President Trump calls on Jay Jones to drop out of the Virginia AG race after texts surfaced where he fantasized about kiIIing a Republican lawmaker

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Does that mean Donnie will resign as President since he suggested a firing squad for Liz Cheney?

Or is it OK when Donnie does it?
Click to expand...
No, Trump did not threaten Liz Cheney with a firing squad.

Liz Cheney is “a deranged person,” the GOP nominee said, “but the reason she couldn’t stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people. I don’t want to go to war. She wanted to go – she wanted to stay in Iraq. I took them out. I mean, if [it] were up to her, we’d, we’d be in 50 different countries. She’s a radical war hawk.”

He then said, “Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh, gee, well, let’s send, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.”

The “firing squad” claim isn’t even a little bit true. It doesn’t lack context. He simply didn’t say what they said he said. Worse than merely mischaracterizing his remarks, these reporters and their editors almost certainly understood exactly what Trump meant. They’re simply pretending otherwise.

Trump said nothing new. He simply dusted off the well-worn argument, the “chickenhawk” criticism, that says direct involvement may cool one’s support for military conflict. Or, as the show “Letterkenny” put it, it’s the notion that says, “Maybe, if you’d ever been in a real fight, you might not be so keen for another.”

 
ziggy said:
No, Trump did not threaten Liz Cheney with a firing squad.

Liz Cheney is “a deranged person,” the GOP nominee said, “but the reason she couldn’t stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people. I don’t want to go to war. She wanted to go – she wanted to stay in Iraq. I took them out. I mean, if [it] were up to her, we’d, we’d be in 50 different countries. She’s a radical war hawk.”

He then said, “Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh, gee, well, let’s send, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.”

The “firing squad” claim isn’t even a little bit true. It doesn’t lack context. He simply didn’t say what they said he said. Worse than merely mischaracterizing his remarks, these reporters and their editors almost certainly understood exactly what Trump meant. They’re simply pretending otherwise.

Trump said nothing new. He simply dusted off the well-worn argument, the “chickenhawk” criticism, that says direct involvement may cool one’s support for military conflict. Or, as the show “Letterkenny” put it, it’s the notion that says, “Maybe, if you’d ever been in a real fight, you might not be so keen for another.”

Click to expand...
Lying goy look at the 1 minute mark

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2qdbYfrjT0
 
ziggy said:
No, Trump did not threaten Liz Cheney with a firing squad.

Liz Cheney is “a deranged person,” the GOP nominee said, “but the reason she couldn’t stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people. I don’t want to go to war. She wanted to go – she wanted to stay in Iraq. I took them out. I mean, if [it] were up to her, we’d, we’d be in 50 different countries. She’s a radical war hawk.”

He then said, “Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Oh, gee, well, let’s send, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.”

The “firing squad” claim isn’t even a little bit true. It doesn’t lack context. He simply didn’t say what they said he said. Worse than merely mischaracterizing his remarks, these reporters and their editors almost certainly understood exactly what Trump meant. They’re simply pretending otherwise.

Trump said nothing new. He simply dusted off the well-worn argument, the “chickenhawk” criticism, that says direct involvement may cool one’s support for military conflict. Or, as the show “Letterkenny” put it, it’s the notion that says, “Maybe, if you’d ever been in a real fight, you might not be so keen for another.”

Click to expand...
Hmmm... So you agree that you just lied about what Jay Jones actually said vs your characterization.

Jones said - Only when they feel pain personally do the move forward.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Hmmm... So you agree that you just lied about what Jay Jones actually said vs your characterization.

Jones said - Only when they feel pain personally do the move forward.
Click to expand...

Jones fantasizes about murdering Republicans, pissing on their graves and then force Republican mothers to watch as their children are slaughtered over politics and wants cops to get killed to deter other cops from doing their jobs.

Trump wants to send warhawks to war.

Big difference.
 
ziggy said:
Jones fantasizes about murdering Republicans, pissing on their graves and then force Republican mothers to watch as their children are slaughtered over politics and wants cops to get killed to deter other cops from doing their jobs.

Trump wants to send warhawks to war.

Big difference.
Click to expand...
And there is your lie. He doesn't say anything about murdering any children unless the children are named Hitler and pol pot.
 
ziggy said:
Jones fantasizes about murdering Republicans, pissing on their graves and then force Republican mothers to watch as their children are slaughtered over politics and wants cops to get killed to deter other cops from doing their jobs.

Trump wants to send warhawks to war.

Big difference.
Click to expand...
The only difference is the way you exaggerate one and exonerate the other.
 

Virginia Dems quietly fret that refusal to dump AG candidate Jay Jones is hurting party: ‘Avoid him like the plague’​


Virginia Democrats are publicly standing by commonwealth attorney general candidate Jay Jones — despite his texts fantasizing about murdering the Republican former state House speaker and forcing his wife to watch her children die — but some in the party are quietly worrying that the refusal to dump him will hurt them in November.

“If I was a Democrat running for governor in Virginia or lieutenant governor, I would criticize him and separate myself from him as quickly as possible, because what he said was deplorable and reprehensible,” Democratic strategist Brad Bannon told The Post.

“They should avoid Jay Jones like the plague.”

nypost.com

Exclusive | Virginia Dems quietly fret that refusal to dump AG candidate Jay Jones is hurting party: ‘Avoid him like the plague’

“They should avoid Jay Jones like the plague,” a Democratic strategist told The Post.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top