Topspin
Verified User
I'd bet because of this, it could be proven liberals have more cases of gonorrhea also .![]()
I bet your an expert on the spread of gonorrhea first hand.

I'd bet because of this, it could be proven liberals have more cases of gonorrhea also .![]()
I bet your an expert on the spread of gonorrhea first hand.![]()
I bet your an expert on the spread of gonorrhea first hand.![]()
can't say I am...how bout you? how many times? you can tell us we won't tell...![]()
you've spread gonorrhea first hand?
no but I bet you have
if you haven't, then how do you purport to call someone else an expert on it?
I have faith that you GED rightwingers talk about it alot, it's not talked about in educated circles.![]()
I have faith that you GED rightwingers talk about it alot, it's not talked about in educated circles.![]()
oh, that's so......ironic. 'educated' folks don't talk about it....which is probably why there are more STD incidents among you college folk.
did they teach you that at the votech school you went to![]()
did they teach you that at the votech school you went to![]()
oh, that's so......ironic. 'educated' folks don't talk about it....which is probably why there are more STD incidents among you college folk.
It's because of all the sex we had in college.
which only reinforces the point that college students/graduates are not any more intelligent than non college students/graduates....and may be even less so.
Sex = awesome
Sex > intelligence
hmmmm.....thus "awesome" > "intelligence"????....I think you have forgotten that "sex" is a variable.....or maybe you are just too young to have learned that yet?...../grins......
Yes, I know....and the Baptist think they are there all by themselves!???....I'm glad Christians are as judgmental as you appear to be.....heaven would be empty......
which only reinforces the point that college students/graduates are not any more intelligent than non college students/graduates....and may be even less so.
So then what you're saying it that then by proxy then others are not rational for not believing in their faith? That's absurd Damo.But you did. You said the onus was on them to prove the existence of what they freely admit is a faith. There is no need to prove such a thing, they aren't saying that it is a fact and not a faith issue. To state that it is a "fact" that God doesn't exist because of the lack of evidence is a statement of faith, they seek either proof of what you deem a "fact" or to stop claiming it is "more rational" and supported by evidence. Absence of evidence is not the same thing as evidence of absence. You may only be looking in the wrong place.