President Obama takes the heat President Bush did not

meme

New member
waaaa, leave Barry alone..
LOTS of comments with whiny article.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

SNIP:
By JOSH GERSTEIN * 12/29/09 10:33 PM EST Text Size- + reset

The criticism received by President Obama stands in sharp contrast to the lack of complaints towards President Bush eight years ago regarding the 'shoe bomber' incident.

Eight years ago, a terrorist bomber’s attempt to blow up a transatlantic airliner was thwarted by a group of passengers, an incident that revealed some gaping holes in airline security just a few months after the attacks of Sept. 11. But it was six days before President George W. Bush, then on vacation, made any public remarks about the so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid, and there were virtually no complaints from the press or any opposition Democrats that his response was sluggish or inadequate.


That stands in sharp contrast to the withering criticism President Barack Obama has received from Republicans and some in the press for his reaction to Friday’s incident on a Northwest Airlines flight heading for Detroit.


Democrats have seized on the disparity and are making it a centerpiece of their efforts to counter GOP attacks on the White House. “This hypocrisy demonstrates Republicans are playing politics with issues of national security and terrorism,” DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan said. “That they would use this incident as an opportunity to fan partisan flames … tells you all you need to know about how far the Republican Party has fallen and how out of step with the American people they have become.”


The Democrats’ counterattack is aimed largely at two Republican congressmen who have been particularly critical of Obama, Reps. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) and Peter King (R-N.Y.). But neither GOP lawmaker concedes applying a double standard to Obama.


But the similarities between last Friday’s incident and the attempted shoe bombing in 2001 are striking.


This year’s attack came on Christmas. The attempt eight years ago took place on Dec. 22. Obama was on vacation in Hawaii when the suspect, Omar Abdulmutallab, allegedly used plastic explosives in his try to blow up the Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight. Bush was at Camp David when Reid used similar plastic explosives to try to blow up his Paris-to-Miami flight, which diverted to Boston after the incident.


Like the Obama White House, the Bush White House told reporters the president had been briefed on the incident and was following it closely. While the Obama White House issued a background statement through a senior administration official calling the incident an “attempted terrorist attack” on the same day it took place, the early official statements from Bush aides did not make the same explicit statement.


Bush did not address reporters about the Reid episode until December 28, after he had traveled from Camp David to his ranch in Texas.


Democrats do not appear to have criticized Bush over the delay. Many were wary of publicly clashing with the commander in chief, who was getting lofty approval ratings after what appeared to be a successful military campaign in Afghanistan. The media also seemed to have little interest in pressing Bush about the bombing, or the fact that the incident had revealed a previously unknown vulnerability in airplane security — that shoes could be used to hide chemicals or explosive devices.


An Agence France-Presse story was one of the few to call attention to the silence from Bush and other top officials.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/31049.html#ixzz0bBzJ8B0W
 
Last edited:
waaaa, leave Barry alone..
LOTS of comments with whiny article.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

SNIP:
By JOSH GERSTEIN * 12/29/09 10:33 PM EST Text Size- + reset

The criticism received by President Obama stands in sharp contrast to the lack of complaints towards President Bush eight years ago regarding the 'shoe bomber' incident.

Eight years ago, a terrorist bomber’s attempt to blow up a transatlantic airliner was thwarted by a group of passengers, an incident that revealed some gaping holes in airline security just a few months after the attacks of Sept. 11. But it was six days before President George W. Bush, then on vacation, made any public remarks about the so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid, and there were virtually no complaints from the press or any opposition Democrats that his response was sluggish or inadequate.


That stands in sharp contrast to the withering criticism President Barack Obama has received from Republicans and some in the press for his reaction to Friday’s incident on a Northwest Airlines flight heading for Detroit.


