President Trump just declared the pardons done for the “Unselect Committee” and many others to be “VOID, VACANT, AND NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT”

I already posted it, dumbass,

Try and keep up.

{
The ESIGN Act:

  • Provides that any law with a requirement for a signature may be satisfied by an electronic signature
  • Allows electronically executed agreements to be presented as evidence in court
  • Prevents denial of legal effect, validity, or enforceability of an electronically signed document solely because it is in electronic form}
There are stipulations, as previously posted;

{Proof of signing is demonstrated via a secured process that often includes an audit trail and a final tamper-evident digital certificate embedded into the completed signed document.}

That was not satisfied, as Veggie Joe did not institute the signatory action.

The question now is which pardons Senile Old Joe actually signed? It's unfortunately looking like those given to his coconspirators, Merchan, Colangelo, and the J6 Show Trial vermin were probably legitimately signed.
So they were signed. It makes no difference. You cannot 'pardon' someone that has not yet been convicted of anything. What are you 'pardoning'???
 
I already posted it, dumbass,

Try and keep up.

{
The ESIGN Act:

  • Provides that any law with a requirement for a signature may be satisfied by an electronic signature
  • Allows electronically executed agreements to be presented as evidence in court
  • Prevents denial of legal effect, validity, or enforceability of an electronically signed document solely because it is in electronic form}
There are stipulations, as previously posted;

{Proof of signing is demonstrated via a secured process that often includes an audit trail and a final tamper-evident digital certificate embedded into the completed signed document.}
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this is how far gone Uncensored is in his delusions. He simply denies that video of Biden signing something exists even when it not only exists but was witnessed by several people including journalists and photographers.
That was not satisfied, as Veggie Joe did not institute the signatory action.

The question now is which pardons Senile Old Joe actually signed? It's unfortunately looking like those given to his coconspirators, Merchan, Colangelo, and the J6 Show Trial vermin were probably legitimately signed.


The problem is that the signature is accepted unless and until you can provide evidence that Biden didn't know anything about it. The fact that Biden released a statement talking about the pardons would be prima facia evidence that he was aware of the pardons being issued.

"The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgement that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offence," Mr Biden said in a statement.
 
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this is how far gone Uncensored is in his delusions. He simply denies that video of Biden signing something exists even when it not only exists but was witnessed by several people including journalists and photographers.
Stop making shit up.
The problem is that the signature is accepted unless and until you can provide evidence that Biden didn't know anything about it.
Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.
The fact that Biden released a statement talking about the pardons would be prima facia evidence that he was aware of the pardons being issued.
How do you 'pardon' someone that hasn't done anything, Poorboy???
"The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgement that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offence," Mr Biden said in a statement.
Yet it is. Biden can't change that.
 
Did you know the Constitution is law, Poorboy??
I know the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. I asked you to quote where it says in the Constitution that an autopen is not a valid signature like you claimed.
Oh look, Into the Night can't actually quote anything from the Constitution that says autopen is not a valid signature?

I'm not trying to, Poorboy. Autopen, however, can easily result in a forged document.
You once again do a masterful job of making yourself look foolish.
 
Back
Top