just as easily as a private email server and used in much more creative ways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top