haha
So you are as stupid as Terry. I was just testing that.,
So when it comes to speaking about events like below you expect people to not use Ai or google and only recite from memory, or search out original web sites not using google, as Terry has said, which is sheer stupidity.
Not just that if i stated what is the quote below you magats would demand, rightly, that i provide citations to what i am claiming.
Only an idiot, meaning you or Terry, would say DO NOT use AI or google search to pull together the facts to support the claims you are making as if people stating things from memory is the more reliable way to do it.
But then no one would accuse a magat of being smart.
Sorry, apparently I did not dumb it down enough. You can use AI all you want. I use it all the time too. In Grimy Pecker's case, copying every single reply straight from AI and never typing one word of your own is pathetic at best. I would hope even you could agree with that. Using AI to help flush out the actual truth that answers whatever question you're asking is absolutely fine.
Now here is where it gets bumpy for morons like you and your ilk. AI cannot make you any smarter, not even a little bit. It can only temporarily stuff a moron's head, or in many JPP libtard's case, a comment or reply, with irrelevant garbage that misses the target entirely. That usually happens because you are not smart enough to ask the right questions.
This goes straight back to the fact that all drones are what I call low resolution thinkers or single variant thinkers or sometime level one thinkers. In other words, the kind of moron who can handle one simple thought at a time, which makes you perfect for getting suckered into believing anything anyone with nefarious goals wants you to swallow whole, just like your puppet masters feed you daily.
For example, this is why you can ask AI if men are paid more than women, get the canned answer, and rush here proud as a peacock, excited to paste your brilliant AI findings as if you solved the equation. In reality you need to ask at least twenty other questions or what people call variables to have any chance of getting to the truth or the correct answer. Any real multi variant peer reviewed study shows there is virtually zero income gap due to gender discrimination. The number is so small it is statistically irrelevant. I know I have already lost you, but it is difficult for me to dumb it down any further.
Let me prove it really easily. Tell me exactly what point you are trying to make about Trump's trip to China. After you figure out what you are trying to say and write it down, go use that AI to make your case. Then I will demonstrate precisely what I am talking about as I've already done in one case here, but why not one more time. I will wait right here.
I hope this helps clear it up.
