Prediction. Scott Brown Wins MA Senate

Chapdog said:
People dont realize this about MA because we are such a blue stronghold but we have a huge registered independent population. I believe its bigger then registered dems or registered republicans.
Click to expand...

Chap, the only reason Mass has more independents than in other states is because independents can vote in either primary. The only real effect that registering Democrat or Republican has is to deprive you of the ability to vote in the others primary. All state with a semi-open primary system have huge numbers of independents, but independent candidates get almost no votes.
 
Ok people... we are going to issue a spastic troll alert... use caution when entering this thread. What was an interesting conversation between two MA residents has now become a spastic troll zone... proceed with caution. The lil emo could explode at any time...
 
raising the deficit from 10T to 15T is much worse for our country with some lame health-care plan that doesn't even have a public option. Besides we dont need a watered down version of health-connector in this state. we already have it. I dont wanna pay for Tennessee health-care.
 
President Obama plans to visit the state Sunday to campaign for Senate candidate Martha Coakley, a senior Democratic official said. (Boston Globe, 1:41 p.m.)
 
Superfreak said:
Ok people... we are going to issue a spastic troll alert... use caution when entering this thread. What was an interesting conversation between two MA residents has now become a spastic troll zone... proceed with caution. The lil emo could explode at any time...
Click to expand...

Atheistmark said:
I weep for my nation. A Scott Brown victory will be the end of America. We will be Chinese territory in 20 years if Scott Brown wins.
Click to expand...

Atheistmark said:
Seriously, Democrats. This is a life and death issue in Massachusetts. It will be the end of America is generic lockstep Republican Scott Brown is allowed to destroy this nation. Allowing Scott Brown to win is like allowing a serial killer to escape.
Click to expand...

lol...prescient
 
Chapdog said:
effective to ignorant independents but not intelligent independents. We will see how it works for her on Tuesday.
Click to expand...

negative ads always work, and they work well. I used to post like ten different studies on this but I'm too lazy to find them right now. The jist is they leave a bigger impression, they are easier to remember, and they save money because they are that much more effective. One negative ad is worth 5 positive ones.
 
Superfreak said:
Ok... so he breaks with Reps 5% of the time compared to Coakley walking lockstep with Dems 100% of the time. So bottom line... he is definitely the more bi-partisan of the two.
Click to expand...

We don't need a bi-partisan. We need a partisan. A Democratic partisan. And Brown isn't even a bi-partisan, he's a Republican partisan, which is as evil as it gets.
 
Actually I'll talk to you anyway because there's really no plausible way your vote could seriously effect things one way or the other. Not even if this were the Minnesota senate race.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top