Democrats have seized on the disparity and are making it a centerpiece of their efforts to counter GOP attacks on the White House. “This hypocrisy demonstrates Republicans are playing politics with issues of national security and terrorism,” DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan said. “That they would use this incident as an opportunity to fan partisan flames … tells you all you need to know about how far the Republican Party has fallen and how out of step with the American people they have become.”


The Democrats’ counterattack is aimed largely at two Republican congressmen who have been particularly critical of Obama, Reps. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) and Peter King (R-N.Y.). But neither GOP lawmaker concedes applying a double standard to Obama.


But the similarities between last Friday’s incident and the attempted shoe bombing in 2001 are striking.


This year’s attack came on Christmas. The attempt eight years ago took place on Dec. 22. Obama was on vacation in Hawaii when the suspect, Omar Abdulmutallab, allegedly used plastic explosives in his try to blow up the Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight. Bush was at Camp David when Reid used similar plastic explosives to try to blow up his Paris-to-Miami flight, which diverted to Boston after the incident.


Like the Obama White House, the Bush White House told reporters the president had been briefed on the incident and was following it closely. While the Obama White House issued a background statement through a senior administration official calling the incident an “attempted terrorist attack” on the same day it took place, the early official statements from Bush aides did not make the same explicit statement.


Bush did not address reporters about the Reid episode until December 28, after he had traveled from Camp David to his ranch in Texas.


Democrats do not appear to have criticized Bush over the delay. Many were wary of publicly clashing with the commander in chief, who was getting lofty approval ratings after what appeared to be a successful military campaign in Afghanistan. The media also seemed to have little interest in pressing Bush about the bombing, or the fact that the incident had revealed a previously unknown vulnerability in airplane security — that shoes could be used to hide chemicals or explosive devices.


An Agence France-Presse story was one of the few to call attention to the silence from Bush and other top officials.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/31049.html#ixzz0bBzJ8B0W

What's this?

Mini-meme pointing out that conservatives are being two-faced whiny crybabies with regard to this latest bombing attempt.

Well, even a broken clock is right twice a day.:cof1:
 
Infantile insults.

When we were attacked on 911 eleven I backed Bush.

I thought he stole the election (and still think so by proof of the felons list alone) But I backed him in the time of crisis.

Remember the approval ratings at like 90%?

I backed him because he was the only president the US had at the time. I gave him the benifit of my doubt and backed him.

I was repaid by LIES to take us into a war for profit based on lies.

Do you think If Gore had been allowed to take his office that the right would have done the same?

I dont think you would have seen a Gore backed by republicans in the same numbers.

They will never back this president in ANYTHING he does.
 
There you have it.

They will lie about him and never back him all out of party over country

wrong..I'm backing MY COUNTRY over the "thug in Chief and his comrades in arms..

it's the liberals who are goosestepping SHEEP..and don't care to about all the commies, thugs, radicals this President has surrounded himself with..
 
what is your "my country" meme?

that is the place where this community organizer radical commie loving President hates, unless he can "Fundamentally" change it into some SOCIALIST-Commie, freedom destroying VISION for him and his comrades in arms..
 
you got that right..
I won't back any commie loving radical thug as my President..:good4u:


I would have backed Obama had there been one thing about his grandstanding and promises of Change You Can Believe In while on the campaign trail, that were even remotely true.

The only change I can believe in is that our country is going to change in ways that I hope I never live to see played out.
 
that is the place where this community organizer radical commie loving President hates, unless he can "Fundamentally" change it into some SOCIALIST-Commie, freedom destroying VISION for him and his comrades in arms..



You do realize that is all insults and has absolutely no substance in it right?
 
You do realize that is all insults and has absolutely no substance in it right?


nope, just the way I see things..
I listened to you lefties insane INSULTS for eight years, now the shoe is on the other foot you all just don't like that, do ya..:cof1:
 
Of course she knows.

Insults and vulgarity are all she has to offer.

and the above is the only SHIT you ever post..
well unles it's about SEX TAPES....
images-1.jpg
 
Back
Top