President Obama just kicked dumps ass.........

and, he's still fine as ever!

nseq01qu5qu51.jpg
 
Wednesday evening in South Philadelphia, supporters decorated cars with Biden flags and impromptu line dances broke out before the program began. The event was not open to the public due to the coronavirus pandemic, and was attended only by people who received tickets through the Biden campaign. It was livestreamed on the Biden campaign’s website.

How many people did Obama let keep their homes in lieu of bailing out the big banks and giving the big banks all their homes?
Hmm?
 
30n1wr.jpg


Educated, successful, and reasonably well off

Don King and Mike Tyson have both been to PRISON, but you are so desperate for someone to support trump, you put those two. Herman Cain is not supporting trump, because trump killed him.

8 of them are not well educated.
 
You don't worship him...you live vicariously through him because your own life is a gigantic dumpster fire of no success.

So you latch onto others.

But the real joke is that Trump's not a success either.

Grow up, asshole.
 
But back on topic. Obama is the first president who lashed out at his successor like he is doing. Not only has he lashed out publicly, he is out campaigning against him.
 
No books were stolen in this activity.

The heart of the Black/White race problem in America is that the bottom photograph depict a group of Black Americans who have at most an IQ of 85 (85 is the the average for African Americans). Reckless, impulsive violence/criminality (like rioting, looting) is a classic low IQ behaviour in urban areas.

The successful Blacks in to top photographs have a substantially higher IQ than the Black average, BUT they represent a smallish minority of the total Black population.

If you want to know the details of why there has always been a serious Black/white racial problem in America you can read the facts in a book called "The Bell Curve" by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein, published in 1994. The left in America have always demonized it as a modern "Mein Kampf". The fact is that it is high-quality, (both authors worked out of Harvard University) scientific research, but it speaks a Truth that is EXTREMELY politically incorrect.


Dachshund
 
But back on topic. Obama is the first president who lashed out at his successor like he is doing. Not only has he lashed out publicly, he is out campaigning against him.

Did you notice how Obama's speech style was quite "manly", quite "No- Bull Shit" - in a word quite "Trumpish". Usually Obama's speeches are long low-testosterone, dead- boring Soy Boy monologues. This one had a lot more pizzaz, and passion, and energy than normal. He raised the volume as well and was close to shouting at times I think this was Obama trying to copy some of the aspects of Trump's rhetorical style that work so well for him at his MAGA rallies. I honestly don't know how Obama managed to" lift his game" and try to speak with some real conviction. Maybe Michelle poked a 3 inch stick of shaved ginger root up his black bottom just before he went on ?


Dachshund



PS: I don't see how Obama can have the nerve to come out and speak in public like that when everyone knows he's a Marxist criminal. A former President who is guilty of treason. I mean, who's going to want to listen to what a scumbag like that has to say ? Who could possibly take a word of it seriously ?
 
Last edited:
But back on topic. Obama is the first president who lashed out at his successor like he is doing. Not only has he lashed out publicly, he is out campaigning against him.

Untrue. Reichwing myth.

"Is Obama the only president in U.S. history to denounce his successor?

"The short answer is no. There are several presidents in recent history who have spoken out against their successors to different news and media outlets. "

https://kslnewsradio.com/1924939/fact-check-is-obama-the-only-president-to-criticize-a-successor/?
 
Not one of them came out and publicly campaigned for any candidate, now did they?

Wrong, again. Maybe ask that fake teacher to read you the article? From the link:

"George H.W. Bush, like Mr. Obama, had a general rule of not speaking against successors. Yet, he did so often while campaigning for Republican candidates during the 1994 mid-term elections. "

Now you'll quibble that it didn't say that he campaigned for presidential candidates. :laugh:
 
Wrong, again. Maybe ask that fake teacher to read you the article? From the link:

"George H.W. Bush, like Mr. Obama, had a general rule of not speaking against successors. Yet, he did so often while campaigning for Republican candidates during the 1994 mid-term elections. "

Now you'll quibble that it didn't say that he campaigned for presidential candidates. :laugh:

Again, to rehash my original post that no prior president campaigned for any candidate running against his successor.
Try to keep up with the program :rolleyes:
 
Again, to rehash my original post that no prior president campaigned for any candidate running against his successor.
Try to keep up with the program :rolleyes:

Clinton campaigned for Kerry. Bush campaigned for Dole. I am sure if we research more, we can find more cases. It is a narrow requirement, but it does happen.
 
Again, to rehash my original post that no prior president campaigned for any candidate running against his successor.
Try to keep up with the program :rolleyes:

She can't keep up. It's why, after I made her look like a fool, she went into IA hiding.
 
Again, to rehash my original post that no prior president campaigned for any candidate running against his successor.
Try to keep up with the program :rolleyes:

As always, wrong again.

Not one of them came out and publicly campaigned for any candidate, now did they?

Once again:

"George H.W. Bush, like Mr. Obama, had a general rule of not speaking against successors. Yet, he did so often while campaigning for Republican candidates during the 1994 mid-term elections. "

You:

x3gPCbG.gif
 
As always, wrong again.



Once again:

"George H.W. Bush, like Mr. Obama, had a general rule of not speaking against successors. Yet, he did so often while campaigning for Republican candidates during the 1994 mid-term elections. "

You:

x3gPCbG.gif

"running against his successor" is my quote. Successor is just that. His successor wouldn't be running in the midterms. None of them went out on a campaign trail against their successor, meaning the sitting president. That was my point. I didn't think I needed to further explain that.
But hey, take it or leave it, It won't change a thing. You and I are at opposite ends of the spectrum politically. I can be civil in other matters though.
 
"running against his successor" is my quote. Successor is just that. His successor wouldn't be running in the midterms. None of them went out on a campaign trail against their successor, meaning the sitting president. That was my point. I didn't think I needed to further explain that.
But hey, take it or leave it, It won't change a thing. You and I are at opposite ends of the spectrum politically. I can be civil in other matters though.

No matter how you choose to word it or change the parameters, the fact remains that you are wrong. Obama is not the first person to campaign for a candidate and against his successor.

"Clinton rises from sick bed to boost Kerry campaign

"The former president told a boisterous rally in Philadelphia that Mr Kerry, the Democratic challenger, would be a champion of the middle classes who had been hit hard by the Republican administration of George Bush.

"Mr Clinton, who has been warned by doctors not to exert himself too much after his surgery, looked well as he walked out onto the stage in the biggest city in Pennsylvania, which is one of the key swing states that will settle the November 2 poll.

"His first words on stage were "If this is not good for my heart I don't know what is.""

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/25/uselections2004.usa8
 
Back
Top